Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
48.6% WR
VS
Clove
49.5% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Clove Matchup?
Winner
Clove
Matches: 325
48.6%
Win Rate
49.5%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.37
16.7
Avg Kills
17.5
16.5
Avg Deaths
18.4
153.4
DMG/Round
152.8
20.6%
HS %
30.4%
229
Combat Score
233
46.4%
Attack WR
46.4%
53.6%
Defense WR
53.6%
Raze vs Clove Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 325 matches reveals that Clove holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Clove's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.27Raze
1.37Clove
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Clove, with KDA ratios of 1.27 and 1.37 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
153.4Raze
152.8Clove
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Raze averaging 153.4 ADR and Clove at 152.8 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
46.4%Raze
46.4%Clove
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 46.4% and Clove at 46.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.6%Raze
53.6%Clove
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 53.6% win rate and Clove at 53.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Clove matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 325 competitive matches analyzed, Clove wins 49.5% of the time compared to Raze's 48.6%, a 0.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Clove consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Neither Raze nor Clove has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Raze vs Clove Fragging Analysis
Clove edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 325 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Clove matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.27Raze
1.37Clove
Clove holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.37 compared to Raze's 1.27. While this 0.10 point difference indicates Clove tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Clove's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Raze players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.7Raze
17.5Clove
Clove secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than Raze in this head-to-head (17.5 vs 16.7). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Clove contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Clove's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Raze can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
16.5Raze
18.4Clove
Raze demonstrates markedly better survivability against Clove, recording 16.5 deaths per game versus 18.4. Dying nearly 1.9 fewer times per match gives Raze significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Clove players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
153.4Raze
152.8Clove
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Raze (153.4 ADR) and Clove (152.8 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
20.6%Raze
30.4%Clove
The headshot percentage disparity between Clove and Raze is substantial: 30.4% compared to 20.6%, a 9.9 point difference. Clove consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Clove in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Clove's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Clove Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Clove
46.4%
46.4%
Defense Side
Clove
53.6%
53.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Clove reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 46.4% of attacking rounds compared to Clove's 46.4%. This negligible 0.1 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Clove should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 325 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Clove players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Clove, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 60.9% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 60.9% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.1% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Clove is virtually identical, with Raze holding 53.6% of rounds on CT side and Clove at 53.6%. This 0.1 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Clove can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.1% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Clove. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 325 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Clove.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Clove specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Clove maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.4% attack win rate and 53.6% defense win rate. While Clove is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Clove specific factors. The slight Clove advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Clove are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Clove has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Clove just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Controller (Clove) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Clove's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Clove's Controller kit counters others. The Clove advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze vs Clove is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.6% vs 49.5%). Based on 325 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
