Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
48.8% WR
VS
Chamber
49.8% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 207
48.8%
Win Rate
49.8%
1.30
Avg KDA
1.28
17.0
Avg Kills
16.8
16.3
Avg Deaths
15.0
157.2
DMG/Round
143.3
20.8%
HS %
30.0%
235
Combat Score
218
47.9%
Attack WR
47.8%
52.2%
Defense WR
52.1%
Raze vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
In the Raze vs Chamber matchup, Raze demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 207 analyzed matches, Raze outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Raze the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.30Raze
1.28Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.30 and 1.28 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
157.2Raze
143.3Chamber
Raze outputs 157.2 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 143.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Raze secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.9%Raze
47.8%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 47.9% and Chamber at 47.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.2%Raze
52.1%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 52.2% win rate and Chamber at 52.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 207 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 49.8% of the time compared to Raze's 48.8%, a 1.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Raze nor Chamber has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Raze vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Raze edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 207 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Avg KDA
1.30Raze
1.28Chamber
The KDA comparison between Raze and Chamber reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Raze averaging 1.30 and Chamber posting 1.28. This razor-thin margin of just 0.02 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.0Raze
16.8Chamber
Kill production between Raze and Chamber is virtually identical, with Raze averaging 17.0 kills per game and Chamber securing 16.8. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.3Raze
15.0Chamber
Chamber demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 15.0 deaths per game versus 16.3. Dying nearly 1.3 fewer times per match gives Chamber significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
157.2Raze
143.3Chamber
Raze significantly outdamages Chamber in head-to-head encounters, posting 157.2 ADR versus 143.3. This 13.8 damage-per-round advantage means Raze consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Chamber players should avoid prolonged dueling with Raze — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
20.8%Raze
30.0%Chamber
The headshot percentage disparity between Chamber and Raze is substantial: 30.0% compared to 20.8%, a 9.1 point difference. Chamber consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Chamber in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Chamber's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
47.9%
47.8%
Defense Side
Raze
52.2%
52.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Chamber reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 47.9% of attacking rounds compared to Chamber's 47.8%. This negligible 0.1 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Chamber should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 207 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Chamber players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Chamber, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.1% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Chamber is virtually identical, with Raze holding 52.2% of rounds on CT side and Chamber at 52.1%. This 0.1 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Chamber can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.1% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Chamber. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 207 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Chamber.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Chamber specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.9% attack win rate and 52.2% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze vs Chamber is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.8% vs 49.8%). Based on 207 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
