Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
54.5% WR
VS
Deadlock
45.5% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Deadlock Matchup?
Winner
Raze
Matches: 33
54.5%
Win Rate
45.5%
1.25
Avg KDA
1.34
16.0
Avg Kills
15.0
15.9
Avg Deaths
14.8
152.8
DMG/Round
134.0
21.7%
HS %
30.6%
225
Combat Score
205
43.8%
Attack WR
43.7%
56.3%
Defense WR
56.3%
Raze vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 33 matches reveals that Raze holds a clear advantage over Deadlock in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Deadlock shows strength in one category, Raze's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.25Raze
1.34Deadlock
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Deadlock, with KDA ratios of 1.25 and 1.34 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
152.8Raze
134.0Deadlock
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (152.8 ADR) compared to Deadlock's 134.0 ADR. This 18.8 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
43.8%Raze
43.7%Deadlock
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 43.8% and Deadlock at 43.7% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
56.3%Raze
56.3%Deadlock
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 56.3% win rate and Deadlock at 56.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 33 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 54.5% of the time compared to Deadlock's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Raze dominates this matchup statistically. Raze can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Deadlock should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Raze vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis
Deadlock edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 33 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Deadlock matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.25Raze
1.34Deadlock
The KDA comparison between Raze and Deadlock reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Raze averaging 1.25 and Deadlock posting 1.34. This razor-thin margin of just 0.09 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.0Raze
15.0Deadlock
Raze secures approximately 1.0 more kills per match than Deadlock in this head-to-head (16.0 vs 15.0). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Raze contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Raze's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Deadlock can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.9Raze
14.8Deadlock
Deadlock demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.8 deaths per game versus 15.9. Dying nearly 1.1 fewer times per match gives Deadlock significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
152.8Raze
134.0Deadlock
Raze significantly outdamages Deadlock in head-to-head encounters, posting 152.8 ADR versus 134.0. This 18.8 damage-per-round advantage means Raze consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Deadlock players should avoid prolonged dueling with Raze — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
21.7%Raze
30.6%Deadlock
The headshot percentage disparity between Deadlock and Raze is substantial: 30.6% compared to 21.7%, a 8.9 point difference. Deadlock consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Deadlock in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Deadlock's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Raze
43.8%
43.7%
Defense Side
Raze
56.3%
56.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Raze and Deadlock reveals near-perfect parity, with Raze winning 43.8% of attacking rounds compared to Deadlock's 43.7%. This negligible 0.1 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Raze nor Deadlock should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 33 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Raze and Deadlock players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Raze or Deadlock, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.1% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Raze and Deadlock is virtually identical, with Raze holding 56.3% of rounds on CT side and Deadlock at 56.3%. This 0.1 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Raze and Deadlock can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.1% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Raze and Deadlock. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 33 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Raze or Deadlock.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Raze vs Deadlock specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 43.8% attack win rate and 56.3% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Deadlock remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Raze vs Deadlock specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Raze and Deadlock are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Deadlock is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Deadlock, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Sentinel (Deadlock) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Deadlock's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Deadlock's Sentinel kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Deadlock head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 54.5% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 33 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
