- Win Rate
- 47.9%
- Matches
- 2,809
- KDA
- 2.99
Paradox vs Shiv vs Shiv
- Skill Level
- All Skill Levels
- Matches
- 38,500
- Version
- 6860
- Last Updated
- Nov 7, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Paradox faces a challenging 47.9% win rate against Shiv in this Deadlock matchup. Data from 2,809 games shows Paradox averages -0.6 more deaths. Focus on safe farming, team coordination, and avoiding 1v1 confrontations.
Paradox Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Paradox performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.
Who Wins the Paradox vs Shiv Matchup?
Paradox vs Shiv Matchup Summary
The Paradox vs Shiv matchup in Deadlock is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 2,809 recent matches analyzed, Shiv wins with a 52.1% win rate compared to Paradox's 47.9%, giving Shiv a 4.2 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Paradox consistently outperforms. Shiv holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. Paradox players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.
Paradox vs Shiv Combat Analysis
Paradox claims 4 out of 5 combat metrics in the Paradox vs Shiv matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 2,809 ranked games reveals Paradox consistently outperforms Shiv in direct combat scenarios. While Shiv manages to win one metric, the overall picture favors Paradox in fights. Shiv players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Paradox dominates.
Paradox vs Shiv Economy Analysis
Paradox generates approximately 536 more souls than Shiv on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Paradox a mid-game advantage. Paradox secures more last hits (60.8 vs 46.4), while Paradox leads in denies (2.0 vs 1.7). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.
Recommended Items for Paradox vs Shiv
Paradox Build vs Shiv
This optimized build for Paradox against Shiv is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 52.1% win rate disadvantage against Shiv, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Haunting Shot, Glass Cannon, Mystic Reverb, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 38,799 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.
Shiv Build vs Paradox
Shiv's recommended build against Paradox leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Shiv, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Cloak of Opportunity, Mystic Shot, Juggernaut, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 28,399 souls Understanding Shiv's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.
These item builds are optimized for the Paradox vs Shiv matchup based on win rate data from 2,809 competitive matches. Item choices in Deadlock significantly impact matchup outcomes — the right build can help overcome statistical disadvantages or extend existing advantages. Remember to adapt your build based on game state, team compositions, enemy itemization, and whether you're ahead or behind in souls.
Build the best team around Paradox
Comp Lab scores every pair on your team by real win rate across hundreds of thousands of matches, checks your picks against the enemy roster, and loads proven high-win-rate comps.
- Six-hero team board
- Pair synergy win rates
- Proven high-win comps
Paradox has favorable matchups against 3 heroes and unfavorable matchups against 40 heroes in Deadlock. Paradox's strongest matchup is against The Doorman with a 51.8% win rate. The hardest matchup is Graves at 34.8% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and build recommendations.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Player DMG | Net Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.76% | 4,116 | 2.78 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 28,322 | 35,281 | |
| 37.53% | 4,090 | 2.55 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 24,121 | 34,382 | |
| 36.44% | 4,089 | 2.68 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 24,487 | 34,190 | |
| 42.86% | 3,983 | 2.72 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 27,501 | 35,077 | |
| 42.36% | 3,860 | 2.78 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 27,384 | 33,988 | |
| 46.42% | 3,845 | 2.80 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 27,563 | 34,970 | |
| 34.79% | 3,590 | 2.63 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 25,464 | 34,628 | |
| 45.50% | 3,253 | 2.86 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 26,769 | 34,991 | |
| 43.60% | 3,195 | 2.60 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 27,679 | 34,602 | |
| 43.24% | 3,187 | 2.75 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 27,586 | 34,888 | |
| 44.89% | 3,099 | 2.71 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 27,023 | 35,388 | |
| 35.37% | 3,076 | 2.64 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 24,347 | 34,750 | |
| 49.37% | 2,878 | 2.88 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 27,713 | 35,560 | |
| 45.91% | 2,862 | 2.72 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 27,261 | 35,116 | |
| 45.81% | 2,816 | 2.82 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 26,870 | 34,723 | |
| 47.88% | 2,809 | 2.99 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 26,785 | 35,310 | |
| 44.57% | 2,737 | 2.69 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 26,428 | 34,742 | |
| 47.83% | 2,695 | 2.88 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 26,709 | 35,607 | |
| 46.70% | 2,664 | 2.79 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 26,952 | 35,402 | |
| 41.58% | 2,624 | 2.92 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 27,309 | 35,841 | |
| 39.98% | 2,494 | 2.65 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 27,462 | 35,182 | |
| 48.45% | 2,477 | 2.84 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 27,369 | 35,851 | |
| 48.36% | 2,413 | 2.83 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 26,650 | 34,961 | |
| 44.19% | 2,351 | 2.76 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 26,723 | 35,040 | |
| 44.22% | 2,239 | 2.79 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 26,852 | 35,100 | |
| 48.57% | 2,172 | 2.82 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 28,246 | 35,934 | |
| 49.10% | 2,010 | 2.81 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 27,706 | 35,367 | |
| 42.56% | 2,002 | 2.85 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 27,175 | 34,708 | |
| 49.32% | 1,835 | 2.85 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 27,546 | 35,735 | |
| 41.03% | 1,828 | 2.78 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 27,251 | 34,895 | |
| 46.14% | 1,697 | 2.96 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 28,218 | 36,042 | |
| 47.75% | 1,688 | 2.76 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 28,841 | 34,778 | |
| 42.71% | 1,604 | 2.76 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 24,980 | 35,307 | |
| 43.79% | 1,434 | 2.76 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 27,896 | 35,012 | |
| 41.27% | 1,432 | 2.81 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 27,737 | 34,753 | |
| 48.42% | 1,427 | 2.78 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 27,443 | 35,411 | |
| 38.15% | 1,418 | 2.58 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 24,447 | 33,080 | |
| 48.11% | 1,405 | 2.92 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 26,651 | 35,367 | |
| 47.15% | 1,368 | 2.97 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 24,537 | 34,138 | |
| 44.09% | 1,345 | 2.98 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 25,745 | 35,282 | |
| 51.75% | 1,341 | 3.03 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 27,718 | 36,562 | |
| 51.42% | 1,233 | 3.03 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 27,451 | 35,417 | |
| 50.36% | 985 | 3.04 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 25,307 | 34,739 | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Paradox Matchups - FAQ
What is Paradox's best matchup in Deadlock?
Paradox's best matchup is against The Doorman, achieving a 51.8% win rate. Paradox excels in this matchup through superior combat stats and favorable ability interactions.
What is Paradox's hardest matchup?
Paradox's hardest matchup is against Graves, with only a 34.8% win rate. Against this opponent, Paradox should focus on team coordination and itemizing defensively.
How many favorable matchups does Paradox have?
Paradox has 3 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 40 unfavorable matchups in Deadlock. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better hero picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Paradox in difficult matchups?
When playing Paradox in difficult matchups, prioritize safe farming, positioning, and team coordination. Adjust your item build to compensate for the matchup disadvantage, and look for opportunities to impact fights through abilities rather than direct confrontation.
What stats should I focus on in Paradox's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Paradox's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average player damage, and net worth difference. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more defensively and relying on team support.