Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
51.3% WR
VS
Reyna
47.8% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Reyna Matchup?
Winner
Raze
Matches: 113
51.3%
Win Rate
47.8%
1.32
Avg KDA
1.33
17.4
Avg Kills
17.4
16.3
Avg Deaths
16.3
159.0
DMG/Round
151.3
21.0%
HS %
32.1%
238
Combat Score
230
46.1%
Attack WR
45.2%
54.8%
Defense WR
53.9%
Raze vs Reyna Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 113 matches reveals that Raze holds a clear advantage over Reyna in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Reyna shows strength in one category, Raze's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.32Raze
1.33Reyna
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Reyna, with KDA ratios of 1.32 and 1.33 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
159.0Raze
151.3Reyna
Raze outputs 159.0 average damage per round, edging out Reyna's 151.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Raze secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
46.1%Raze
45.2%Reyna
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 46.1% and Reyna at 45.2% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
54.8%Raze
53.9%Reyna
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 54.8% win rate and Reyna at 53.9%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Reyna matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 113 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 51.3% of the time compared to Reyna's 47.8%, a 3.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Reyna consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Reyna players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Raze vs Reyna Fragging Analysis
Reyna edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 113 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Reyna matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.32Raze
1.33Reyna
The KDA comparison between Raze and Reyna reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Raze averaging 1.32 and Reyna posting 1.33. This razor-thin margin of just 0.00 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.4Raze
17.4Reyna
Kill production between Raze and Reyna is virtually identical, with Raze averaging 17.4 kills per game and Reyna securing 17.4. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.3Raze
16.3Reyna
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Raze (16.3 deaths/game) and Reyna (16.3 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
159.0Raze
151.3Reyna
Raze applies 7.7 more damage per round than Reyna in this matchup (159.0 vs 151.3 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Raze contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Reyna can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
21.0%Raze
32.1%Reyna
The headshot percentage disparity between Reyna and Raze is substantial: 32.1% compared to 21.0%, a 11.2 point difference. Reyna consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Reyna in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Reyna's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Reyna Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
46.1%
45.2%
Defense Side
Raze
54.8%
53.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Reyna reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 46.1% of attacking rounds compared to Reyna's 45.2%. This negligible 0.9 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Reyna should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 113 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Reyna players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Reyna, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.9% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Reyna is virtually identical, with Raze holding 54.8% of rounds on CT side and Reyna at 53.9%. This 0.9 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Reyna can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.9% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Reyna. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 113 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Reyna.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Reyna specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.1% attack win rate and 54.8% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Reyna remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Reyna specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Reyna are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Reyna is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Reyna, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Raze and Reyna fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Raze is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Raze's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Reyna head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 51.3% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 113 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
