Raze vs YoruMatchups
Raze vs Yoru head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 52.8% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 72 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Raze Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Raze vs Yoru Matchup?
Raze vs Yoru Performance Breakdown
The Raze vs Yoru matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 72 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Raze vs Yoru Matchup Summary
The Raze vs Yoru matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 72 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 52.8% of the time compared to Yoru's 47.2%, a 5.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Yoru consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Yoru players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Raze vs Yoru Fragging Analysis
Raze edges out Yoru in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 72 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Yoru matchup remains contestable for both sides. Yoru shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Yoru's favor.
Raze vs Yoru Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Yoru reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 44.7% of attacking rounds compared to Yoru's 45.2%. This negligible 0.5 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Yoru should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 72 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Yoru players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Yoru, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.5% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Yoru is virtually identical, with Raze holding 54.8% of rounds on CT side and Yoru at 55.3%. This 0.5 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Yoru can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.5% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Yoru. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 72 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Yoru.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Yoru specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Yoru maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 45.2% attack win rate and 55.3% defense win rate. While Yoru is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Yoru specific factors. The slight Yoru advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Yoru are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Yoru has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Yoru just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Raze and Yoru fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Yoru is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Yoru's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Raze has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 62.5% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Waylay at 37.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.81% | 172 | 1.31 | 157.9 | 20.4% | 46.1% | 56.9% | |
| 57.58% | 99 | 1.35 | 159.7 | 20.9% | 48.1% | 55.5% | |
| 55.91% | 93 | 1.34 | 155.4 | 19.6% | 46.5% | 55.8% | |
| 52.94% | 85 | 1.30 | 152.6 | 20.2% | 48.4% | 53.3% | |
| 49.32% | 73 | 1.38 | 159.5 | 20.2% | 47.7% | 52.2% | |
| 52.78% | 72 | 1.29 | 156.2 | 22.2% | 44.7% | 54.8% | |
| 37.50% | 64 | 1.26 | 150.8 | 20.0% | 41.7% | 52.8% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 1.35 | 157.9 | 20.0% | 47.0% | 53.2% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 1.31 | 153.7 | 20.1% | 44.8% | 53.7% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 1.26 | 158.7 | 20.0% | 48.9% | 46.6% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.46 | 173.4 | 22.2% | 48.2% | 54.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.29 | 155.8 | 21.0% | 46.5% | 60.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.15 | 141.3 | 17.7% | 48.4% | 49.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.39 | 158.5 | 19.8% | 43.6% | 58.7% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.42 | 171.6 | 18.5% | 52.7% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.36 | 172.1 | 17.3% | 45.0% | 52.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.34 | 173.8 | 20.9% | 42.2% | 52.2% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.15 | 126.5 | 21.7% | 44.9% | 58.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.32 | 156.7 | 21.8% | 42.7% | 53.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.39 | 154.7 | 16.3% | 57.8% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.27 | 150.3 | 17.4% | 45.6% | 65.2% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.23 | 156.7 | 24.8% | 49.1% | 57.7% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?
Raze's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 62.5% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Waylay, with only a 37.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.