Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
54.2% WR
VS
Tejo
45.8% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Tejo Matchup?
Winner
Raze
Matches: 24
54.2%
Win Rate
45.8%
1.26
Avg KDA
1.47
15.7
Avg Kills
16.0
15.6
Avg Deaths
14.7
144.2
DMG/Round
146.1
19.5%
HS %
25.8%
217
Combat Score
217
48.0%
Attack WR
45.0%
55.0%
Defense WR
52.0%
Raze vs Tejo Performance Breakdown
The Raze vs Tejo matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 24 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.26Raze
1.47Tejo
Tejo maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.47 KDA versus Raze's 1.26. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Tejo players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
144.2Raze
146.1Tejo
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Raze averaging 144.2 ADR and Tejo at 146.1 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
48.0%Raze
45.0%Tejo
Raze shows stronger attack-side performance with a 48.0% win rate versus Tejo's 45.0%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Raze provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
55.0%Raze
52.0%Tejo
Defensive capabilities favor Raze at 55.0% win rate compared to Tejo's 52.0%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Raze provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Raze vs Tejo matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 24 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 54.2% of the time compared to Tejo's 45.8%, a 8.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Tejo consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Raze dominates this matchup statistically. Raze can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Tejo should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Raze vs Tejo Fragging Analysis
Tejo achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Raze in the Raze vs Tejo matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Tejo holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 24 competitive matches, Tejo players can approach duels against Raze with confidence, while Raze players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.26Raze
1.47Tejo
Tejo holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.47 compared to Raze's 1.26. While this 0.20 point difference indicates Tejo tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Tejo's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Raze players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.7Raze
16.0Tejo
Kill production between Raze and Tejo is virtually identical, with Raze averaging 15.7 kills per game and Tejo securing 16.0. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
15.6Raze
14.7Tejo
Tejo survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.7 times per game compared to Raze's 15.6 deaths. This 1.0 death difference per match means Tejo is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Raze players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Tejo's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
144.2Raze
146.1Tejo
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Raze (144.2 ADR) and Tejo (146.1 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
19.5%Raze
25.8%Tejo
The headshot percentage disparity between Tejo and Raze is substantial: 25.8% compared to 19.5%, a 6.2 point difference. Tejo consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Tejo in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Tejo's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Tejo Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
48.0%
45.0%
Defense Side
Raze
55.0%
52.0%
Attack Side Breakdown
Raze holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Raze vs Tejo matchup, winning 48.0% of offensive rounds compared to 45.0% for Tejo. This 3.0 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 24 matches reveals Raze's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Raze consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Tejo teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Raze's favor in this matchup. When Raze takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Tejo. For Tejo players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Raze's advantages. Raze can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Raze's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.0% attack-side gap suggests Raze excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Tejo should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Raze's kit advantages become decisive. For Raze, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Raze demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Tejo, holding 55.0% of rounds versus 52.0%. This 3.0 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Raze's defensive advantage. Raze can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Tejo should avoid solo anchor positions against Raze — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Tejo's site with Raze on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Raze in this matchup. Our 24 match analysis shows Raze converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Tejo should never attempt solo retakes against Raze — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Raze can confidently take 1vX retakes that Tejo should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Raze's defensive advantages. Tejo should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Raze, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Raze can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Tejo should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze holds clear advantages on both attack (48.0%) and defense (55.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Tejo matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Raze doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Raze's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Raze performs better. Tejo teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Tejo with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Tejo's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Raze is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Raze provides a measurable ranked advantage. Tejo players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Raze confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Raze wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.0 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Tejo isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Initiator (Tejo) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Tejo's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Tejo's Initiator kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Tejo head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 54.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 24 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
