
Amumuvs Xin Zhao
Amumu vs Xin Zhao is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Xin Zhao wins with a 51.5% win rate (+3.0%) over Amumu based on 66 games. Amumu wins the early laning phase while Xin Zhao scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Amumu build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Amumu Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Amumu performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao Matchup?

Amumu vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 66 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 51.5% win rate compared to Amumu's 48.5%, giving Xin Zhao a 3.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Amumu controls the early laning stage, but Xin Zhao outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Amumu needs to press advantages before Xin Zhao reaches their power spikes, while Xin Zhao should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Amumu leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Xin Zhao is slightly favored, Amumu can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Xin Zhao's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Amumu vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Amumu, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Amumu Build Against Xin Zhao
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Amumu needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Amumu against Xin Zhao are Abyssal Mask, Jak'Sho, The Protean and Liandry's Torment. This combination gives Amumu an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Amumu and Xin Zhao, with Amumu holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Xin Zhao is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 52.8% win rate — 5.6 points above Amumu. Extended games heavily favor Xin Zhao, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Amumu has the edge early, but Xin Zhao gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Amumu Runes Against Xin Zhao
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Amumu the best tools to compete against Xin Zhao in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Amumu matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Amumu's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Amumu build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.02% | 153 | 0.9 | 588 | 11,424 | 48.6% | 49.4% | |
| 46.71% | 152 | 0.9 | 615 | 11,936 | 41.5% | 50.6% | |
| 53.85% | 130 | 0.8 | 647 | 11,894 | 53.5% | 54.2% | |
| 42.31% | 130 | 0.9 | 636 | 11,789 | 32.8% | 50.7% | |
| 41.41% | 128 | 0.9 | 643 | 11,907 | 36.4% | 45.2% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 0.9 | 627 | 12,275 | 55.6% | 54.3% | |
| 47.62% | 105 | 0.9 | 622 | 11,964 | 40.8% | 53.6% | |
| 49.51% | 103 | 1.0 | 731 | 11,424 | 51.2% | 48.3% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 0.9 | 596 | 12,445 | 53.6% | 56.6% | |
| 51.28% | 78 | 0.8 | 566 | 11,422 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 41.10% | 73 | 0.8 | 583 | 10,667 | 34.2% | 48.6% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 0.9 | 646 | 11,491 | 50.0% | 47.2% | |
| 38.10% | 63 | 1.0 | 674 | 11,601 | 34.5% | 41.2% | |
| 57.89% | 57 | 0.9 | 657 | 12,133 | 47.4% | 63.2% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 0.9 | 711 | 12,348 | 52.2% | 53.1% | |
| 57.41% | 54 | 0.9 | 562 | 11,558 | 56.0% | 58.6% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 1.0 | 645 | 11,713 | 51.9% | 54.2% | |
| 60.00% | 50 | 0.8 | 629 | 11,985 | 52.4% | 65.5% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 0.8 | 597 | 10,818 | 63.2% | 32.3% | |
| 63.04% | 46 | 1.0 | 758 | 12,920 | 46.7% | 71.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 0.9 | 600 | 11,689 | 44.4% | 59.3% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 1.0 | 634 | 11,626 | 37.5% | 44.0% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 0.9 | 673 | 12,645 | 53.9% | 64.3% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 0.9 | 536 | 11,590 | 63.2% | 52.4% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.0 | 616 | 11,253 | 40.0% | 65.0% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 0.9 | 537 | 10,525 | 35.0% | 42.1% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.0 | 690 | 11,871 | 61.1% | 30.0% | |
| 60.53% | 38 | 1.0 | 730 | 12,642 | 63.6% | 59.3% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 1.0 | 714 | 12,298 | 52.9% | 36.8% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 1.0 | 676 | 12,648 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.0 | 546 | 11,596 | 26.7% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.0 | 663 | 12,338 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.0 | 657 | 12,965 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 0.9 | 606 | 12,546 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 0.8 | 584 | 10,224 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 0.8 | 583 | 11,553 | 71.4% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 0.8 | 686 | 12,206 | 45.5% | 52.6% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 0.9 | 663 | 13,089 | 53.9% | 35.3% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 1.0 | 674 | 11,276 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.0 | 543 | 10,856 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 1.1 | 642 | 12,563 | 55.6% | 73.3% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.0 | 662 | 11,282 | 60.0% | 23.1% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 0.9 | 644 | 12,233 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.3 | 565 | 12,165 | 88.9% | 38.5% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 0.9 | 659 | 11,258 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.4 | 606 | 12,861 | 83.3% | 53.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.1 | 695 | 13,924 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.0 | 684 | 12,951 | 20.0% | 64.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.2 | 555 | 11,492 | 44.4% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 0.8 | 606 | 11,345 | 42.9% | 54.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 0.9 | 565 | 11,553 | 50.0% | 69.2% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.3 | 508 | 8,193 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 82.35% | 17 | 1.4 | 385 | 9,160 | 83.3% | 80.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.0 | 605 | 10,877 | 30.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.2 | 385 | 8,253 | 71.4% | 55.6% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.4 | 491 | 9,765 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 441 | 9,583 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 0.8 | 670 | 11,667 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 0.8 | 604 | 11,719 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 0.7 | 730 | 10,697 | 44.4% | 60.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.1 | 548 | 12,172 | 33.3% | 70.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.4 | 617 | 13,173 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.9 | 737 | 11,539 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.1 | 494 | 10,797 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.2 | 518 | 8,972 | 55.6% | 0.0% | |
| 8.33% | 12 | 0.9 | 639 | 12,013 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.1 | 473 | 10,652 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.4 | 648 | 11,535 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 459 | 8,182 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 449 | 9,278 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.1 | 525 | 10,392 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 0.7 | 622 | 10,547 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 619 | 11,803 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.3 | 519 | 10,433 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 543 | 10,805 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 405 | 7,610 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 426 | 9,393 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 0.8 | 445 | 9,593 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.3 | 464 | 9,980 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.4 | 480 | 7,700 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.3 | 475 | 10,205 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.2 | 582 | 11,330 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.1 | 606 | 12,739 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 689 | 12,977 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.2 | 732 | 13,731 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 677 | 12,741 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.1 | 504 | 9,802 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 615 | 11,750 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 737 | 13,250 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 473 | 10,161 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Amumu vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 51.5% win rate compared to Amumu's 48.5%, a 3.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 66 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Amumu has the advantage against Xin Zhao with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Amumu players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Xin Zhao takes over the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 52.8% win rate compared to 47.2%. Xin Zhao scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Amumu with a 51.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 3.0 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 66 games analyzed.
What is the best Amumu build against Xin Zhao?
The best Amumu build against Xin Zhao includes Abyssal Mask, Jak'Sho, The Protean, Liandry's Torment with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Amumu runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Amumu runes against Xin Zhao use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Amumu counter Xin Zhao?
No, Amumu struggles against Xin Zhao with only a 48.5% win rate. Xin Zhao has the advantage in this matchup. Amumu players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Xin Zhao's lead.
How do I play Amumu against Xin Zhao?
When playing Amumu against Xin Zhao, play cautiously and avoid Xin Zhao's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Xin Zhao has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.