Brandvs Aphelios
Brand vs Aphelios es un matchup a decisive en LoL parche 26.4. Brand gana con un 54.5% de win rate (+9.1%) sobre Aphelios basado en 66 partidas. Brand wins the early laning phase while Aphelios scales better into the late game. A continuación encontrarás el mejor build, runas, estadísticas de línea y estrategias de Brand para el matchup Brand vs Aphelios.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Aphelios(54.5%)Who Wins the Brand vs Aphelios Matchup?
Resumen del enfrentamiento Brand vs Aphelios
El enfrentamiento Brand vs Aphelios es un enfrentamiento decisivo en el juego clasificatorio de League of Legends. Basado en 66 partidas recientes analizadas, Brand gana con una tasa de victoria del 54.5% comparado con el 45.5% de Aphelios, dando a Brand una ventaja de 9.1 puntos porcentuales. Las dinámicas de fase del juego juegan un papel crítico aquí: Brand controla la fase temprana de línea, pero Aphelios escala mejor a medida que el juego se alarga. El enfrentamiento cambia dramáticamente dependiendo de la duración del juego — Brand necesita presionar ventajas antes de que Aphelios alcance sus picos de poder, mientras Aphelios debe enfocarse en farmear seguro y alcanzar puntos clave de objetos. La brecha estadística más significativa está en control de masas, donde Brand lidera por 1.0s CC/min — una diferencia que influye fuertemente en el resultado de intercambios y escaramuzas. Los jugadores de Brand pueden elegir con confianza contra Aphelios y jugar agresivamente desde el nivel 1. Busca establecer dominio de línea temprano a través de intercambios favorables y alejar a Aphelios del CS siempre que sea posible. Entender estas dinámicas del enfrentamiento es esencial para las decisiones de selección de campeones y la estrategia durante el juego al enfrentar a este oponente de línea.
Desglose de la fase de línea Brand vs Aphelios
Aphelios está favorecido durante la fase de línea contra Brand, ganando 3 de 5 categorías estadísticas clave. Aphelios tiene ventajas en farmeo, ingresos de oro y sustain, haciéndolo el mejor en línea en este enfrentamiento.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand68.8%Aphelios31.3%Brand41.2%Aphelios58.8%Brand domina el juego temprano (primeros 15 minutos) con una comandante tasa de victoria del 68.8% — una ventaja de 37.5 puntos porcentuales sobre Aphelios. Este juego temprano desigual significa que Brand puede dictar el ritmo de la línea desde el nivel 1, controlando intercambios, estado de oleadas y prioridad del río.
Aphelios es muy superior en el juego tardío (25+ minutos), presumiendo una tasa de victoria del 58.8% — 17.6 puntos por encima de Brand. Los juegos extendidos favorecen fuertemente a Aphelios, cuyo kit y escalado los hacen una fuerza dominante en combates de equipo y control de objetivos.
Este enfrentamiento presenta un cambio de poder dramático: Brand debe presionar agresivamente su ventaja temprana y cerrar el juego antes de que Aphelios alcance sus puntos de escalado. Si Aphelios sobrevive la fase de línea sin quedarse muy atrás, el enfrentamiento se invierte a su favor. El control del Dragón y el Heraldo del Rift son fundamentales — el equipo que asegure objetivos tempranos puede hacer bola de nieve o ganar tiempo para escalar.
Best Brand Runes Against Aphelios
Dominación
Brujería
Usar Dominación primario con Brujería secundario permite a Brand presionar su ventaja contra Aphelios, amplificando las fortalezas que hacen favorable este enfrentamiento.
Datos de matchup de Brand para el parche 26.4 de League of Legends. La tabla muestra la tasa de victoria, diferencia de oro y estadisticas de rendimiento de Brand contra cada campeon en la meta actual. Haz clic en cualquier nombre de campeon para ver un desglose detallado que incluye el mejor build de Brand, runas, estadisticas de linea y analisis de early vs late game para ese matchup especifico.
Oponente | Tasa de victoria | Partidas | CS/min | Daño/min | Oro/partida | TV Temprana | TV Tardia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.67% | 407 | 2.7 | 786 | 10,924 | 40.3% | 52.4% | |
| 47.76% | 380 | 1.7 | 804 | 9,693 | 50.6% | 45.7% | |
| 55.33% | 301 | 1.8 | 829 | 10,280 | 63.7% | 49.4% | |
| 57.69% | 263 | 6.4 | 1,018 | 13,060 | 56.1% | 58.8% | |
| 53.33% | 258 | 1.8 | 852 | 10,220 | 55.5% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 246 | 2.1 | 816 | 10,373 | 54.6% | 53.1% | |
| 46.44% | 239 | 2.2 | 808 | 10,604 | 49.4% | 44.8% | |
| 48.68% | 230 | 1.7 | 850 | 10,183 | 48.9% | 48.5% | |
| 47.00% | 221 | 1.7 | 821 | 10,045 | 55.4% | 41.8% | |
| 54.59% | 207 | 3.1 | 995 | 11,518 | 61.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.32% | 205 | 2.3 | 854 | 10,385 | 47.6% | 47.1% | |
| 59.20% | 201 | 5.9 | 1,010 | 13,263 | 62.2% | 57.5% | |
| 56.82% | 177 | 1.9 | 761 | 10,593 | 56.3% | 57.1% | |
| 52.35% | 172 | 5.7 | 958 | 11,558 | 47.1% | 56.0% | |
| 47.65% | 172 | 6.1 | 1,000 | 11,157 | 52.0% | 44.2% | |
| 49.10% | 168 | 5.4 | 978 | 11,845 | 37.5% | 56.3% | |
| 49.70% | 165 | 4.0 | 861 | 11,146 | 49.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 165 | 6.5 | 1,027 | 13,389 | 63.3% | 52.4% | |
| 49.69% | 163 | 6.2 | 970 | 12,581 | 51.5% | 48.4% | |
| 49.68% | 156 | 1.7 | 800 | 9,847 | 48.4% | 50.5% | |
| 52.05% | 146 | 3.3 | 791 | 10,610 | 46.4% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 144 | 2.7 | 825 | 10,639 | 40.7% | 49.4% | |
| 50.35% | 144 | 5.3 | 965 | 12,581 | 48.1% | 51.6% | |
| 50.70% | 143 | 1.6 | 896 | 10,652 | 51.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 1.7 | 786 | 9,878 | 50.0% | 42.5% | |
| 53.03% | 135 | 1.6 | 658 | 9,379 | 57.1% | 49.3% | |
| 53.73% | 134 | 1.6 | 716 | 9,411 | 63.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 134 | 1.7 | 889 | 10,127 | 48.3% | 51.3% | |
| 51.94% | 130 | 1.8 | 730 | 9,981 | 49.0% | 53.8% | |
| 49.61% | 130 | 1.8 | 784 | 10,276 | 54.9% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 126 | 6.3 | 971 | 12,730 | 55.3% | 58.2% | |
| 50.40% | 126 | 6.0 | 963 | 12,146 | 44.7% | 53.9% | |
| 53.28% | 123 | 6.5 | 1,039 | 12,936 | 63.3% | 43.5% | |
| 61.34% | 121 | 2.1 | 1,009 | 10,705 | 63.8% | 59.7% | |
| 58.47% | 119 | 2.4 | 864 | 11,317 | 53.3% | 61.6% | |
| 44.07% | 119 | 1.8 | 815 | 9,991 | 42.2% | 45.2% | |
| 48.25% | 114 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 11,237 | 44.7% | 50.8% | |
| 55.75% | 113 | 5.8 | 924 | 12,094 | 66.7% | 45.8% | |
| 49.53% | 108 | 6.5 | 1,023 | 13,419 | 45.0% | 52.2% | |
| 38.38% | 100 | 1.7 | 828 | 9,929 | 43.9% | 34.5% | |
| 51.02% | 98 | 4.9 | 848 | 10,583 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 60.87% | 93 | 4.3 | 959 | 11,910 | 63.4% | 58.8% | |
| 48.39% | 93 | 5.6 | 999 | 11,295 | 45.2% | 51.0% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.4 | 1,052 | 13,508 | 56.4% | 52.8% | |
| 51.69% | 90 | 1.7 | 875 | 9,848 | 57.1% | 46.8% | |
| 57.47% | 87 | 2.3 | 912 | 11,215 | 54.8% | 58.9% | |
| 40.48% | 84 | 1.9 | 840 | 10,135 | 48.4% | 35.9% | |
| 41.46% | 82 | 4.8 | 839 | 11,062 | 41.4% | 41.5% | |
| 51.85% | 81 | 6.6 | 990 | 13,548 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 51.25% | 81 | 6.1 | 927 | 11,807 | 51.4% | 51.1% | |
| 47.50% | 80 | 1.9 | 863 | 10,571 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 50.63% | 80 | 4.9 | 873 | 11,167 | 46.1% | 55.0% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 5.5 | 967 | 11,937 | 57.6% | 45.6% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 1.7 | 771 | 9,851 | 58.8% | 55.0% | |
| 50.70% | 72 | 4.1 | 987 | 12,029 | 56.3% | 46.1% | |
| 52.17% | 70 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 11,834 | 34.6% | 62.8% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 3.3 | 868 | 11,837 | 48.1% | 45.2% | |
| 55.88% | 68 | 6.4 | 1,029 | 13,254 | 66.7% | 48.8% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 1.6 | 960 | 13,525 | 48.4% | 72.2% | |
| 56.72% | 67 | 6.4 | 926 | 12,896 | 58.3% | 55.8% | |
| 54.55% | 67 | 5.5 | 1,036 | 11,772 | 48.0% | 58.5% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 6.3 | 1,045 | 12,935 | 64.7% | 51.5% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,073 | 13,372 | 50.0% | 51.2% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.3 | 965 | 12,240 | 48.5% | 39.4% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 1.3 | 814 | 12,719 | 39.3% | 55.3% | |
| 54.55% | 66 | 6.6 | 1,081 | 13,235 | 68.8% | 41.2% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 4.7 | 908 | 10,613 | 38.7% | 40.0% | |
| 61.67% | 60 | 3.0 | 963 | 12,139 | 65.0% | 60.0% | |
| 49.15% | 60 | 5.6 | 924 | 12,007 | 52.4% | 47.4% | |
| 62.50% | 58 | 4.4 | 987 | 11,654 | 53.3% | 73.1% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 6.0 | 965 | 12,109 | 55.0% | 41.7% | |
| 55.77% | 53 | 4.5 | 1,010 | 11,521 | 52.2% | 58.6% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 4.2 | 918 | 10,789 | 56.5% | 43.3% | |
| 37.25% | 52 | 1.9 | 911 | 12,265 | 60.0% | 27.8% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 1.4 | 792 | 12,122 | 53.6% | 66.7% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 4.9 | 803 | 11,016 | 33.3% | 53.6% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 3.0 | 899 | 10,854 | 47.8% | 41.4% | |
| 41.18% | 51 | 1.3 | 885 | 11,920 | 40.9% | 41.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 2.1 | 1,145 | 12,596 | 47.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.10% | 50 | 6.3 | 936 | 11,863 | 52.4% | 57.1% | |
| 61.22% | 49 | 5.6 | 971 | 12,323 | 50.0% | 65.7% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 1.6 | 851 | 9,954 | 63.2% | 30.0% | |
| 35.42% | 48 | 1.9 | 842 | 10,164 | 38.1% | 33.3% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 5.7 | 951 | 12,101 | 56.3% | 56.7% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.7 | 966 | 11,318 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 5.4 | 1,023 | 11,670 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 35.56% | 45 | 4.8 | 1,079 | 10,908 | 36.8% | 34.6% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.4 | 1,119 | 11,674 | 53.3% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 6.2 | 942 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 44 | 6.5 | 1,007 | 10,591 | 53.6% | 68.8% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 2.5 | 1,029 | 12,791 | 47.1% | 34.6% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 2.1 | 879 | 12,831 | 53.9% | 43.3% | |
| 56.10% | 42 | 5.6 | 1,064 | 11,788 | 43.8% | 64.0% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 1.1 | 834 | 12,997 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 5.7 | 943 | 11,993 | 40.0% | 38.1% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.7 | 875 | 12,691 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 1.9 | 972 | 12,467 | 46.7% | 60.9% | |
| 51.35% | 38 | 3.9 | 1,037 | 12,389 | 50.0% | 52.2% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 2.1 | 826 | 11,969 | 53.9% | 48.0% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.5 | 957 | 12,029 | 66.7% | 43.5% | |
| 41.67% | 37 | 6.5 | 1,043 | 11,585 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.2 | 847 | 11,649 | 41.2% | 50.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 3.8 | 1,121 | 11,708 | 33.3% | 56.5% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 5.0 | 784 | 10,330 | 23.5% | 55.6% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 1.4 | 869 | 12,903 | 30.8% | 57.1% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.8 | 858 | 12,329 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.4 | 886 | 13,391 | 10.0% | 63.6% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 5.7 | 953 | 12,847 | 55.6% | 65.2% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.6 | 828 | 9,665 | 70.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.5 | 1,004 | 12,105 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 5.9 | 1,018 | 13,625 | 36.4% | 68.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.0 | 880 | 11,960 | 56.3% | 35.7% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 3.5 | 932 | 11,572 | 64.7% | 61.5% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.8 | 1,006 | 11,242 | 66.7% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.2 | 1,204 | 13,601 | 69.2% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 4.9 | 1,123 | 12,779 | 63.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.9 | 916 | 12,132 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 2.0 | 869 | 12,382 | 38.5% | 71.4% | |
| 52.00% | 26 | 1.1 | 808 | 11,666 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 3.9 | 1,030 | 11,778 | 44.4% | 52.9% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 1.5 | 915 | 13,109 | 37.5% | 27.8% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 1.9 | 965 | 12,483 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 4.3 | 834 | 10,520 | 53.9% | 53.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.4 | 888 | 12,285 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.8 | 860 | 11,661 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.6 | 895 | 11,321 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 24 | 3.0 | 998 | 15,059 | 66.7% | 55.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 4.1 | 1,011 | 10,545 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 23 | 6.5 | 977 | 11,609 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 2.7 | 929 | 11,707 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.3 | 1,094 | 13,572 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.4 | 1,097 | 13,163 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.7 | 843 | 13,604 | 66.7% | 43.8% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.6 | 1,018 | 13,390 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.1 | 932 | 12,800 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 977 | 12,160 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 4.3 | 896 | 12,055 | 54.5% | 70.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 793 | 11,230 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 733 | 11,058 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 823 | 9,493 | 36.4% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 1,072 | 13,456 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 0.9 | 843 | 11,565 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 1.5 | 910 | 10,905 | 44.4% | 12.5% | |
| 73.33% | 16 | 5.8 | 1,005 | 10,955 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.0 | 1,053 | 11,588 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 744 | 10,371 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 80.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 922 | 10,798 | 62.5% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.4 | 841 | 11,211 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.0 | 791 | 11,166 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.3 | 981 | 14,201 | 66.7% | 87.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,657 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.2 | 1,082 | 10,583 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 61.54% | 14 | 3.8 | 1,017 | 11,040 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.7 | 950 | 14,075 | 33.3% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.7 | 892 | 11,626 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 8.33% | 12 | 3.9 | 938 | 12,297 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 1,025 | 12,367 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 949 | 8,008 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.2 | 899 | 12,347 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 787 | 9,849 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 927 | 10,638 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 676 | 10,179 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.9 | 988 | 13,008 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 943 | 11,191 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 979 | 11,710 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 881 | 11,851 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 1,011 | 11,464 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,068 | 11,518 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 754 | 9,963 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 949 | 10,426 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
Brand vs Aphelios - Preguntas Frecuentes
Como le va a Brand contra Aphelios en League of Legends?
Brand gana el matchup de Brand vs Aphelios con una tasa de victorias de 54.5% comparado con el 45.5% de Aphelios, una diferencia de 9.1 puntos porcentuales. Estos datos se basan en 66 partidas rankeadas recientes en el parche 26.4.
Como le va a Brand contra Aphelios en el early game?
En el early game, Brand tiene la ventaja contra Aphelios con una tasa de victorias de 68.8% versus 31.3%. Los jugadores de Brand deben presionar su ventaja en linea a traves de trades agresivos y control de oleada durante los primeros 15 minutos.
Como le va a Brand contra Aphelios en el late game?
En el late game, Aphelios toma el control del matchup Brand vs Aphelios con una tasa de victorias de 58.8% comparado con 41.2%. Aphelios escala mejor en peleas de equipo y disputas de objetivos despues de los 25 minutos.
Quien gana el matchup de Brand vs Aphelios?
Brand gana el matchup contra Aphelios con una tasa de victorias de 54.5% en el parche 26.4 de League of Legends. La ventaja de 9.1 puntos porcentuales significa que Brand esta significantly favorecido en este matchup de linea basado en 66 partidas analizadas.
Cual es el mejor build de Brand contra Aphelios?
El mejor build de Brand contra Aphelios incluye optimized core items. Revisa el desglose del matchup arriba para ver la ruta completa de objetos y el orden de build.
Cuales son las mejores runas de Brand contra Aphelios?
Las mejores runas de Brand contra Aphelios usan el arbol primario Dominación con Brujería secundario. This rune setup achieves a 75.0% win rate in the Brand vs Aphelios matchup. Mira el desglose completo de runas en la comparacion de matchup arriba.
Brand contraresta a Aphelios?
Si, Brand tiene un matchup favorable contra Aphelios con una tasa de victorias de 54.5%. Brand strongly counters Aphelios en linea basado en los datos actuales del parche 26.4.
Como juego Brand contra Aphelios?
Cuando juegas Brand contra Aphelios, aprovecha tus ventajas estadisticas tradeando agresivamente durante ventanas favorables. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Construye los objetos y runas recomendados para este matchup especifico para mejores resultados.