Raze vs OmenMatchups
Raze vs Omen matchup guide: Omen leads with a 55.3% win rate, but Raze can still win. Learn how Raze's 144 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 38-match dataset into ranked wins.
Raze Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Raze vs Omen Matchup?
Raze vs Omen Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 38 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Raze vs Omen Matchup Summary
The Raze vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 38 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 55.3% of the time compared to Raze's 44.7%, a 10.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Omen has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against Omen and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Raze vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 38 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Raze vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
46.0%
49.4%50.6%54.0%Attack Side Breakdown
Omen holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Raze vs Omen matchup, winning 49.4% of offensive rounds compared to 46.0% for Raze. This 3.4 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 38 matches reveals Omen's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Omen consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Raze teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Omen's favor in this matchup. When Omen takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Raze. For Raze players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Omen's advantages. Omen can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Omen's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.4% attack-side gap suggests Omen excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Raze should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Omen's kit advantages become decisive. For Omen, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Omen demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Raze, holding 54.0% of rounds versus 50.6%. This 3.4 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Omen's defensive advantage. Omen can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Raze should avoid solo anchor positions against Omen — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Raze's site with Omen on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Omen in this matchup. Our 38 match analysis shows Omen converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Raze should never attempt solo retakes against Omen — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Omen can confidently take 1vX retakes that Raze should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Omen's defensive advantages. Raze should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Omen, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Omen can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Raze should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (49.4%) and defense (54.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Raze teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Raze with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Raze's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Raze players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.8 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Raze isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze has favorable matchups against 15 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 71.4% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 28.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.48% | 270 | 1.27 | 155.2 | 19.6% | 46.2% | 54.5% | |
| 51.11% | 180 | 1.29 | 155.1 | 21.1% | 46.6% | 54.0% | |
| 51.72% | 145 | 1.28 | 156.1 | 20.3% | 45.9% | 55.1% | |
| 47.83% | 138 | 1.31 | 155.0 | 20.5% | 46.9% | 51.4% | |
| 53.85% | 130 | 1.32 | 155.6 | 21.4% | 47.6% | 54.7% | |
| 52.69% | 93 | 1.32 | 157.3 | 20.5% | 46.8% | 54.8% | |
| 46.15% | 91 | 1.32 | 154.7 | 21.1% | 47.5% | 52.3% | |
| 52.87% | 87 | 1.22 | 149.7 | 21.3% | 46.7% | 54.3% | |
| 38.10% | 63 | 1.17 | 144.9 | 21.2% | 43.8% | 49.6% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 1.23 | 150.5 | 20.2% | 45.7% | 52.1% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.21 | 143.7 | 19.2% | 46.0% | 50.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 1.35 | 162.9 | 21.5% | 48.1% | 52.7% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.42 | 163.0 | 20.2% | 51.8% | 49.0% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 1.24 | 150.9 | 17.7% | 45.9% | 54.9% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 1.23 | 153.6 | 21.6% | 45.4% | 52.9% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.14 | 136.2 | 22.0% | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.34 | 158.5 | 19.4% | 54.3% | 53.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 1.26 | 149.8 | 23.6% | 54.1% | 52.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.45 | 168.5 | 23.1% | 47.1% | 58.2% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.41 | 174.4 | 19.5% | 41.6% | 54.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.16 | 129.5 | 20.8% | 47.4% | 48.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.65 | 183.1 | 25.4% | 57.6% | 48.1% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.18 | 130.7 | 18.4% | 38.0% | 48.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.11 | 141.6 | 21.2% | 37.8% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.54 | 173.8 | 19.4% | 42.9% | 73.2% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?
Raze's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 71.4% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 28.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 15 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
