Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
43.8% WR
VS
Brimstone
56.3% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Brimstone Matchup?
Winner
Brimstone
Matches: 16
43.8%
Win Rate
56.3%
1.29
Avg KDA
1.89
15.7
Avg Kills
15.9
15.0
Avg Deaths
14.0
155.3
DMG/Round
142.9
24.0%
HS %
27.0%
221
Combat Score
223
43.6%
Attack WR
46.7%
53.3%
Defense WR
56.4%
Raze vs Brimstone Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 16 matches reveals that Brimstone holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Brimstone's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.29Raze
1.89Brimstone
Brimstone significantly outperforms Raze in fragging efficiency with a 1.89 KDA compared to 1.29. This 0.61 KDA differential indicates that Brimstone players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
155.3Raze
142.9Brimstone
Raze outputs 155.3 average damage per round, edging out Brimstone's 142.9 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Raze secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
43.6%Raze
46.7%Brimstone
Brimstone shows stronger attack-side performance with a 46.7% win rate versus Raze's 43.6%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Brimstone provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
53.3%Raze
56.4%Brimstone
Defensive capabilities favor Brimstone at 56.4% win rate compared to Raze's 53.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Brimstone provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Raze vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 16 competitive matches analyzed, Brimstone wins 56.3% of the time compared to Raze's 43.8%, a 12.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Brimstone has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against Brimstone and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Raze vs Brimstone Fragging Analysis
Brimstone claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Raze vs Brimstone matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 16 ranked games reveals Brimstone consistently outperforms Raze in direct combat scenarios. While Raze manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Brimstone in gunfights. Raze players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Brimstone dominates.
Avg KDA
1.29Raze
1.89Brimstone
The KDA disparity between Brimstone and Raze is substantial: 1.89 versus 1.29, a commanding 0.61 point difference that reveals Brimstone's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 16 games shows Brimstone consistently outfragging and outliving Raze in these encounters. For Raze players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Brimstone whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Brimstone's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
15.7Raze
15.9Brimstone
Kill production between Raze and Brimstone is virtually identical, with Raze averaging 15.7 kills per game and Brimstone securing 15.9. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
15.0Raze
14.0Brimstone
Brimstone demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.0 deaths per game versus 15.0. Dying nearly 1.0 fewer times per match gives Brimstone significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
155.3Raze
142.9Brimstone
Raze significantly outdamages Brimstone in head-to-head encounters, posting 155.3 ADR versus 142.9. This 12.3 damage-per-round advantage means Raze consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Brimstone players should avoid prolonged dueling with Raze — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
24.0%Raze
27.0%Brimstone
Brimstone demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Raze: 27.0% versus 24.0%. This 3.1 percentage point gap in precision means Brimstone ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Raze faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Raze vs Brimstone Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Brimstone
43.6%
46.7%
Defense Side
Brimstone
53.3%
56.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Brimstone holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Raze vs Brimstone matchup, winning 46.7% of offensive rounds compared to 43.6% for Raze. This 3.0 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 16 matches reveals Brimstone's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Brimstone consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Raze teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Brimstone's favor in this matchup. When Brimstone takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Raze. For Raze players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Brimstone's advantages. Brimstone can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Raze has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 60.9% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 60.9% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Brimstone's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.0% attack-side gap suggests Brimstone excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Raze should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Brimstone's kit advantages become decisive. For Brimstone, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Brimstone demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Raze, holding 56.4% of rounds versus 53.3%. This 3.0 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Brimstone's defensive advantage. Brimstone can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Raze should avoid solo anchor positions against Brimstone — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Raze's site with Brimstone on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Brimstone in this matchup. Our 16 match analysis shows Brimstone converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Raze should never attempt solo retakes against Brimstone — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Brimstone can confidently take 1vX retakes that Raze should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Brimstone's defensive advantages. Raze should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Brimstone, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Brimstone can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Raze should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Brimstone holds clear advantages on both attack (46.7%) and defense (56.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Brimstone matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Brimstone doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Brimstone's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Brimstone performs better. Raze teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Raze with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Raze's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Brimstone is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Brimstone provides a measurable ranked advantage. Raze players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Brimstone confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Brimstone wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Raze isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Controller (Brimstone) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Brimstone's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Brimstone's Controller kit counters others. The Brimstone advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze vs Brimstone matchup guide: Brimstone leads with a 56.3% win rate, but Raze can still win. Learn how Raze's 155 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 16-match dataset into ranked wins.
