
Fizzvs Teemo
Fizz vs Teemo is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Teemo wins with a 52.8% win rate (+5.6%) over Fizz based on 36 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Teemo scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Teemo matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Teemo Matchup?

Fizz vs Teemo Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Teemo matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 36 recent matches analyzed, Teemo wins with a 52.8% win rate compared to Fizz's 47.2%, giving Teemo a 5.6 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Teemo outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Teemo reaches their power spikes, while Teemo should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Teemo leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Teemo is slightly favored, Fizz can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Teemo's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Teemo Laning Phase Breakdown
Teemo is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Teemo holds advantages in farming, damage and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Teemo
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Teemo, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Teemo are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 20.0% win rate across 5 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Fizz the best chance to compete against Teemo. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Teemo matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.6% win rate — a 27.3 percentage point lead over Teemo. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Teemo is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Teemo, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Teemo reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Teemo survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Teemo
The Inspiration and Domination rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Teemo in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.61% | 328 | 6.1 | 829 | 12,622 | 49.0% | 51.9% | |
| 50.54% | 279 | 6.0 | 826 | 12,184 | 46.8% | 54.4% | |
| 49.11% | 224 | 6.2 | 850 | 12,917 | 55.7% | 44.1% | |
| 54.95% | 202 | 6.4 | 810 | 12,995 | 51.7% | 57.5% | |
| 58.48% | 171 | 5.9 | 912 | 12,534 | 57.7% | 59.1% | |
| 51.83% | 166 | 5.6 | 795 | 12,319 | 52.9% | 51.1% | |
| 45.68% | 163 | 5.7 | 784 | 13,004 | 48.7% | 43.0% | |
| 52.87% | 157 | 4.5 | 756 | 12,173 | 45.1% | 59.3% | |
| 58.50% | 149 | 4.5 | 854 | 13,081 | 59.7% | 57.5% | |
| 57.64% | 144 | 6.0 | 859 | 13,167 | 54.4% | 60.5% | |
| 58.27% | 128 | 6.0 | 807 | 13,044 | 50.0% | 64.4% | |
| 53.54% | 127 | 5.8 | 860 | 12,796 | 49.2% | 57.6% | |
| 53.54% | 127 | 5.8 | 756 | 12,707 | 59.6% | 50.0% | |
| 60.33% | 121 | 6.5 | 814 | 13,231 | 66.1% | 55.4% | |
| 52.99% | 118 | 6.1 | 746 | 12,103 | 57.9% | 48.3% | |
| 42.48% | 114 | 1.3 | 709 | 13,088 | 38.5% | 45.9% | |
| 50.00% | 110 | 4.8 | 840 | 12,455 | 56.6% | 43.9% | |
| 49.54% | 109 | 6.1 | 719 | 11,661 | 50.9% | 48.1% | |
| 55.56% | 109 | 4.3 | 818 | 13,680 | 54.0% | 56.9% | |
| 58.65% | 104 | 5.9 | 828 | 12,533 | 56.8% | 60.0% | |
| 54.00% | 100 | 6.4 | 932 | 13,140 | 67.5% | 45.0% | |
| 49.46% | 93 | 6.2 | 828 | 12,762 | 50.0% | 49.1% | |
| 41.18% | 86 | 1.5 | 718 | 13,444 | 36.4% | 44.2% | |
| 49.41% | 85 | 6.6 | 866 | 13,179 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 6.1 | 753 | 12,275 | 51.1% | 45.0% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 6.1 | 854 | 12,204 | 60.5% | 57.5% | |
| 35.90% | 78 | 1.0 | 660 | 12,846 | 31.4% | 39.5% | |
| 50.00% | 78 | 6.0 | 797 | 12,105 | 56.4% | 43.6% | |
| 50.00% | 77 | 1.3 | 672 | 12,871 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 76 | 5.2 | 852 | 12,768 | 51.4% | 44.7% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 6.2 | 778 | 12,223 | 50.0% | 51.3% | |
| 47.95% | 73 | 6.4 | 843 | 12,339 | 41.2% | 53.9% | |
| 47.22% | 72 | 5.8 | 791 | 12,256 | 42.1% | 52.9% | |
| 52.78% | 72 | 1.6 | 793 | 14,037 | 52.9% | 52.6% | |
| 57.58% | 67 | 1.1 | 778 | 13,969 | 60.0% | 56.1% | |
| 45.45% | 66 | 5.7 | 756 | 12,337 | 47.6% | 44.4% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 6.3 | 892 | 12,036 | 44.4% | 55.3% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.8 | 802 | 13,006 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 1.6 | 757 | 12,915 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 58.62% | 60 | 3.6 | 767 | 12,214 | 61.3% | 55.6% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 6.2 | 885 | 12,366 | 65.4% | 51.5% | |
| 42.86% | 57 | 5.9 | 866 | 12,563 | 44.8% | 40.7% | |
| 53.57% | 56 | 4.2 | 791 | 12,383 | 65.5% | 40.7% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.2 | 813 | 13,336 | 47.8% | 51.7% | |
| 50.00% | 51 | 5.8 | 838 | 13,072 | 56.3% | 47.1% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 5.5 | 849 | 13,744 | 61.9% | 35.7% | |
| 56.52% | 47 | 1.0 | 724 | 13,372 | 35.0% | 73.1% | |
| 57.78% | 46 | 6.4 | 784 | 12,142 | 70.0% | 48.0% | |
| 48.84% | 44 | 1.1 | 850 | 13,338 | 56.3% | 44.4% | |
| 30.23% | 44 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,313 | 31.8% | 28.6% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 1.4 | 844 | 13,938 | 38.1% | 39.1% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 1.1 | 731 | 12,752 | 55.0% | 41.7% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 2.0 | 806 | 13,914 | 40.9% | 61.9% | |
| 35.71% | 43 | 1.2 | 731 | 13,642 | 42.9% | 32.1% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.8 | 652 | 12,035 | 36.8% | 43.5% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 826 | 13,821 | 46.7% | 63.0% | |
| 50.00% | 41 | 6.0 | 879 | 13,540 | 61.1% | 40.9% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 5.3 | 853 | 13,372 | 58.8% | 34.8% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 1.3 | 731 | 12,108 | 44.0% | 38.5% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 1.0 | 779 | 15,158 | 75.0% | 56.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 5.9 | 848 | 12,709 | 50.0% | 56.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 1.4 | 793 | 13,730 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 2.9 | 816 | 14,467 | 63.6% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.6 | 769 | 13,270 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 4.5 | 808 | 12,628 | 62.5% | 47.4% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.2 | 827 | 11,927 | 66.7% | 38.5% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 2.7 | 765 | 13,795 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 5.8 | 767 | 11,636 | 68.8% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 3.9 | 704 | 13,299 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.7 | 954 | 13,809 | 50.0% | 55.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.1 | 704 | 12,725 | 58.3% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 4.4 | 749 | 12,972 | 61.5% | 35.3% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 4.1 | 826 | 11,676 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 64.29% | 29 | 5.1 | 771 | 12,785 | 58.3% | 68.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.9 | 894 | 13,642 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.6 | 781 | 14,385 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.7 | 768 | 12,427 | 90.9% | 53.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.1 | 776 | 13,045 | 53.9% | 30.8% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.0 | 818 | 13,468 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 5.7 | 783 | 11,261 | 40.0% | 53.3% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 802 | 12,962 | 38.5% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 816 | 14,253 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 23 | 2.2 | 788 | 13,192 | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 1.5 | 806 | 13,703 | 55.6% | 71.4% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.2 | 697 | 14,058 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.1 | 796 | 16,057 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 2.1 | 713 | 12,757 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.5 | 813 | 13,495 | 55.6% | 46.1% | |
| 61.11% | 19 | 4.5 | 703 | 11,246 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 44.44% | 19 | 0.9 | 631 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 0.9 | 790 | 11,797 | 53.3% | 75.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 2.7 | 790 | 13,243 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 1.7 | 778 | 13,193 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 1.1 | 824 | 13,178 | 55.6% | 77.8% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.2 | 785 | 13,730 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 41.18% | 18 | 1.6 | 603 | 12,948 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.2 | 792 | 14,342 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.8 | 786 | 12,156 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.3 | 876 | 11,808 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.5 | 757 | 13,351 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.4 | 793 | 11,852 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 942 | 13,370 | 87.5% | 42.9% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.9 | 963 | 11,828 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 15 | 5.6 | 866 | 13,710 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.1 | 878 | 13,314 | 57.1% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 0.9 | 773 | 12,183 | 85.7% | 42.9% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 3.1 | 763 | 13,252 | 83.3% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.6 | 716 | 12,874 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.4 | 722 | 12,003 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 717 | 12,662 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 782 | 14,479 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.0 | 795 | 11,615 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 11 | 5.7 | 909 | 11,504 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 734 | 10,226 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 843 | 13,483 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 989 | 11,560 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 781 | 12,828 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 826 | 12,839 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 744 | 13,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.1 | 821 | 12,920 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 850 | 13,380 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 654 | 11,213 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 755 | 15,214 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 844 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.5 | 719 | 13,534 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 7 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,576 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.6 | 902 | 14,054 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,700 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 639 | 11,309 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 703 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 653 | 10,348 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 999 | 14,053 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,069 | 14,765 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.4 | 1,026 | 13,675 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,996 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,690 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 879 | 14,052 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Teemo - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Teemo in League of Legends?
Teemo wins the Fizz vs Teemo matchup with a 52.8% win rate compared to Fizz's 47.2%, a 5.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 36 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fizz do against Teemo in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Teemo with a 63.6% win rate versus 36.4%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Teemo in the late game?
In the late game, Teemo takes over the Fizz vs Teemo matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Teemo scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Teemo matchup?
Teemo wins the matchup against Fizz with a 52.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 5.6 percentage point advantage means Teemo is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 36 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Teemo?
The best Fizz build against Teemo includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 20.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Teemo?
The best Fizz runes against Teemo use the Inspiration primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Teemo matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Teemo?
No, Fizz struggles against Teemo with only a 47.2% win rate. Teemo has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Teemo's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Teemo?
When playing Fizz against Teemo, play cautiously and avoid Teemo's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Teemo has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.