
Xerathvs Cassiopeia
Xerath vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Cassiopeia wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Xerath based on 21 games. Cassiopeia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Xerath build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Xerath Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Xerath performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Xerath vs Cassiopeia Matchup?

Xerath vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Xerath's 33.3%, giving Cassiopeia a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Cassiopeia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Xerath players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Cassiopeia leads by 430 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia has a strong advantage in this matchup. Xerath players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Cassiopeia overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Xerath vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Xerath is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Xerath holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Xerath Build Against Cassiopeia
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Xerath needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Xerath against Cassiopeia are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Horizon Focus. This combination gives Xerath an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 4 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 77.8% win rate — a 55.6 percentage point lead over Xerath. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 58.3% win rate — 16.7 points above Xerath. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Cassiopeia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Xerath players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Xerath Runes Against Cassiopeia
The Inspiration and Sorcery rune setup gives Xerath the best tools to compete against Cassiopeia in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Xerath matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Xerath's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Xerath build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.75% | 187 | 3.7 | 930 | 11,446 | 61.9% | 55.6% | |
| 50.72% | 138 | 2.5 | 828 | 10,115 | 55.8% | 47.7% | |
| 56.44% | 101 | 6.5 | 1,052 | 12,103 | 65.6% | 52.2% | |
| 58.95% | 95 | 6.1 | 995 | 11,301 | 59.5% | 58.6% | |
| 56.98% | 86 | 4.8 | 1,019 | 12,029 | 58.8% | 55.8% | |
| 60.26% | 78 | 2.8 | 902 | 11,002 | 53.9% | 63.5% | |
| 51.43% | 70 | 2.1 | 840 | 9,712 | 46.4% | 54.8% | |
| 47.83% | 69 | 5.8 | 903 | 11,455 | 50.0% | 46.5% | |
| 51.52% | 66 | 6.5 | 1,034 | 12,435 | 68.0% | 41.5% | |
| 61.54% | 65 | 6.7 | 1,021 | 12,295 | 65.4% | 59.0% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 6.7 | 955 | 11,216 | 64.3% | 38.9% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 5.8 | 1,047 | 11,805 | 58.3% | 53.9% | |
| 57.38% | 61 | 3.4 | 951 | 11,415 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 6.0 | 948 | 11,522 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 6.0 | 1,063 | 11,980 | 57.7% | 52.9% | |
| 56.90% | 58 | 6.3 | 1,100 | 11,134 | 54.5% | 58.3% | |
| 40.35% | 57 | 2.0 | 784 | 9,972 | 47.8% | 35.3% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 5.9 | 936 | 10,287 | 57.1% | 31.4% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 2.8 | 862 | 10,416 | 52.4% | 57.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 3.5 | 1,007 | 11,685 | 61.5% | 51.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 5.3 | 893 | 11,265 | 63.2% | 35.5% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.5 | 1,014 | 11,319 | 36.8% | 60.0% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 2.0 | 848 | 9,615 | 47.1% | 41.9% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 6.3 | 1,065 | 12,400 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 2.1 | 772 | 9,371 | 42.9% | 42.3% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 2.1 | 778 | 9,136 | 52.2% | 50.0% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 2.1 | 693 | 9,022 | 44.4% | 65.2% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 2.4 | 837 | 10,693 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 6.6 | 1,110 | 12,666 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 5.4 | 1,101 | 12,573 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.0 | 1,031 | 12,373 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.3 | 998 | 10,833 | 45.5% | 52.2% | |
| 70.59% | 34 | 6.4 | 1,073 | 12,481 | 62.5% | 73.1% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.6 | 970 | 11,971 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 3.0 | 1,021 | 10,624 | 61.5% | 55.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.6 | 902 | 11,835 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.6 | 1,161 | 11,353 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.0 | 811 | 9,196 | 45.5% | 47.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 3.0 | 896 | 11,059 | 40.0% | 53.3% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.7 | 1,137 | 12,124 | 61.5% | 37.5% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 5.7 | 1,056 | 12,695 | 57.1% | 35.0% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.1 | 789 | 9,740 | 55.6% | 27.8% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 6.5 | 1,048 | 10,892 | 61.5% | 35.7% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 2.2 | 926 | 11,639 | 62.5% | 63.2% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 6.1 | 1,238 | 13,158 | 60.0% | 68.2% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 2.2 | 780 | 9,231 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 2.0 | 786 | 9,938 | 10.0% | 43.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.4 | 1,075 | 11,747 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.9 | 875 | 10,719 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.4 | 786 | 9,160 | 54.5% | 35.7% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 954 | 12,055 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.0 | 1,074 | 12,974 | 80.0% | 63.2% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 11,397 | 54.5% | 41.7% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.2 | 968 | 10,725 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.4 | 1,226 | 13,670 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 3.2 | 955 | 11,768 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 6.4 | 1,145 | 10,429 | 22.2% | 41.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.4 | 1,037 | 11,073 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 4.3 | 1,004 | 12,850 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.3 | 1,111 | 13,781 | 75.0% | 53.9% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 5.9 | 960 | 9,961 | 22.2% | 41.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.7 | 1,137 | 13,521 | 50.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.6 | 909 | 10,556 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 1.8 | 775 | 9,650 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.9 | 1,056 | 13,553 | 40.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.4 | 1,019 | 13,370 | 85.7% | 45.5% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 2.0 | 804 | 8,787 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.2 | 892 | 11,036 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.1 | 612 | 8,623 | 62.5% | 44.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 3.5 | 894 | 12,074 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 747 | 8,420 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 2.3 | 889 | 10,599 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 1,175 | 13,827 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.5 | 1,125 | 11,398 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.1 | 1,080 | 14,026 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.8 | 886 | 9,556 | 71.4% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.4 | 989 | 12,658 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.1 | 985 | 9,551 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 984 | 10,898 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 1,088 | 8,865 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 90.91% | 11 | 6.3 | 1,149 | 12,328 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,006 | 11,670 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.2 | 1,091 | 11,152 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 863 | 9,562 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 967 | 12,630 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 1,043 | 14,696 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.1 | 1,077 | 10,202 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.5 | 1,078 | 12,021 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.5 | 741 | 8,771 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 778 | 9,316 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 955 | 13,190 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 848 | 8,614 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.0 | 807 | 10,297 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 959 | 9,684 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.0 | 1,112 | 9,574 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 705 | 8,514 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.9 | 994 | 8,527 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,101 | 14,236 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.3 | 879 | 12,401 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.8 | 851 | 8,649 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 829 | 12,884 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.2 | 795 | 7,158 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.2 | 1,090 | 15,583 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 896 | 11,242 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 843 | 11,012 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Xerath vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Xerath do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Xerath's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Xerath do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Xerath with a 77.8% win rate versus 22.2%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Xerath do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 58.3% win rate compared to 41.7%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Xerath with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Xerath build against Cassiopeia?
The best Xerath build against Cassiopeia includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Horizon Focus with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Xerath runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Xerath runes against Cassiopeia use the Inspiration primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 16.7% win rate in the Xerath vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Xerath counter Cassiopeia?
No, Xerath struggles against Cassiopeia with only a 33.3% win rate. Cassiopeia has the advantage in this matchup. Xerath players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Cassiopeia's lead.
How do I play Xerath against Cassiopeia?
When playing Xerath against Cassiopeia, play cautiously and avoid Cassiopeia's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Cassiopeia has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
