Ekkovs Hecarim
Ekko vs Hecarim is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Hecarim wins with a 54.5% win rate (+9.1%) over Ekko based on 79 games. Hecarim holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Hecarim(45.5%)Who Wins the Ekko vs Hecarim Matchup?
Ekko vs Hecarim Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Hecarim matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 79 recent matches analyzed, Hecarim wins with a 54.5% win rate compared to Ekko's 45.5%, giving Hecarim a 9.1 percentage point advantage. Hecarim dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ekko players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Hecarim leads by 572 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Hecarim has a strong advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Hecarim overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Hecarim Laning Phase Breakdown
Hecarim is favored during the laning phase against Ekko, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Hecarim holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Hecarim
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Hecarim, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Hecarim are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Void Staff. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 80.0% win rate across 5 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Hecarim. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko43.9%Hecarim56.1%Ekko47.2%Hecarim52.8%Hecarim dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 56.1% win rate — a 12.2 percentage point lead over Ekko. This lopsided early game means Hecarim can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Hecarim is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 52.8% win rate — 5.6 points above Ekko. Extended games heavily favor Hecarim, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Hecarim holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ekko players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Ekko Runes Against Hecarim
Domination
Inspiration
The Domination and Inspiration rune setup gives Ekko the best tools to compete against Hecarim in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.66% | 303 | 1.2 | 721 | 13,308 | 49.6% | 51.4% | |
| 53.33% | 285 | 6.5 | 814 | 12,437 | 52.0% | 54.4% | |
| 52.89% | 243 | 6.3 | 848 | 12,551 | 50.4% | 55.0% | |
| 50.98% | 205 | 1.3 | 726 | 13,480 | 52.1% | 50.0% | |
| 49.74% | 199 | 1.3 | 776 | 14,215 | 48.0% | 50.8% | |
| 43.55% | 189 | 1.4 | 734 | 13,167 | 47.8% | 39.4% | |
| 46.77% | 186 | 6.3 | 849 | 12,598 | 50.0% | 44.2% | |
| 42.70% | 186 | 1.2 | 687 | 12,853 | 37.9% | 46.9% | |
| 54.24% | 178 | 1.1 | 738 | 13,346 | 55.3% | 53.5% | |
| 57.95% | 177 | 6.2 | 923 | 12,124 | 55.0% | 61.8% | |
| 48.28% | 177 | 3.3 | 747 | 12,641 | 50.5% | 45.8% | |
| 56.32% | 174 | 6.5 | 814 | 13,144 | 56.8% | 56.0% | |
| 47.06% | 170 | 4.1 | 858 | 12,841 | 43.4% | 50.0% | |
| 40.85% | 166 | 4.5 | 769 | 12,667 | 40.3% | 41.4% | |
| 49.68% | 157 | 1.1 | 693 | 12,700 | 54.3% | 46.0% | |
| 55.41% | 150 | 5.6 | 850 | 12,952 | 53.2% | 57.0% | |
| 52.14% | 140 | 3.6 | 797 | 13,022 | 52.5% | 51.9% | |
| 52.55% | 138 | 6.4 | 814 | 13,026 | 53.9% | 51.8% | |
| 45.11% | 134 | 5.9 | 852 | 12,407 | 44.4% | 45.6% | |
| 48.85% | 132 | 1.4 | 821 | 13,522 | 50.0% | 47.9% | |
| 46.72% | 126 | 1.2 | 707 | 13,530 | 42.9% | 49.3% | |
| 61.11% | 126 | 6.1 | 881 | 13,367 | 75.5% | 52.0% | |
| 48.39% | 125 | 1.2 | 782 | 13,600 | 61.0% | 36.9% | |
| 45.60% | 125 | 1.4 | 882 | 12,934 | 40.0% | 50.8% | |
| 59.02% | 123 | 6.4 | 927 | 12,840 | 59.3% | 58.7% | |
| 46.22% | 120 | 1.1 | 726 | 12,602 | 50.9% | 41.9% | |
| 60.50% | 119 | 1.3 | 728 | 12,486 | 61.3% | 59.6% | |
| 60.71% | 113 | 6.3 | 788 | 12,529 | 59.6% | 61.7% | |
| 58.41% | 113 | 1.3 | 734 | 13,319 | 54.2% | 61.5% | |
| 40.18% | 113 | 6.0 | 783 | 12,415 | 42.5% | 38.5% | |
| 55.86% | 112 | 1.4 | 853 | 13,790 | 71.7% | 41.4% | |
| 50.45% | 112 | 1.2 | 739 | 13,111 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 47.57% | 104 | 6.3 | 826 | 12,411 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 53.00% | 100 | 3.0 | 773 | 13,670 | 43.6% | 59.0% | |
| 47.00% | 100 | 1.4 | 721 | 13,610 | 36.1% | 53.1% | |
| 43.75% | 96 | 1.2 | 744 | 13,940 | 53.5% | 35.9% | |
| 44.09% | 94 | 6.3 | 770 | 12,506 | 53.3% | 35.4% | |
| 47.31% | 93 | 6.5 | 810 | 12,657 | 42.5% | 50.9% | |
| 39.13% | 93 | 4.3 | 810 | 12,611 | 36.6% | 41.2% | |
| 51.09% | 92 | 6.7 | 813 | 13,323 | 51.4% | 50.9% | |
| 54.44% | 90 | 6.3 | 812 | 12,690 | 47.8% | 61.4% | |
| 51.69% | 89 | 6.2 | 762 | 12,289 | 57.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 1.0 | 752 | 13,056 | 43.6% | 52.1% | |
| 48.84% | 86 | 1.6 | 777 | 13,759 | 64.7% | 38.5% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 1.3 | 706 | 12,742 | 51.4% | 44.9% | |
| 61.45% | 84 | 2.1 | 729 | 13,380 | 61.1% | 61.7% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 1.4 | 772 | 13,045 | 48.8% | 62.5% | |
| 56.96% | 79 | 6.5 | 791 | 12,219 | 64.1% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 79 | 1.1 | 779 | 12,976 | 43.9% | 47.2% | |
| 46.15% | 78 | 1.3 | 819 | 13,960 | 54.3% | 39.5% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 1.1 | 709 | 12,972 | 60.5% | 42.9% | |
| 43.66% | 71 | 1.2 | 697 | 13,130 | 51.4% | 36.1% | |
| 45.07% | 71 | 2.7 | 784 | 13,126 | 45.5% | 44.7% | |
| 54.41% | 69 | 6.2 | 887 | 13,130 | 64.0% | 48.8% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 1.4 | 830 | 12,741 | 55.3% | 37.9% | |
| 53.23% | 62 | 6.6 | 893 | 13,490 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 50.82% | 62 | 1.2 | 751 | 13,117 | 59.3% | 44.1% | |
| 53.33% | 61 | 6.7 | 944 | 12,921 | 67.9% | 40.6% | |
| 59.32% | 59 | 4.7 | 772 | 13,106 | 61.5% | 57.6% | |
| 49.12% | 58 | 3.7 | 774 | 13,672 | 60.9% | 41.2% | |
| 49.12% | 58 | 6.3 | 814 | 12,445 | 57.7% | 41.9% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 1.4 | 747 | 13,000 | 53.3% | 44.4% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 1.4 | 773 | 14,505 | 68.2% | 45.7% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 4.6 | 827 | 13,273 | 42.3% | 50.0% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 5.8 | 776 | 10,826 | 58.6% | 38.5% | |
| 57.41% | 54 | 6.7 | 948 | 11,978 | 60.0% | 54.2% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 6.4 | 848 | 12,027 | 54.5% | 32.3% | |
| 45.28% | 53 | 2.1 | 758 | 13,500 | 35.0% | 51.5% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 6.5 | 919 | 12,855 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 1.4 | 700 | 11,751 | 39.3% | 52.4% | |
| 65.31% | 49 | 6.8 | 874 | 12,720 | 67.9% | 61.9% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 1.3 | 743 | 14,423 | 52.9% | 56.7% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 4.3 | 1,012 | 13,993 | 57.9% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 45 | 1.1 | 815 | 13,737 | 52.0% | 57.9% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 3.0 | 842 | 12,336 | 44.4% | 44.4% | |
| 54.55% | 45 | 6.5 | 794 | 13,440 | 71.4% | 46.7% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.1 | 876 | 12,945 | 52.6% | 56.0% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 1.1 | 717 | 12,018 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.10% | 42 | 2.3 | 788 | 13,587 | 55.6% | 56.5% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 1.4 | 732 | 11,680 | 56.5% | 52.6% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 2.7 | 701 | 13,639 | 71.4% | 42.3% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 2.0 | 801 | 13,246 | 52.6% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 1.7 | 805 | 13,139 | 57.9% | 61.9% | |
| 45.71% | 36 | 4.3 | 678 | 11,845 | 50.0% | 42.1% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 1.3 | 654 | 12,471 | 61.5% | 39.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.9 | 792 | 13,960 | 52.6% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 35 | 6.2 | 784 | 11,909 | 73.7% | 43.8% | |
| 61.76% | 35 | 6.3 | 771 | 11,639 | 61.9% | 61.5% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 3.1 | 823 | 13,244 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.7 | 876 | 15,102 | 55.6% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.3 | 750 | 12,650 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.0 | 837 | 12,295 | 69.2% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 2.5 | 752 | 13,604 | 33.3% | 68.4% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 1.8 | 728 | 11,655 | 41.2% | 40.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 5.8 | 800 | 13,039 | 22.2% | 58.8% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 5.6 | 984 | 13,302 | 54.5% | 58.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.1 | 786 | 11,832 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 4.9 | 731 | 12,257 | 77.8% | 54.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 4.3 | 669 | 11,874 | 12.5% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.7 | 722 | 11,231 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 5.7 | 826 | 11,894 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.5 | 768 | 12,942 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.3 | 914 | 13,108 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.5 | 956 | 13,920 | 55.6% | 75.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 803 | 11,647 | 37.5% | 25.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.0 | 777 | 11,893 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.0 | 574 | 11,263 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 725 | 12,710 | 70.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.5 | 826 | 11,064 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 753 | 10,950 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.3 | 807 | 13,175 | 25.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.6 | 779 | 14,427 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.4 | 904 | 12,265 | 20.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.4 | 766 | 13,929 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.6 | 834 | 13,135 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.4 | 743 | 9,836 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 4.6 | 912 | 12,079 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.2 | 776 | 13,406 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 823 | 12,006 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 780 | 13,423 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.0 | 703 | 13,374 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 646 | 8,645 | 28.6% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.5 | 772 | 14,937 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.9 | 816 | 12,529 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.9 | 752 | 11,712 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 916 | 13,786 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 1,029 | 15,141 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 870 | 14,293 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.4 | 694 | 11,082 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 702 | 8,626 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.5 | 869 | 11,027 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 636 | 11,786 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 865 | 12,857 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 686 | 11,290 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 669 | 11,260 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 707 | 14,127 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 787 | 10,608 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 824 | 13,100 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 918 | 15,159 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 772 | 10,652 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 807 | 13,067 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Hecarim - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Hecarim in League of Legends?
Hecarim wins the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to Ekko's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 79 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Ekko do against Hecarim in the early game?
In the early game, Hecarim has the advantage against Ekko with a 56.1% win rate versus 43.9%. Hecarim players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Hecarim in the late game?
In the late game, Hecarim takes over the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup with a 52.8% win rate compared to 47.2%. Hecarim scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup?
Hecarim wins the matchup against Ekko with a 54.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 9.1 percentage point advantage means Hecarim is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 79 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Hecarim?
The best Ekko build against Hecarim includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 80.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Hecarim?
The best Ekko runes against Hecarim use the Domination primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.9% win rate in the Ekko vs Hecarim matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Hecarim?
No, Ekko struggles against Hecarim with only a 45.5% win rate. Hecarim has the advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Hecarim's lead.
How do I play Ekko against Hecarim?
When playing Ekko against Hecarim, play cautiously and avoid Hecarim's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Hecarim has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.