Mayor tasa de primer lugar de composiciones TFT Double Up

Esta tabla destaca las composiciones de equipo TFT Double Up con las mayores tasas de primer lugar, perfectas para dúos que buscan maximizar sus posibilidades de victoria. Top composiciones Double Up de 8 campeones Set 17: N.O.V.A. (50.0% WR, 4.0 avg), N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), Replicator (63.0% WR, 3.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Fateweaver lidera con 50.00% de win rate y 4.00 de placement promedio. N.O.V.A. sigue con 74.19% de win rate. Analizando 68 composiciones Double Up de 8 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor comp TFT Double Up en TFT Set 17?

La mejor comp TFT Double Up en TFT Set 17 es N.O.V.A./Brawler con Viktor como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria de 74.2% y una colocación promedio de 3.37. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango con un compañero.

¿Cómo juego la comp N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up?

Para jugar N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up, coordínate con tu compañero. Concéntrate en construir alrededor de Viktor como carry principal. Esta comp tiene una tasa de selección de 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada. Coordina asistencias y objetos compartidos con tu compañero.

¿Qué comps de Double Up son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias de LP consistentes en TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler ofrece la mejor colocación promedio en 3.37. Otras opciones fiables incluyen Replicator/N.O.V.A. (prom. 3.51) y Rogue/N.O.V.A. (prom. 3.51). Coordínate con tu compañero para evitar competir por las mismas unidades.

¿Cuál es la comp TFT Double Up más fácil de jugar?

N.O.V.A./Brawler es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 74.2% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Mi compañero y yo deberíamos jugar la misma comp en Double Up?

En TFT Set 17 Double Up, generalmente es mejor jugar comps diferentes para evitar competir por unidades. Rogue/N.O.V.A. es la más popular con 2.1% de tasa de selección. Considera que tu compañero juegue N.O.V.A./Brawler como opción complementaria.