Amumuvs Xin Zhao
Amumu vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Amumu wins with a 55.5% win rate (+10.9%) over Xin Zhao based on 110 games. Amumu holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Amumu build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Amumu Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Amumu performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Amumu vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 110 recent matches analyzed, Amumu wins with a 55.5% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 44.5%, giving Amumu a 10.9 percentage point advantage. Amumu dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Xin Zhao players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Amumu leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Amumu players can confidently pick into Xin Zhao and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Xin Zhao away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Amumu vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Amumu, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Amumu Build Against Xin Zhao
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Amumu needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Amumu against Xin Zhao are Abyssal Mask, Liandry's Torment and Thornmail. This combination gives Amumu an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 9 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Amumu55.3%
Xin Zhao44.7%Amumu55.6%Xin Zhao44.4%Amumu dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.3% win rate — a 10.6 percentage point lead over Xin Zhao. This lopsided early game means Amumu can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Amumu is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.6% win rate — 11.1 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Amumu, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Amumu holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Xin Zhao players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Amumu Runes Against Xin Zhao
Precision
Domination
Running Precision primary with Domination secondary allows Amumu to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Amumu matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Amumu's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Amumu build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.60% | 251 | 0.8 | 611 | 11,714 | 53.1% | 49.0% | |
| 49.00% | 200 | 0.9 | 585 | 11,148 | 49.5% | 48.6% | |
| 47.83% | 184 | 0.9 | 564 | 11,572 | 53.8% | 43.3% | |
| 46.70% | 182 | 1.0 | 628 | 11,730 | 38.6% | 51.8% | |
| 53.89% | 167 | 0.8 | 621 | 11,282 | 48.8% | 58.6% | |
| 45.71% | 140 | 0.9 | 564 | 11,128 | 46.1% | 45.3% | |
| 47.66% | 128 | 0.9 | 607 | 11,020 | 43.3% | 52.5% | |
| 57.26% | 124 | 0.9 | 584 | 11,052 | 54.5% | 59.4% | |
| 57.76% | 116 | 0.8 | 591 | 11,358 | 56.4% | 59.0% | |
| 55.45% | 110 | 0.9 | 694 | 11,948 | 55.3% | 55.6% | |
| 52.29% | 109 | 0.9 | 582 | 11,474 | 52.4% | 52.2% | |
| 49.50% | 101 | 1.1 | 593 | 11,430 | 40.9% | 56.1% | |
| 60.61% | 99 | 0.9 | 548 | 11,137 | 59.6% | 61.5% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 0.7 | 583 | 11,199 | 64.1% | 45.7% | |
| 54.93% | 71 | 0.8 | 628 | 11,464 | 51.5% | 57.9% | |
| 47.14% | 70 | 1.0 | 616 | 11,928 | 40.0% | 51.1% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 0.8 | 669 | 11,652 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 0.9 | 591 | 10,972 | 40.0% | 54.0% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 0.9 | 687 | 12,883 | 47.6% | 63.0% | |
| 61.90% | 63 | 0.9 | 647 | 11,559 | 60.9% | 62.5% | |
| 70.00% | 60 | 0.9 | 614 | 12,988 | 63.2% | 73.2% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 0.9 | 569 | 11,736 | 59.1% | 56.8% | |
| 55.17% | 58 | 0.8 | 573 | 10,815 | 56.7% | 53.6% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 0.8 | 609 | 10,426 | 56.0% | 44.4% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 1.0 | 665 | 11,744 | 64.7% | 41.2% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 0.9 | 571 | 10,629 | 42.1% | 59.4% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 0.9 | 631 | 12,156 | 52.6% | 54.8% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 1.0 | 619 | 11,938 | 47.6% | 60.7% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 0.9 | 617 | 12,076 | 53.3% | 48.5% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 0.7 | 628 | 11,183 | 38.9% | 37.9% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 0.8 | 610 | 11,646 | 71.4% | 57.7% | |
| 64.44% | 45 | 0.8 | 626 | 11,745 | 52.6% | 73.1% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 0.9 | 617 | 11,150 | 38.1% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 1.1 | 648 | 13,086 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 1.0 | 575 | 10,870 | 57.1% | 52.4% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 0.9 | 627 | 11,072 | 60.0% | 43.8% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.2 | 444 | 9,010 | 53.9% | 38.9% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.4 | 451 | 9,265 | 69.2% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 0.9 | 576 | 11,668 | 63.6% | 17.6% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.3 | 459 | 8,535 | 42.9% | 64.3% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.5 | 424 | 8,835 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 1.1 | 610 | 11,640 | 50.0% | 47.4% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.0 | 612 | 14,400 | 83.3% | 52.4% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 0.8 | 502 | 11,560 | 72.7% | 43.8% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.2 | 606 | 11,334 | 54.5% | 66.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.2 | 483 | 8,649 | 41.7% | 46.1% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 1.4 | 477 | 9,965 | 75.0% | 52.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 540 | 9,342 | 41.7% | 46.1% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.0 | 596 | 11,509 | 54.5% | 33.3% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 0.8 | 638 | 9,715 | 36.4% | 58.3% | |
| 27.27% | 22 | 1.5 | 458 | 9,484 | 37.5% | 21.4% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.0 | 639 | 12,540 | 33.3% | 53.9% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 0.9 | 618 | 11,947 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 0.8 | 635 | 12,507 | 77.8% | 54.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 0.8 | 624 | 12,489 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 1.0 | 732 | 12,627 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.2 | 615 | 11,252 | 33.3% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 0.8 | 580 | 9,269 | 77.8% | 22.2% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 0.9 | 569 | 10,672 | 22.2% | 55.6% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 0.9 | 624 | 12,109 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.4 | 414 | 9,113 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.0 | 554 | 10,911 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.1 | 711 | 12,450 | 75.0% | 41.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.1 | 378 | 7,815 | 30.0% | 80.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.4 | 592 | 9,443 | 42.9% | 12.5% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.2 | 544 | 8,990 | 57.1% | 87.5% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 0.8 | 630 | 11,505 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 0.9 | 588 | 11,584 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.0 | 678 | 12,732 | 20.0% | 62.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 0.8 | 649 | 10,195 | 85.7% | 33.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.4 | 451 | 7,669 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.1 | 603 | 11,207 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.3 | 473 | 8,837 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.2 | 493 | 9,225 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 0.9 | 513 | 10,787 | 33.3% | 22.2% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.3 | 455 | 9,645 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 551 | 8,892 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 0.7 | 573 | 11,575 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 515 | 8,131 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 484 | 9,518 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 0.9 | 651 | 8,801 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.5 | 468 | 9,275 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.1 | 584 | 12,984 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.2 | 368 | 7,322 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.0 | 622 | 11,170 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 0.7 | 555 | 11,836 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.5 | 522 | 7,850 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 8 | 1.5 | 663 | 9,901 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.3 | 265 | 5,649 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.0 | 337 | 7,744 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 0.9 | 797 | 15,095 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 422 | 9,142 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 713 | 10,617 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 244 | 7,654 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 640 | 10,654 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 611 | 9,472 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Amumu vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Amumu wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 55.5% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 44.5%, a 10.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 110 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Amumu has the advantage against Xin Zhao with a 55.3% win rate versus 44.7%. Amumu players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Amumu do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Amumu takes over the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to 44.4%. Amumu scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Amumu wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 55.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 10.9 percentage point advantage means Amumu is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 110 games analyzed.
What is the best Amumu build against Xin Zhao?
The best Amumu build against Xin Zhao includes Abyssal Mask, Liandry's Torment, Thornmail with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Amumu runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Amumu runes against Xin Zhao use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 55.6% win rate in the Amumu vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Amumu counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Amumu has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 55.5% win rate. Amumu strongly counters Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Amumu against Xin Zhao?
When playing Amumu against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.