Cassiopeiavs Fizz
Cassiopeia vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Fizz wins with a 65.2% win rate (+30.4%) over Cassiopeia based on 23 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Fizz Matchup?
Cassiopeia vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 23 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 65.2% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 34.8%, giving Fizz a 30.4 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Fizz
Swiftmarch is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Fizz are Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia40.0%
Fizz60.0%Cassiopeia30.8%Fizz69.2%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 69.2% win rate — 38.5 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Fizz
Precision
Sorcery
The Precision and Sorcery rune setup gives Cassiopeia the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.54% | 61 | 6.3 | 835 | 12,011 | 64.0% | 36.1% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 6.8 | 913 | 12,152 | 52.6% | 51.9% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 6.7 | 894 | 10,720 | 47.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 6.5 | 776 | 11,981 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 6.6 | 858 | 10,851 | 38.1% | 63.6% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.3 | 812 | 10,571 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 7.1 | 968 | 10,348 | 54.5% | 44.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.9 | 771 | 12,569 | 60.0% | 38.1% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 6.7 | 921 | 11,762 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.7 | 843 | 12,319 | 53.3% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.9 | 740 | 11,662 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.1 | 884 | 11,047 | 70.0% | 61.5% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.1 | 787 | 10,814 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.2 | 741 | 10,910 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 6.5 | 811 | 12,229 | 50.0% | 21.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.6 | 669 | 9,969 | 27.3% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 7.0 | 956 | 12,822 | 80.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.7 | 771 | 11,603 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.8 | 724 | 11,518 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.4 | 749 | 10,423 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.4 | 893 | 11,549 | 70.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.8 | 858 | 11,943 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.5 | 925 | 11,500 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.8 | 774 | 10,920 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 82.35% | 17 | 6.7 | 891 | 11,594 | 88.9% | 75.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.0 | 864 | 12,190 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.6 | 882 | 12,072 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 835 | 12,460 | 0.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 815 | 12,128 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.5 | 793 | 9,648 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.6 | 718 | 11,583 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.6 | 888 | 8,746 | 77.8% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 7.0 | 965 | 13,939 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.6 | 944 | 13,076 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 910 | 10,994 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.4 | 1,040 | 12,890 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.6 | 791 | 13,559 | 100.0% | 27.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 746 | 11,841 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 6.2 | 786 | 12,089 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.0 | 850 | 11,825 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.7 | 903 | 13,107 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.4 | 746 | 11,720 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.5 | 960 | 14,270 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 726 | 10,424 | 28.6% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 984 | 14,522 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.3 | 653 | 8,764 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 872 | 11,904 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.3 | 724 | 12,713 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.4 | 1,278 | 12,869 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.4 | 776 | 11,325 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.5 | 887 | 12,685 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.4 | 937 | 14,897 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 802 | 13,090 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 843 | 12,217 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 892 | 12,356 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 7.2 | 924 | 14,448 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.2 | 771 | 11,594 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.8 | 916 | 11,035 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.0 | 860 | 11,651 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.9 | 738 | 8,495 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.5 | 926 | 13,985 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 873 | 13,102 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 635 | 10,697 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 765 | 12,039 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.7 | 653 | 10,177 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.5 | 998 | 12,680 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 675 | 11,352 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.4 | 1,034 | 13,862 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 8.1 | 765 | 11,226 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,365 | 11,712 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 725 | 8,657 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 684 | 10,127 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 1,044 | 10,500 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 879 | 10,244 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 783 | 9,079 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.8 | 896 | 13,847 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 714 | 11,229 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup with a 65.2% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 34.8%, a 30.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 23 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Cassiopeia do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup with a 69.2% win rate compared to 30.8%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 65.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 30.4 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 23 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Fizz?
The best Cassiopeia build against Fizz includes Rod of Ages, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Seraph's Embrace with Swiftmarch. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Fizz?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Fizz use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Fizz?
No, Cassiopeia struggles against Fizz with only a 34.8% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Fizz?
When playing Cassiopeia against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.