Aniviavs Karma
Anivia vs Karma is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Karma wins with a 56.3% win rate (+12.5%) over Anivia based on 16 games. Anivia wins the early laning phase while Karma scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Karma matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Karma Matchup?
Anivia vs Karma Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Karma matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 16 recent matches analyzed, Karma wins with a 56.3% win rate compared to Anivia's 43.8%, giving Karma a 12.5 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Anivia controls the early laning stage, but Karma outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Anivia needs to press advantages before Karma reaches their power spikes, while Karma should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Anivia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Karma has a strong advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Karma overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Karma Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Karma, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Karma
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Karma, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Karma are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Bandlepipes. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Karma. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Karma matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia57.1%Karma42.9%Anivia33.3%Karma66.7%Anivia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 57.1% win rate — a 14.3 percentage point lead over Karma. This lopsided early game means Anivia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Karma is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Anivia. Extended games heavily favor Karma, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Anivia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Karma reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Karma survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Anivia Runes Against Karma
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Anivia the best tools to compete against Karma in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.09% | 131 | 6.5 | 723 | 10,995 | 44.6% | 51.5% | |
| 47.29% | 129 | 6.8 | 682 | 11,632 | 47.1% | 47.4% | |
| 42.24% | 116 | 6.4 | 780 | 10,447 | 45.3% | 39.7% | |
| 48.08% | 104 | 4.7 | 667 | 11,306 | 52.4% | 45.2% | |
| 45.63% | 103 | 6.6 | 661 | 10,998 | 44.7% | 46.4% | |
| 50.49% | 103 | 6.7 | 717 | 10,883 | 54.5% | 47.5% | |
| 50.54% | 93 | 6.2 | 696 | 11,345 | 52.9% | 49.1% | |
| 55.91% | 93 | 6.6 | 716 | 11,372 | 58.5% | 53.9% | |
| 51.69% | 89 | 6.5 | 769 | 11,126 | 50.0% | 52.7% | |
| 57.95% | 88 | 6.4 | 836 | 11,548 | 65.6% | 53.6% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 6.4 | 754 | 11,698 | 46.9% | 42.5% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 6.7 | 873 | 10,795 | 56.3% | 46.5% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.6 | 772 | 11,599 | 44.0% | 43.9% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.4 | 680 | 11,107 | 61.5% | 32.5% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 4.6 | 715 | 11,647 | 30.0% | 48.8% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 2.5 | 532 | 9,702 | 48.0% | 48.6% | |
| 58.33% | 60 | 5.8 | 781 | 12,113 | 63.6% | 55.3% | |
| 35.59% | 59 | 6.3 | 693 | 11,397 | 35.0% | 35.9% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.6 | 809 | 12,023 | 60.0% | 47.2% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 6.7 | 697 | 10,464 | 51.9% | 46.4% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 6.6 | 750 | 10,785 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.4 | 639 | 10,372 | 57.1% | 51.6% | |
| 62.75% | 51 | 6.9 | 786 | 11,210 | 54.2% | 70.4% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.3 | 721 | 11,128 | 43.5% | 44.4% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 6.5 | 804 | 10,687 | 47.8% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 6.9 | 760 | 11,186 | 36.8% | 59.3% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.3 | 640 | 10,172 | 56.5% | 45.5% | |
| 34.09% | 44 | 6.6 | 715 | 10,943 | 45.0% | 25.0% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 2.3 | 575 | 10,093 | 42.1% | 68.0% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 6.6 | 673 | 10,899 | 56.3% | 60.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 6.4 | 731 | 10,566 | 41.2% | 54.5% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 6.4 | 811 | 11,943 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 6.5 | 717 | 10,241 | 52.6% | 31.6% | |
| 41.67% | 37 | 1.9 | 671 | 10,501 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.3 | 733 | 10,951 | 58.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 2.3 | 573 | 9,249 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 3.0 | 611 | 10,241 | 53.9% | 40.9% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.9 | 510 | 9,107 | 50.0% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 7.1 | 999 | 12,183 | 72.7% | 52.2% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.7 | 746 | 10,493 | 58.8% | 47.1% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.2 | 705 | 10,967 | 41.2% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 7.0 | 776 | 12,198 | 45.5% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.6 | 830 | 12,962 | 62.5% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 4.9 | 654 | 10,498 | 62.5% | 37.5% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 6.8 | 698 | 10,637 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 7.1 | 877 | 11,416 | 56.3% | 40.0% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 3.4 | 635 | 11,010 | 80.0% | 47.6% | |
| 73.33% | 30 | 6.3 | 736 | 11,611 | 70.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,693 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.5 | 833 | 11,150 | 58.3% | 47.1% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.3 | 920 | 11,431 | 33.3% | 52.6% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 6.7 | 743 | 10,901 | 62.5% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.4 | 814 | 11,587 | 77.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.0 | 643 | 10,476 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.7 | 773 | 12,044 | 60.0% | 56.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 3.3 | 774 | 10,752 | 57.1% | 52.6% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.4 | 486 | 9,675 | 44.4% | 29.4% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.2 | 793 | 9,975 | 46.1% | 53.9% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.6 | 641 | 9,679 | 27.3% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 6.9 | 810 | 11,110 | 36.4% | 42.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 934 | 12,559 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.3 | 801 | 10,793 | 70.0% | 35.7% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.6 | 738 | 10,886 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.4 | 804 | 13,501 | 50.0% | 43.8% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.8 | 624 | 10,303 | 75.0% | 53.3% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.6 | 789 | 13,033 | 60.0% | 30.8% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 6.5 | 758 | 11,618 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.8 | 751 | 10,753 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.9 | 512 | 9,059 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.5 | 799 | 10,973 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.7 | 813 | 12,536 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.1 | 677 | 11,432 | 90.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 746 | 10,980 | 75.0% | 41.7% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 557 | 9,775 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.9 | 623 | 10,621 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.8 | 781 | 11,993 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.4 | 637 | 11,717 | 55.6% | 30.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 3.6 | 590 | 8,667 | 54.5% | 75.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.1 | 730 | 12,028 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.1 | 646 | 9,504 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.7 | 881 | 10,930 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.6 | 735 | 10,947 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.2 | 735 | 11,986 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.1 | 704 | 10,615 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 7.2 | 900 | 14,213 | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.2 | 650 | 11,092 | 25.0% | 61.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 468 | 8,136 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.6 | 852 | 11,724 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.3 | 603 | 9,581 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.5 | 661 | 10,587 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.2 | 681 | 11,082 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.9 | 789 | 12,428 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.7 | 676 | 9,787 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.5 | 597 | 9,269 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.0 | 426 | 9,629 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.2 | 631 | 9,552 | 83.3% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 7.0 | 748 | 11,734 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.7 | 680 | 10,312 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.8 | 699 | 9,653 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 5.9 | 736 | 9,904 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.2 | 595 | 8,354 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.5 | 795 | 12,114 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.8 | 697 | 10,341 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.6 | 502 | 8,744 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.6 | 643 | 9,156 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 722 | 11,376 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 7.8 | 1,185 | 13,175 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.9 | 532 | 10,071 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.8 | 623 | 10,400 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 719 | 11,687 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.3 | 656 | 11,756 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.2 | 676 | 12,228 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 606 | 9,073 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 596 | 11,601 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 633 | 10,548 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 668 | 12,096 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 758 | 10,448 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.6 | 937 | 12,475 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.4 | 660 | 8,989 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.5 | 1,101 | 13,357 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 641 | 10,654 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 850 | 9,437 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 532 | 7,985 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 698 | 10,649 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 827 | 10,880 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 785 | 16,861 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 725 | 11,034 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 519 | 7,864 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 787 | 13,449 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 850 | 14,489 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 786 | 8,576 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 714 | 13,541 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Karma - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Karma in League of Legends?
Karma wins the Anivia vs Karma matchup with a 56.3% win rate compared to Anivia's 43.8%, a 12.5 percentage point difference. This data is based on 16 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Anivia do against Karma in the early game?
In the early game, Anivia has the advantage against Karma with a 57.1% win rate versus 42.9%. Anivia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Karma in the late game?
In the late game, Karma takes over the Anivia vs Karma matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Karma scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Karma matchup?
Karma wins the matchup against Anivia with a 56.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 12.5 percentage point advantage means Karma is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 16 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Karma?
The best Anivia build against Karma includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Bandlepipes with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Karma?
The best Anivia runes against Karma use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Karma matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Karma?
No, Anivia struggles against Karma with only a 43.8% win rate. Karma has the advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Karma's lead.
How do I play Anivia against Karma?
When playing Anivia against Karma, play cautiously and avoid Karma's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Karma has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.