Raze vs ChamberMatchup
Raze vs Chamber matchup breakdown: Raze dominates with a 55.0% win rate across 80 matches. Superior fragging (1.25 KDA) gives Raze a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
Raze Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Chamber(55.0%)Who Wins the Raze vs Chamber Matchup?
Raze vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
In the Raze vs Chamber matchup, Raze demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 80 analyzed matches, Raze outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Raze the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.
Raze vs Chamber Matchup Summary
The Raze vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 80 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 55.0% of the time compared to Chamber's 45.0%, a 10.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Raze has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Raze and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Raze vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Raze edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 80 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Raze vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
48.4%44.5%55.5%51.6%Attack Side Breakdown
Raze holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Raze vs Chamber matchup, winning 48.4% of offensive rounds compared to 44.5% for Chamber. This 3.9 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 80 matches reveals Raze's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Raze consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Raze's favor in this matchup. When Raze takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Raze's advantages. Raze can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Raze's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.9% attack-side gap suggests Raze excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Raze's kit advantages become decisive. For Raze, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Raze demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 55.5% of rounds versus 51.6%. This 3.9 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Raze's defensive advantage. Raze can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Raze — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Raze on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Raze in this matchup. Our 80 match analysis shows Raze converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Raze — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Raze can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Raze's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Raze, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Raze can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze holds clear advantages on both attack (48.4%) and defense (55.5%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Chamber matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Raze doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Raze's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Raze performs better. Chamber teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Chamber with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Chamber's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Raze is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Raze provides a measurable ranked advantage. Chamber players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Raze confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Raze wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.8 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Chamber isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 6 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Phoenix with a 77.8% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 140 | 1.34 | 157.7 | 20.1% | 46.7% | 53.8% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 1.25 | 149.1 | 19.4% | 48.4% | 55.5% | |
| 54.55% | 77 | 1.25 | 152.7 | 20.4% | 49.5% | 54.7% | |
| 61.29% | 62 | 1.41 | 163.0 | 20.9% | 48.9% | 56.7% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 1.38 | 162.8 | 20.4% | 45.1% | 57.0% | |
| 42.59% | 54 | 1.27 | 153.1 | 20.2% | 44.7% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 1.25 | 154.6 | 20.3% | 49.9% | 51.9% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 1.26 | 151.3 | 21.0% | 47.5% | 49.8% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.24 | 145.5 | 18.9% | 46.2% | 55.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.22 | 149.2 | 21.3% | 48.9% | 48.9% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 1.49 | 174.0 | 22.2% | 53.5% | 54.8% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.20 | 155.1 | 22.3% | 43.6% | 48.5% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.50 | 169.7 | 19.0% | 61.7% | 56.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.18 | 140.9 | 18.2% | 51.0% | 54.9% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.59 | 184.5 | 17.3% | 50.5% | 67.5% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.26 | 137.9 | 15.8% | 38.2% | 68.1% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.24 | 153.1 | 21.5% | 43.5% | 56.2% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.35 | 150.4 | 16.0% | 61.3% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.31 | 155.1 | 20.6% | 39.1% | 54.9% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.12 | 151.0 | 18.0% | 46.2% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 3 | 1.72 | 203.1 | 25.5% | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 0.88 | 113.4 | 19.4% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?
Raze's best matchup is against Phoenix, achieving a 77.8% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 6 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
