Esta tabla clasifica las composiciones de TFT Set 17 por su colocación promedio, mostrando qué comps logran consistentemente las mejores posiciones. Composiciones de 9 campeones del Set 17: Meeple (97.7% WR, 1.8 prom), Pícaro (94.8% WR, 2.0 prom), Pícaro (95.7% WR, 2.1 prom). Meeple/Estrella oscura lidera con 97.67% de win rate y 1.79 de placement promedio. Pícaro sigue con 94.83% de win rate. Analizando 66 composiciones de 9 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
Traits
AvgWinFirstPick
1.79
Avg Place
97.67%
Win Rate
53.49%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.04
Avg Place
94.83%
Win Rate
37.07%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.12
Avg Place
95.68%
Win Rate
34.88%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
2.16
Avg Place
98.59%
Win Rate
31.69%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
2.25
Avg Place
85.19%
Win Rate
49.38%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.34
Avg Place
88.00%
Win Rate
40.00%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.40
Avg Place
86.67%
Win Rate
43.14%
First Place
0.24%
Pick Rate
2.43
Avg Place
92.99%
Win Rate
24.17%
First Place
0.58%
Pick Rate
2.60
Avg Place
85.96%
Win Rate
36.52%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
2.63
Avg Place
87.33%
Win Rate
27.15%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
2.72
Avg Place
85.19%
Win Rate
31.48%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.76
Avg Place
81.36%
Win Rate
29.66%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
2.77
Avg Place
89.24%
Win Rate
21.08%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
2.84
Avg Place
78.29%
Win Rate
29.61%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
2.89
Avg Place
81.30%
Win Rate
27.61%
First Place
1.06%
Pick Rate
2.92
Avg Place
78.64%
Win Rate
31.75%
First Place
0.16%
Pick Rate
3.02
Avg Place
77.78%
Win Rate
27.37%
First Place
0.45%
Pick Rate
3.05
Avg Place
81.63%
Win Rate
25.85%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
3.11
Avg Place
78.05%
Win Rate
24.39%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.13
Avg Place
77.95%
Win Rate
18.11%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.20
Avg Place
76.42%
Win Rate
17.07%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.21
Avg Place
76.03%
Win Rate
19.70%
First Place
3.52%
Pick Rate
3.27
Avg Place
76.39%
Win Rate
18.72%
First Place
0.55%
Pick Rate
3.30
Avg Place
73.21%
Win Rate
18.75%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.32
Avg Place
69.05%
Win Rate
29.21%
First Place
0.29%
Pick Rate
3.34
Avg Place
74.07%
Win Rate
15.78%
First Place
0.29%
Pick Rate
3.35
Avg Place
72.50%
Win Rate
20.62%
First Place
0.36%
Pick Rate
3.44
Avg Place
76.92%
Win Rate
7.69%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.46
Avg Place
73.18%
Win Rate
14.55%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
3.51
Avg Place
74.42%
Win Rate
13.95%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.57
Avg Place
69.11%
Win Rate
21.99%
First Place
0.63%
Pick Rate
3.57
Avg Place
77.27%
Win Rate
11.36%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.58
Avg Place
68.64%
Win Rate
19.49%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.59
Avg Place
68.70%
Win Rate
11.45%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.65
Avg Place
67.55%
Win Rate
17.12%
First Place
0.87%
Pick Rate
3.67
Avg Place
66.25%
Win Rate
25.31%
First Place
0.19%
Pick Rate
3.68
Avg Place
68.18%
Win Rate
15.45%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.71
Avg Place
63.42%
Win Rate
14.40%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
3.74
Avg Place
64.29%
Win Rate
13.39%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
3.85
Avg Place
59.88%
Win Rate
11.05%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
3.89
Avg Place
64.29%
Win Rate
14.72%
First Place
0.22%
Pick Rate
3.91
Avg Place
63.64%
Win Rate
9.57%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
3.93
Avg Place
60.80%
Win Rate
13.30%
First Place
0.61%
Pick Rate
3.96
Avg Place
60.85%
Win Rate
13.61%
First Place
0.42%
Pick Rate
4.01
Avg Place
57.94%
Win Rate
16.82%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.02
Avg Place
64.84%
Win Rate
12.09%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.06
Avg Place
59.20%
Win Rate
11.88%
First Place
0.72%
Pick Rate
4.10
Avg Place
58.62%
Win Rate
5.52%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
4.11
Avg Place
57.14%
Win Rate
11.61%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.14
Avg Place
55.56%
Win Rate
14.20%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
4.15
Avg Place
59.48%
Win Rate
6.90%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.22
Avg Place
58.82%
Win Rate
5.88%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.22
Avg Place
55.20%
Win Rate
4.80%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.31
Avg Place
50.00%
Win Rate
10.00%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.41
Avg Place
49.64%
Win Rate
8.57%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
4.61
Avg Place
39.29%
Win Rate
7.14%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.75
Avg Place
45.74%
Win Rate
1.06%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
4.83
Avg Place
43.41%
Win Rate
4.75%
First Place
0.22%
Pick Rate
4.97
Avg Place
38.39%
Win Rate
6.31%
First Place
1.52%
Pick Rate
5.17
Avg Place
35.90%
Win Rate
3.59%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
5.22
Avg Place
31.92%
Win Rate
5.29%
First Place
0.63%
Pick Rate
5.38
Avg Place
36.54%
Win Rate
1.92%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.51
Avg Place
32.16%
Win Rate
0.00%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
5.62
Avg Place
31.46%
Win Rate
2.25%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.73
Avg Place
20.61%
Win Rate
0.76%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.74
Avg Place
27.08%
Win Rate
1.39%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 66 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 35.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 66.6% and average placement of 3.65 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Pícaro/N.O.V.A. with Twisted Fate as the primary carry, achieving a 98.6% win rate. Following closely is Meeple/Estrella oscura at 97.7% win rate, and Pícaro/N.O.V.A. at 95.7%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • Meeple/Estrella oscura (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Fizz
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Talon

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Meeple/Estrella oscura which achieves first place in 53.5% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Meeple/Estrella oscura offers the best average placement at 1.79.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 98.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Meeple/Estrella oscura: 97.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 95.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicador/Estrella oscura with a 3.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 76.0% win rate despite high contestation. Sentenciador/Estrella oscura follows at 1.5% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

FAQ de Comps TFT Set 17

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17 es Pícaro/N.O.V.A. con Twisted Fate como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 98.6% y una posición promedio de 2.16. Esta composición es efectiva para subir en clasificatoria y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo juego la composición Pícaro/N.O.V.A.?

Para jugar Pícaro/N.O.V.A., concéntrate en construir alrededor de Twisted Fate como tu carry principal. Busca Twisted Fate y unidades de apoyo temprano, prioriza objetos que tengan sinergia con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, lo que la convierte en una opción relativamente sin competencia.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias de LP consistentes en TFT Set 17, Meeple/Estrella oscura ofrece la mejor posición promedio en 1.79. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Pícaro/Meeple (2.04 avg) y Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (2.12 avg). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan los finales en bottom 4 y proporcionan un ascenso constante.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Pícaro/N.O.V.A. es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 98.6% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Poca competencia significa que puedes encontrar tus unidades naturalmente sin tener que forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo debo forzar una composición vs jugar flexible en TFT Set 17?

En TFT Set 17, Replicador/Estrella oscura tiene una tasa de selección del 3.5%, lo que significa que está muy disputada. Si ves que otros la están jugando, considera flexear hacia alternativas como Pícaro/N.O.V.A.. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos tempranos, o cuando no esté disputada. Flexea cuando veas 2+ jugadores compitiendo por las mismas unidades.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más consistente en TFT Set 17?

Meeple/Estrella oscura tiene la mejor posición promedio en 1.79, haciéndola la composición más consistente para subir. Pícaro/Meeple follows at 2.04, y Pícaro/N.O.V.A. at 2.12. Una posición promedio más baja significa menos finales en bottom 4.

¿Es la posición promedio mejor que la tasa de victoria para subir?

Para ganancias de LP consistentes, la posición promedio suele ser más confiable que la tasa de victoria pura. Una composición como Meeple/Estrella oscura con posición promedio de 1.79 minimiza las grandes pérdidas de LP por quedar en bottom 4. Las composiciones de alta varianza pueden ganar más lobbies pero también quedar octavas más seguido. Para subir, la consistencia suele ganarle a las estrategias arriesgadas.