Ekkovs Cassiopeia
Ekko vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Cassiopeia wins with a 52.9% win rate (+5.9%) over Ekko based on 17 games. Ekko wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ekko vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Ekko vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 52.9% win rate compared to Ekko's 47.1%, giving Cassiopeia a 5.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ekko controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ekko needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Cassiopeia is slightly favored, Ekko can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Cassiopeia's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Ekko, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, damage and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Cassiopeia
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Cassiopeia are Stormsurge, Zhonya's Hourglass and Dusk and Dawn. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko62.5%
Cassiopeia37.5%Ekko33.3%Cassiopeia66.7%Ekko dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 62.5% win rate — a 25.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Ekko can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Ekko. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Ekko must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Ekko Runes Against Cassiopeia
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Ekko the best tools to compete against Cassiopeia in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 200 | 3.0 | 743 | 12,428 | 47.4% | 52.4% | |
| 46.75% | 169 | 1.2 | 705 | 12,671 | 53.2% | 41.1% | |
| 48.75% | 160 | 1.3 | 717 | 13,317 | 50.0% | 48.0% | |
| 45.75% | 153 | 4.2 | 840 | 12,042 | 42.0% | 48.8% | |
| 52.03% | 148 | 5.8 | 852 | 12,263 | 46.3% | 56.8% | |
| 54.23% | 142 | 1.3 | 747 | 12,790 | 56.8% | 51.5% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 6.3 | 807 | 12,737 | 56.3% | 39.6% | |
| 48.92% | 139 | 6.3 | 798 | 11,315 | 52.2% | 45.8% | |
| 46.97% | 132 | 1.3 | 782 | 13,585 | 40.4% | 52.0% | |
| 43.75% | 128 | 1.2 | 776 | 13,137 | 42.4% | 44.9% | |
| 48.80% | 125 | 3.8 | 763 | 12,099 | 54.5% | 44.3% | |
| 55.20% | 125 | 5.9 | 897 | 12,126 | 65.3% | 48.7% | |
| 55.83% | 120 | 5.0 | 795 | 12,770 | 66.7% | 48.6% | |
| 51.67% | 120 | 1.4 | 736 | 12,773 | 55.6% | 48.5% | |
| 52.54% | 118 | 6.2 | 855 | 12,148 | 46.5% | 58.3% | |
| 43.86% | 114 | 2.9 | 878 | 12,905 | 44.9% | 43.1% | |
| 47.32% | 112 | 6.0 | 944 | 12,553 | 50.9% | 43.4% | |
| 50.91% | 110 | 6.3 | 899 | 12,514 | 50.0% | 51.8% | |
| 47.22% | 108 | 1.4 | 729 | 12,914 | 54.0% | 41.4% | |
| 52.94% | 102 | 1.2 | 727 | 12,528 | 50.0% | 55.4% | |
| 47.00% | 100 | 6.2 | 804 | 12,412 | 50.0% | 44.6% | |
| 43.16% | 95 | 5.9 | 782 | 12,410 | 39.4% | 45.2% | |
| 34.74% | 95 | 1.1 | 695 | 11,819 | 38.6% | 31.4% | |
| 55.17% | 87 | 5.7 | 809 | 10,999 | 52.4% | 57.8% | |
| 52.50% | 80 | 1.3 | 746 | 14,536 | 56.5% | 50.9% | |
| 53.33% | 75 | 5.8 | 825 | 12,179 | 40.7% | 60.4% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 3.4 | 818 | 13,358 | 45.8% | 46.8% | |
| 57.35% | 68 | 6.0 | 827 | 11,997 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 56.06% | 66 | 5.6 | 779 | 11,303 | 58.1% | 54.3% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.1 | 725 | 12,598 | 41.0% | 61.5% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 6.3 | 884 | 11,102 | 54.5% | 53.3% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 1.2 | 695 | 12,850 | 41.7% | 48.7% | |
| 37.70% | 61 | 5.9 | 765 | 11,727 | 33.3% | 40.5% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.1 | 702 | 13,034 | 48.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 60 | 1.1 | 695 | 13,897 | 36.8% | 26.8% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 6.3 | 765 | 11,625 | 53.3% | 44.8% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 5.8 | 782 | 12,236 | 52.6% | 38.5% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 6.4 | 756 | 12,481 | 54.5% | 54.3% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 1.7 | 719 | 13,106 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 1.1 | 742 | 13,828 | 36.4% | 61.8% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 6.1 | 840 | 12,777 | 61.9% | 53.1% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 6.0 | 850 | 11,086 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 6.1 | 906 | 13,027 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 846 | 13,229 | 56.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.1 | 776 | 13,620 | 42.9% | 55.2% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 879 | 12,278 | 56.0% | 56.0% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 718 | 13,300 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 59.18% | 49 | 1.3 | 686 | 13,049 | 51.9% | 68.2% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 3.4 | 728 | 11,129 | 56.5% | 38.5% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 4.3 | 818 | 10,563 | 63.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 6.4 | 902 | 12,673 | 31.8% | 61.5% | |
| 60.00% | 45 | 6.5 | 847 | 12,435 | 61.9% | 58.3% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.5 | 910 | 13,150 | 41.2% | 52.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.3 | 756 | 10,922 | 47.1% | 63.6% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 1.2 | 712 | 13,151 | 43.8% | 30.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.2 | 759 | 12,600 | 50.0% | 63.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.5 | 780 | 13,185 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 1.3 | 774 | 12,811 | 38.9% | 52.4% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 1.1 | 639 | 12,086 | 63.2% | 31.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,662 | 70.6% | 45.0% | |
| 69.44% | 36 | 6.0 | 815 | 11,109 | 70.0% | 68.8% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 6.0 | 746 | 12,184 | 81.8% | 40.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 6.4 | 1,006 | 12,088 | 55.6% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.2 | 731 | 12,852 | 53.3% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 5.3 | 890 | 13,217 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 5.8 | 834 | 11,036 | 42.1% | 53.3% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 1.0 | 839 | 13,684 | 28.6% | 68.4% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 2.0 | 802 | 13,428 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 1.1 | 680 | 11,299 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 3.9 | 743 | 12,516 | 38.5% | 36.8% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 5.9 | 778 | 12,621 | 60.0% | 76.2% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 4.3 | 675 | 12,146 | 36.4% | 42.1% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.1 | 833 | 12,895 | 53.9% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 5.7 | 776 | 12,120 | 44.4% | 42.1% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.8 | 749 | 12,820 | 81.8% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 4.0 | 775 | 10,906 | 46.7% | 45.5% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 3.5 | 707 | 11,504 | 30.8% | 30.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 742 | 13,069 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.2 | 867 | 10,671 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 4.4 | 945 | 12,415 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.1 | 743 | 13,854 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.7 | 855 | 12,231 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 688 | 11,919 | 54.5% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 824 | 11,248 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 6.4 | 890 | 12,040 | 0.0% | 36.4% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.1 | 907 | 11,805 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 4.9 | 935 | 11,511 | 77.8% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 726 | 12,047 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 2.9 | 818 | 11,678 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 4.6 | 763 | 12,524 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.7 | 840 | 14,133 | 0.0% | 46.1% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 834 | 11,995 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.9 | 659 | 12,079 | 55.6% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.8 | 879 | 13,395 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.5 | 796 | 12,769 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,030 | 11,979 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.6 | 647 | 10,887 | 33.3% | 87.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 780 | 14,789 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.4 | 773 | 10,294 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.0 | 871 | 12,041 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.0 | 858 | 13,759 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.1 | 733 | 13,666 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 931 | 14,229 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 738 | 14,131 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 3.2 | 908 | 14,094 | 0.0% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 845 | 14,309 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.1 | 700 | 10,947 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 838 | 13,882 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 941 | 13,815 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.9 | 754 | 11,374 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 705 | 10,587 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.9 | 1,005 | 12,434 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 873 | 13,530 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.1 | 499 | 9,352 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.7 | 1,007 | 10,947 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 794 | 11,360 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 760 | 11,197 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 652 | 12,198 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.7 | 658 | 12,753 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,186 | 16,600 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 784 | 12,145 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 921 | 17,409 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.5 | 684 | 11,148 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 746 | 13,206 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.8 | 901 | 13,329 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 628 | 8,065 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 608 | 10,319 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 693 | 12,050 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 1,114 | 12,369 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 735 | 11,280 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 723 | 11,429 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 648 | 11,569 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 854 | 15,532 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 52.9% win rate compared to Ekko's 47.1%, a 5.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Ekko do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Ekko has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 62.5% win rate versus 37.5%. Ekko players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Ekko with a 52.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 5.9 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Cassiopeia?
The best Ekko build against Cassiopeia includes Stormsurge, Zhonya's Hourglass, Dusk and Dawn with Spellslinger's Shoes. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Ekko runes against Cassiopeia use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 40.0% win rate in the Ekko vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Cassiopeia?
No, Ekko struggles against Cassiopeia with only a 47.1% win rate. Cassiopeia has the advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Cassiopeia's lead.
How do I play Ekko against Cassiopeia?
When playing Ekko against Cassiopeia, play cautiously and avoid Cassiopeia's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Cassiopeia has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.