- Win Rate
- 51.0%
- Pick Rate
- 3.4%
- Ban Rate
- 4.9%
Warwick vs Rammus
- Patch
- 26.22
- Games
- 6,656
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Nov 14, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Warwick vs Rammus (Jungle): Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 ranked games over the last 2 patches (gold diff at 15: +199). Patch 26.22 build & runes.
Warwick51.8%
Current data slightly favors Warwick, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 games (95% range 45.3–58.2%).
Warwick Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Warwick performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who wins Warwick vs Rammus?
Warwick wins 51.8% of these games. With this many games the true rate is most likely between 45.3% and 58.2% (95% range).
- Expected
- 50.3% From both champions' overall Jungle win rates
- Matchup effect
- +1.5 pts Observed minus expected
- Sample
- 228 games Lane: Jungle · Patch 26.21–26.22
- vs patch 26.21
- +1.3 pts Within normal patch-to-patch noise
Lane: Jungle · Ranked Solo/Duo & Flex · North America server · All ranks · Patch 26.21–26.22 · Oct 27 – Nov 13
The headline win rate covers patches 26.21–26.22 (228 games). The lane, game-length, build and rune sections below use patch 26.22 only (76 games).
Key takeaways
- Current data slightly favors Warwick, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 games (95% range 45.3–58.2%).
- Both champions' overall Jungle win rates predict 50.3% for Warwick; the result is within the margin of error of that, so this matchup mostly reflects the two champions' general strength.
- Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 199, within the margin of error (76 games).
- Warwick players pick Death's Dance much less often against Rammus: 32.1% of their other Jungle games, 17.1% here.
How we calculate this
Games: ranked Solo/Duo and Flex games on the North America server from the patch shown. Remakes (games under 5 minutes) are excluded.
A game only counts when Warwick and Rammus played the same position on opposite teams, so roaming, lane swaps within a team or a champion merely being in the same game never count as this matchup.
The 95% range is a Wilson score interval. Confidence comes from how wide that range is: within ±3 points is very high, ±5 high, ±8 moderate, anything wider low. Below 20 games a matchup is not classified at all.
Expected win rate combines both champions’ win rates in this lane (same games and filters) with the log5 formula: E = A(1−B) / (A(1−B) + B(1−A)). Matchup effect = observed − expected.
"What changes" compares Warwick's choices in this matchup with the same champion's other games in the same lane, and lists a change only when it is at least 3 points and statistically significant (two-proportion z-test, |z| ≥ 2, 20+ games).
Results are not split by rank: the sample per rank is too small for honest per-rank matchup numbers.
Warwick vs Rammus Laning Stats
At 15 minutes
Whole-game averages
Warwick vs Rammus Win Rate by Game Length
Warwick's win rate against Rammus by game length. The dot is the win rate, the bar its 95% range and the dashed line the champion's usual win rate at that length. Lengths with fewer than 25 games are left blank.
No game length stands out: Warwick's results against Rammus in short and long games are within the margin of error of each other.
Warwick vs Rammus Power Spikes
Who is ahead at each stage, measured from these games. A stage reads "Even" when the difference is inside the margin of error, and "Insufficient data" when there are too few games to tell.
- Lane (15 min)EvenWarwick gold at 15: +199
- First itemEvenWarwick: 0.2 min · Rammus: 0.2 min
- Games under 20 minInsufficient data
- 20–30 min gamesInsufficient data
- 30+ min gamesInsufficient data
What Warwick Changes Against Rammus
Choices Warwick players make noticeably more or less often in this matchup than in their other Jungle games.
Death's DanceItemUsually32.1%vs Rammus17.1%−15.0 pts
Press the AttackKeystoneUsually23.7%vs Rammus35.5%+11.9 pts51.9% WR here
Titanic HydraItemUsually11.6%vs Rammus19.7%+8.1 pts
Usually4.4%vs Rammus9.2%+4.8 pts
Mosstomper Seedling + Health PotionStarting itemsUsually1.8%vs Rammus5.3%+3.5 pts
Best Warwick Build vs Rammus
Usual Warwick build (Jungle)
67.0% win rate · 91 games
Against Rammus
Not enough matchup-specific build data: only 4 of 43 Warwick games against Rammus carried a complete build, which is too few to recommend an item path from. Use Warwick's standard build instead.
- Warwick usually completes Gustwalker Hatchling first, at 0.2 min (median of 42 games).
- Rammus usually completes Gustwalker Hatchling first, at 0.2 min (median of 35 games).
- Skill priority: W > Q > E — the same as usual.
Builds are ranked by the lower edge of their win rate range, not the raw win rate, so a build seen in a handful of wins never outranks a proven one.
Best Warwick Runes vs Rammus
Usual Warwick runes (Jungle)
Lethal Tempo
60.8% win rate · 79 games
Against Rammus
Lethal Tempo52.9% win rate · 34 games
Plan your Warwick draft in Draft Lab
Draft Lab lays out both teams lane by lane with live matchup win rates, damage profiles and game-phase lean, and suggests picks and bans from current meta data.
- Full 5v5 draft board
- Lane matchup win rates
- Pick and ban suggestions
Warwick matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.22. The table below shows Warwick's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Warwick build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Other Warwick Matchups
Hardest for Warwick
Easiest for Warwick
Win rate and games for each matchup. Lists are ranked by the edge of the 95% range so small samples cannot top them; matchups with at least 50 games only.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Warwick vs Rammus FAQ - Patch 26.21–26.22
Who wins Warwick vs Rammus?
Current data slightly favors Warwick, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 games (95% range 45.3–58.2%).
What is Warwick's win rate against Rammus?
Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 Jungle games against Rammus on patch 26.21–26.22 (95% range 45.3–58.2%). Based on both champions' overall Jungle win rates, 50.3% would be expected.
Does Warwick counter Rammus?
Not clearly. Warwick wins 51.8% of 228 games against Rammus, and the 95% range (45.3–58.2%) includes 50%, so neither champion reliably counters the other on current data.
Who wins lane, Warwick or Rammus?
Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 199, within the margin of error (76 games).
Does Warwick outscale Rammus?
There are too few games of each length to tell yet.
When is Rammus strongest against Warwick?
On current data there is no stage of the game where Rammus is ahead of Warwick beyond the margin of error.
What should Warwick build against Rammus?
There are not enough games for a matchup-specific core, so use Warwick's usual Jungle core: Kraken Slayer, Stridebreaker, Death's Dance. The biggest change against Rammus: Death's Dance (32.1% usually, 17.1% here).
What runes should Warwick use against Rammus?
Lethal Tempo with Precision and Sorcery — 52.9% over 34 games against Rammus. The biggest change against Rammus: Press the Attack (23.7% usually, 35.5% here).