Ząb NashoraKompozycje drużynowe TFT
Wygięty Łuk
Pas GigantaSkłady drużynowe używające Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16.4. Zobacz składy, w których jednostki carry wyposażają ten przedmiot dla maksymalnej efektywności.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Ząb Nashora as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 57 viable team comps currently building Ząb Nashora, with an average win rate of 46.46% across all compositions. The highest performing Ząb Nashora comp achieves a 88.24% win rate, primarily featuring Osiłek, Opiekun, Targon traits with Bard as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Ząb Nashora is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
        | 2.87 Avg Place | 88.24% Win Rate | 22.06% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
      | 2.58 Avg Place | 87.05% Win Rate | 25.90% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.16 Avg Place | 80.04% Win Rate | 19.55% First Place | 0.53% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 2.95 Avg Place | 79.46% Win Rate | 26.49% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.02 Avg Place | 79.15% Win Rate | 23.99% First Place | 0.59% Pick Rate | ||||
| 2.95 Avg Place | 78.45% Win Rate | 27.59% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.26 Avg Place | 76.37% Win Rate | 15.75% First Place | 0.32% Pick Rate | ||||
      | 3.65 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 19.72% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
       | 3.44 Avg Place | 72.88% Win Rate | 17.51% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.43 Avg Place | 71.67% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.56 Avg Place | 70.74% Win Rate | 15.93% First Place | 0.29% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.68 Avg Place | 69.95% Win Rate | 11.40% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.52 Avg Place | 68.12% Win Rate | 26.09% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.92 Avg Place | 59.06% Win Rate | 14.04% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 4.28 Avg Place | 58.23% Win Rate | 8.23% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.20 Avg Place | 52.14% Win Rate | 17.09% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.18 Avg Place | 52.00% Win Rate | 18.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.48 Avg Place | 51.58% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.25 Avg Place | 50.91% Win Rate | 9.09% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.44 Avg Place | 50.55% Win Rate | 8.79% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.54 Avg Place | 48.72% Win Rate | 7.18% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.40 Avg Place | 48.33% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.48 Avg Place | 47.83% Win Rate | 10.87% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.82 Avg Place | 47.62% Win Rate | 7.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.95 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 2.50% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.78 Avg Place | 46.27% Win Rate | 3.73% First Place | 0.35% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.52 Avg Place | 46.18% Win Rate | 14.37% First Place | 0.36% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.33 Avg Place | 46.15% Win Rate | 3.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.64 Avg Place | 46.12% Win Rate | 8.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.65 Avg Place | 45.35% Win Rate | 8.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.83 Avg Place | 43.41% Win Rate | 5.85% First Place | 0.22% Pick Rate | ||||
- | 4.91 Avg Place | 42.67% Win Rate | 7.41% First Place | 2.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.76 Avg Place | 41.84% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.46 Avg Place | 41.79% Win Rate | 12.69% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.69 Avg Place | 41.51% Win Rate | 6.60% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.16 Avg Place | 40.71% Win Rate | 2.65% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.15 Avg Place | 40.57% Win Rate | 1.42% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.11 Avg Place | 37.04% Win Rate | 1.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.26 Avg Place | 35.72% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.90% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.01 Avg Place | 34.82% Win Rate | 4.46% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.22 Avg Place | 34.21% Win Rate | 2.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.27 Avg Place | 34.11% Win Rate | 0.78% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.24 Avg Place | 32.35% Win Rate | 8.82% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.23 Avg Place | 30.81% Win Rate | 4.07% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.22 Avg Place | 30.43% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.00 Avg Place | 28.57% Win Rate | 12.24% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.51 Avg Place | 28.30% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.52 Avg Place | 24.84% Win Rate | 3.27% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.64 Avg Place | 24.14% Win Rate | 3.45% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.45 Avg Place | 23.44% Win Rate | 4.69% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.69 Avg Place | 22.99% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.61 Avg Place | 21.43% Win Rate | 8.93% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 6.11 Avg Place | 19.64% Win Rate | 1.79% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.99 Avg Place | 18.07% Win Rate | 3.01% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.04 Avg Place | 16.98% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 6.57 Avg Place | 13.85% Win Rate | 1.54% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.52 Avg Place | 3.85% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.
Kompozycje drużynowe Ząb Nashora - Często zadawane pytania
Jaka jest najlepsza kompozycja drużynowa dla Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16?
Najlepsza kompozycja drużynowa z Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16 osiąga 88.24% wskaźnik wygranych z 0.07% wskaźnikiem wyboru. Ta kompozycja używa cech Osiłek, Opiekun, and Targon i jest wybierana w 0.07% gier z Ząb Nashora.
Ile kompozycji drużynowych używa Ząb Nashora w TFT?
Istnieje 57 użytecznych kompozycji drużynowych, które często budują Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16. Ząb Nashora pojawia się w kompozycjach ze średnim wskaźnikiem wygranych 46.46% na podstawie 10,384 przeanalizowanych łącznych meczy.
Która kompozycja używa Ząb Nashora najczęściej w TFT?
Najpopularniejsza kompozycja dla Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16 używa cech Obrońca and Yordle z 2.06% wskaźnikiem wyboru. Ta kompozycja osiąga 42.67% wskaźnik wygranych i średnią pozycję 4.91.
Która kompozycja z Ząb Nashora ma najlepszą średnią pozycję?
Kompozycja Ząb Nashora z najlepszą średnią pozycją osiąga 2.58 z cechami Opiekun, Obrońca, and Łowczyni. Ta kompozycja ma 87.05% wskaźnik wygranych i 0.15% wskaźnik wyboru.
Które cechy dobrze współpracują z Ząb Nashora w TFT?
Najlepsze cechy, które synergizują z Ząb Nashora w TFT Set 16, to Osiłek, Opiekun, and Targon. Te kombinacje cech pojawiają się w kompozycjach drużynowych z najwyższymi wskaźnikami wygranych Ząb Nashora.