Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
50.0% WR
VS
Neon
48.5% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Raze
Matches: 66
50.0%
Win Rate
48.5%
1.40
Avg KDA
1.24
18.4
Avg Kills
16.7
16.1
Avg Deaths
17.2
165.0
DMG/Round
139.3
20.9%
HS %
20.5%
247
Combat Score
223
46.1%
Attack WR
46.1%
53.9%
Defense WR
53.9%
Raze vs Neon Performance Breakdown
In the Raze vs Neon matchup, Raze demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 66 analyzed matches, Raze outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Raze the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.40Raze
1.24Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.40 and 1.24 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
165.0Raze
139.3Neon
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (165.0 ADR) compared to Neon's 139.3 ADR. This 25.6 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.1%Raze
46.1%Neon
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 46.1% and Neon at 46.1% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.9%Raze
53.9%Neon
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 53.9% win rate and Neon at 53.9%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 66 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 50.0% of the time compared to Neon's 48.5%, a 1.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Raze consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze holds a minor advantage, but Neon can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Raze vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Raze achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Raze vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Raze holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 66 competitive matches, Raze players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.40Raze
1.24Neon
Raze holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.40 compared to Neon's 1.24. While this 0.17 point difference indicates Raze tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Raze's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
18.4Raze
16.7Neon
Raze substantially outfrags Neon in this matchup, averaging 18.4 kills compared to 16.7 — a difference of nearly 1.6 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Neon, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Neon players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.1Raze
17.2Neon
Raze demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 16.1 deaths per game versus 17.2. Dying nearly 1.1 fewer times per match gives Raze significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
165.0Raze
139.3Neon
The damage differential between Raze and Neon is exceptional: 165.0 ADR compared to just 139.3. Raze deals 25.6 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Neon struggles to even trade effectively. Neon players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
20.9%Raze
20.5%Neon
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Raze (20.9%) and Neon (20.5%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Raze vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
46.1%
46.1%
Defense Side
Raze
53.9%
53.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Neon reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 46.1% of attacking rounds compared to Neon's 46.1%. This negligible 0.0 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Neon should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 66 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Neon players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Neon, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.0% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Neon is virtually identical, with Raze holding 53.9% of rounds on CT side and Neon at 53.9%. This 0.0 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Neon can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.0% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Neon. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 66 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Neon.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Neon specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.1% attack win rate and 53.9% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Neon specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Neon are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Raze and Neon fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Raze is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Raze's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Neon head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 66 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
