Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
46.3% WR
VS
Omen
50.0% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 54
46.3%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.30
Avg KDA
1.61
16.9
Avg Kills
14.9
16.5
Avg Deaths
14.9
154.6
DMG/Round
129.9
20.1%
HS %
28.5%
231
Combat Score
200
48.6%
Attack WR
49.4%
50.6%
Defense WR
51.4%
Raze vs Omen Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 54 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.30Raze
1.61Omen
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.61 KDA versus Raze's 1.30. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
154.6Raze
129.9Omen
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (154.6 ADR) compared to Omen's 129.9 ADR. This 24.7 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
48.6%Raze
49.4%Omen
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 48.6% and Omen at 49.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.6%Raze
51.4%Omen
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 50.6% win rate and Omen at 51.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 54 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 50.0% of the time compared to Raze's 46.3%, a 3.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Omen has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Raze players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Raze vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 54 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.30Raze
1.61Omen
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Raze, maintaining a 1.61 KDA versus 1.30. This 0.31 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Raze players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
16.9Raze
14.9Omen
Raze substantially outfrags Omen in this matchup, averaging 16.9 kills compared to 14.9 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Omen, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Omen players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.5Raze
14.9Omen
Omen demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.9 deaths per game versus 16.5. Dying nearly 1.6 fewer times per match gives Omen significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
154.6Raze
129.9Omen
The damage differential between Raze and Omen is exceptional: 154.6 ADR compared to just 129.9. Raze deals 24.7 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Omen struggles to even trade effectively. Omen players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
20.1%Raze
28.5%Omen
The headshot percentage disparity between Omen and Raze is substantial: 28.5% compared to 20.1%, a 8.4 point difference. Omen consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Omen in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Omen's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
48.6%
49.4%
Defense Side
Omen
50.6%
51.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Omen reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 48.6% of attacking rounds compared to Omen's 49.4%. This negligible 0.8 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Omen should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 54 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Omen players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Omen, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.8% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Omen is virtually identical, with Raze holding 50.6% of rounds on CT side and Omen at 51.4%. This 0.8 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Omen can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.8% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Omen. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 54 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Omen.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Omen specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.4% attack win rate and 51.4% defense win rate. While Omen is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Omen specific factors. The slight Omen advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Omen are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Omen has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Omen just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze vs Omen is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.3% vs 50.0%). Based on 54 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
