Diese Tabelle ordnet TFT Set 16 Teamkompositionen nach ihrer durchschnittlichen Platzierung und zeigt, welche Comps konsistent Top-Platzierungen erreichen. Top 8-Champion Set 16 Kompositionen: Beschützer (88.9% WR, 2.6 Ø), Beschützer (82.9% WR, 2.6 Ø), Moloch (81.3% WR, 2.8 Ø). Beschützer/Verteidiger führt mit 88.89% Siegesrate und 2.58 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Beschützer folgt mit 82.86% Siegesrate. Analyse von 74 8-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Traits | Avg | Win | First | Pick | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
        | 2.58 Avg Place | 88.89% Win Rate | 36.11% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 2.60 Avg Place | 82.86% Win Rate | 31.43% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
      | 2.77 Avg Place | 81.25% Win Rate | 32.14% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.12 Avg Place | 79.10% Win Rate | 19.21% First Place | 0.56% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.15 Avg Place | 78.87% Win Rate | 16.49% First Place | 0.31% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 3.15 Avg Place | 80.00% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
    | 3.22 Avg Place | 78.13% Win Rate | 18.75% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 3.38 Avg Place | 74.46% Win Rate | 16.31% First Place | 0.52% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.40 Avg Place | 73.61% Win Rate | 13.89% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.42 Avg Place | 74.10% Win Rate | 12.65% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.52 Avg Place | 62.50% Win Rate | 16.67% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.74 Avg Place | 66.67% Win Rate | 18.52% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.77 Avg Place | 64.34% Win Rate | 11.63% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 3.83 Avg Place | 63.12% Win Rate | 17.02% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.83 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 9.86% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.83 Avg Place | 66.96% Win Rate | 13.04% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.89 Avg Place | 58.33% Win Rate | 19.44% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.90 Avg Place | 75.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 3.93 Avg Place | 57.14% Win Rate | 17.86% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.03 Avg Place | 56.25% Win Rate | 12.50% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.05 Avg Place | 70.00% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.09 Avg Place | 55.88% Win Rate | 20.59% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.29 Avg Place | 58.12% Win Rate | 6.84% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.33 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.37 Avg Place | 65.12% Win Rate | 2.33% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.37 Avg Place | 52.67% Win Rate | 8.67% First Place | 0.24% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.40 Avg Place | 54.79% Win Rate | 5.48% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.40 Avg Place | 40.00% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.41 Avg Place | 59.18% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.43 Avg Place | 48.57% Win Rate | 11.43% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.53 Avg Place | 54.05% Win Rate | 3.24% First Place | 0.30% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.54 Avg Place | 46.84% Win Rate | 13.50% First Place | 0.38% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.56 Avg Place | 55.56% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.60 Avg Place | 42.50% Win Rate | 17.50% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.63 Avg Place | 46.99% Win Rate | 7.83% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.65 Avg Place | 50.00% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.70 Avg Place | 48.57% Win Rate | 10.00% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.76 Avg Place | 42.86% Win Rate | 2.86% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.79 Avg Place | 40.00% Win Rate | 2.86% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.79 Avg Place | 44.10% Win Rate | 8.07% First Place | 0.26% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.89 Avg Place | 37.59% Win Rate | 8.27% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.91 Avg Place | 50.67% Win Rate | 8.00% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.92 Avg Place | 38.89% Win Rate | 2.78% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.96 Avg Place | 39.13% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.97 Avg Place | 41.38% Win Rate | 1.72% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.97 Avg Place | 40.34% Win Rate | 5.88% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.98 Avg Place | 39.19% Win Rate | 4.73% First Place | 0.24% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.99 Avg Place | 41.77% Win Rate | 3.80% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.00 Avg Place | 36.23% Win Rate | 4.35% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.03 Avg Place | 43.24% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
- | 5.12 Avg Place | 38.97% Win Rate | 6.64% First Place | 2.02% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.13 Avg Place | 43.75% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.14 Avg Place | 28.57% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 5.17 Avg Place | 27.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.19 Avg Place | 35.90% Win Rate | 5.13% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.20 Avg Place | 35.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.21 Avg Place | 34.06% Win Rate | 4.74% First Place | 0.88% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.21 Avg Place | 26.32% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.37 Avg Place | 30.77% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.38 Avg Place | 35.42% Win Rate | 4.17% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.42 Avg Place | 30.30% Win Rate | 6.06% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.48 Avg Place | 26.23% Win Rate | 1.64% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.50 Avg Place | 27.78% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.53 Avg Place | 23.26% Win Rate | 2.33% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.71 Avg Place | 29.27% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.71 Avg Place | 29.60% Win Rate | 1.60% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.78 Avg Place | 11.11% Win Rate | 5.56% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.85 Avg Place | 5.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.86 Avg Place | 28.07% Win Rate | 3.51% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.94 Avg Place | 11.11% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.00 Avg Place | 5.26% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.09 Avg Place | 15.63% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 6.21 Avg Place | 11.65% Win Rate | 2.91% First Place | 0.16% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.79 Avg Place | 8.20% Win Rate | 1.64% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Set 16 Komps FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 16?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 16 ist Beschützer/Verteidiger mit Aphelios als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 88.9% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.58. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.
Wie spiele ich die Beschützer/Verteidiger Komposition?
Um Beschützer/Verteidiger zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Aphelios als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Aphelios und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set 16?
Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 16 bietet Beschützer/Verteidiger die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 2.58. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind Beschützer/Verteidiger (2.60 avg) und Moloch/Unterbrecher (2.77 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?
Beschützer/Verteidiger ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 88.9%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.
Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16 hat Verteidiger/Yordle eine Spielrate von 2.0%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Beschützer/Verteidiger. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.
Was ist die konstanteste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 16?
Beschützer/Verteidiger hat die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung von 2.58, was sie zur konstantesten Komposition zum Aufsteigen macht. Beschützer/Verteidiger follows at 2.60 und Moloch/Unterbrecher at 2.77. Niedrigere durchschnittliche Platzierung bedeutet weniger Bottom-4-Platzierungen.
Ist durchschnittliche Platzierung besser als Siegrate zum Aufsteigen?
Fur konstante LP-Gewinne ist die durchschnittliche Platzierung oft zuverlassiger als reine Siegrate. Eine Komposition wie Beschützer/Verteidiger mit 2.58 durchschnittlicher Platzierung minimiert grosse LP-Verluste durch Bottom-4-Platzierungen. Hochvarianz-Kompositionen gewinnen vielleicht mehr Lobbys, aber landen auch ofter auf Platz 8. Zum Aufsteigen schlagt Konstanz normalerweise Coinflip-Strategien.