Raze vs YoruMatchups
Raze vs Yoru head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 50.8% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 61 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Raze Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Raze vs Yoru Matchup?
Raze vs Yoru Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 61 matches reveals that Yoru holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Yoru's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Raze vs Yoru Matchup Summary
The Raze vs Yoru matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 61 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 50.8% of the time compared to Yoru's 49.2%, a 1.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Yoru consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze holds a minor advantage, but Yoru can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Raze vs Yoru Fragging Analysis
Yoru edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 61 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Yoru matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Raze vs Yoru Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Yoru demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Raze in this matchup, converting 46.6% of attacking rounds versus 45.3%. While this 1.3 point edge gives Yoru slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 61 competitive games suggests Yoru's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Raze teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.3% gap.
When taking entry duels, Yoru holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Raze players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Yoru can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Yoru's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Raze should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Yoru shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Raze, winning 54.7% of defense rounds compared to 53.4%. This 1.3 percentage point edge suggests Yoru's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Raze players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Yoru can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Raze should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Yoru demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Yoru converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Raze should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Yoru when you can wait for teammates. Yoru can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Raze should be more conservative with eco aggression against Yoru and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Yoru can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Yoru maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.6% attack win rate and 54.7% defense win rate. While Yoru is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Yoru specific factors. The slight Yoru advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Yoru are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Yoru has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Yoru just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Raze and Yoru fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Yoru is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Yoru's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Raze has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Killjoy at 16.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.68% | 146 | 1.25 | 153.0 | 19.0% | 45.4% | 54.5% | |
| 49.12% | 114 | 1.28 | 153.2 | 19.7% | 47.1% | 53.5% | |
| 41.11% | 90 | 1.20 | 149.1 | 19.7% | 44.1% | 50.5% | |
| 50.00% | 86 | 1.35 | 159.3 | 20.1% | 47.5% | 52.1% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 1.30 | 161.3 | 21.3% | 48.1% | 52.9% | |
| 50.82% | 61 | 1.19 | 148.6 | 20.7% | 45.3% | 53.4% | |
| 41.38% | 58 | 1.29 | 154.9 | 20.5% | 46.3% | 50.2% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 1.31 | 157.4 | 20.2% | 46.4% | 51.6% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 1.17 | 141.7 | 19.8% | 45.2% | 48.2% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.32 | 159.4 | 20.7% | 43.1% | 57.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.39 | 161.0 | 17.5% | 50.5% | 53.9% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 1.30 | 150.0 | 19.2% | 51.2% | 48.8% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.23 | 145.6 | 21.5% | 45.8% | 52.1% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.47 | 166.0 | 23.4% | 45.5% | 61.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.19 | 145.3 | 16.2% | 52.1% | 49.6% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.35 | 167.1 | 20.9% | 40.0% | 56.8% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.30 | 149.2 | 24.7% | 36.4% | 61.2% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.21 | 136.9 | 17.5% | 50.6% | 46.6% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.27 | 143.9 | 19.9% | 56.4% | 47.2% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.43 | 165.0 | 21.0% | 51.1% | 55.4% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.39 | 163.3 | 27.5% | 47.4% | 58.8% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.66 | 177.2 | 16.7% | 59.1% | 71.2% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.08 | 125.3 | 19.6% | 42.1% | 41.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.57 | 172.8 | 23.4% | 63.8% | 58.7% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?
Raze's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Killjoy, with only a 16.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.