Đội hình TFT Double Up xếp hạng trung bình tốt nhất

Bảng này xếp hạng các đội hình TFT Double Up theo vị trí trung bình, cho thấy đội hình nào liên tục đạt thứ hạng cao. Top đội hình Double Up 8 tướng Mùa 17: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler dẫn đầu với 74.19% tỷ lệ thắng và 3.37 thứ hạng trung bình. N.O.V.A. theo sau với 67.65% tỷ lệ thắng. Phân tích 68 đội hình Double Up 8 tướng với thống kê hiệu suất thời gian thực.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Giúp chúng tôi duy trì độ chính xác! Nếu bạn nhận thấy thống kê không chính xác, dữ liệu thiếu hoặc bất kỳ vấn đề nào, phản hồi của bạn trực tiếp cải thiện chất lượng dữ liệu cho cả cộng đồng.

Báo cáo vấn đề

Đội hình TFT Double Up - Mùa 17 FAQ

Đội hình TFT Double Up tốt nhất trong TFT Mùa 17 là gì?

Đội hình TFT Double Up tốt nhất trong TFT Mùa 17 là N.O.V.A./Brawler với Viktor là carry chính, đạt 74.2% tỷ lệ thắng và 3.37 xếp hạng trung bình. Đội hình này hiệu quả để leo rank cùng đồng đội.

Làm sao chơi đội hình N.O.V.A./Brawler trong Double Up?

Để chơi N.O.V.A./Brawler trong Double Up, phối hợp với đồng đội. Tập trung xây dựng quanh Viktor làm carry chính. Đội hình này có 0.1% tỷ lệ chọn, làm nó trở thành lựa chọn tương đối ít tranh. Phối hợp hỗ trợ và chia sẻ trang bị với đồng đội duo.

Đội hình Double Up nào tốt để leo rank trong TFT Mùa 17?

Để tăng LP ổn định trong TFT Mùa 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler có xếp hạng trung bình tốt nhất tại 3.37. Các lựa chọn đáng tin cậy khác gồm Replicator/N.O.V.A. (TB 3.51) và Rogue/N.O.V.A. (TB 3.51). Phối hợp với đồng đội để tránh tranh giành tướng.

Đội hình TFT Double Up nào dễ chơi nhất?

N.O.V.A./Brawler là lựa chọn tuyệt vời cho người chơi muốn leo rank dễ dàng hơn. Với tỷ lệ thắng 74.2% nhưng chỉ 0.1% tỷ lệ pick, bạn ít bị tranh, làm trận đấu dễ điều hướng hơn. Ít cạnh tranh nghĩa là bạn có thể tự nhiên tìm được đơn vị mà không cần ép pivot.

Đồng đội duo và tôi có nên chơi cùng đội hình trong Double Up không?

Trong TFT Mùa 17 Double Up, thường tốt hơn nên chơi các đội hình khác nhau để tránh tranh giành tướng. Rogue/N.O.V.A. phổ biến nhất với 2.1% tỷ lệ chọn. Cân nhắc để đồng đội chơi N.O.V.A./Brawler như một lựa chọn bổ sung.