Karmavs Fizz
Karma vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Karma wins with a 75.0% win rate (+50.0%) over Fizz based on 8 games. Karma holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Karma build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Karma vs Fizz matchup.
Karma Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Karma performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(75.0%)Who Wins the Karma vs Fizz Matchup?
Karma vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Karma vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 8 recent matches analyzed, Karma wins with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, giving Karma a 50.0 percentage point advantage. Karma dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fizz players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Karma leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Karma players can confidently pick into Fizz and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Fizz away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Karma vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Karma is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Karma holds advantages in damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Karma Build Against Fizz
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Karma needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Karma against Fizz are Dawncore, Echoes of Helia and Moonstone Renewer. This combination gives Karma an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Karma vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Karma100.0%Fizz0.0%Karma66.7%Fizz33.3%Karma dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Karma can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Karma is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Karma, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Karma holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fizz players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Karma Runes Against Fizz
Sorcery
Inspiration
Running Sorcery primary with Inspiration secondary allows Karma to press their advantage against Fizz, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Karma matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Karma's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Karma build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.39% | 533 | 1.2 | 378 | 8,468 | 45.0% | 45.8% | |
| 49.20% | 314 | 1.2 | 380 | 8,848 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.40% | 289 | 1.4 | 388 | 9,286 | 39.6% | 51.9% | |
| 44.44% | 289 | 1.2 | 368 | 8,259 | 47.2% | 41.1% | |
| 47.46% | 276 | 1.2 | 401 | 8,452 | 45.5% | 49.6% | |
| 50.24% | 212 | 1.3 | 385 | 8,996 | 40.5% | 57.4% | |
| 51.72% | 204 | 1.2 | 368 | 8,463 | 60.2% | 42.1% | |
| 48.51% | 203 | 1.2 | 416 | 8,908 | 46.3% | 50.5% | |
| 46.15% | 196 | 1.2 | 364 | 8,561 | 49.0% | 43.4% | |
| 53.13% | 192 | 1.2 | 414 | 8,948 | 54.0% | 52.4% | |
| 50.26% | 189 | 1.2 | 415 | 8,290 | 45.8% | 54.8% | |
| 45.41% | 186 | 1.3 | 401 | 8,713 | 42.3% | 47.7% | |
| 51.38% | 181 | 1.2 | 402 | 8,885 | 54.5% | 48.4% | |
| 51.74% | 174 | 1.1 | 400 | 9,233 | 60.5% | 44.8% | |
| 49.67% | 152 | 1.2 | 377 | 9,010 | 50.0% | 49.4% | |
| 48.06% | 130 | 1.3 | 425 | 9,386 | 51.0% | 46.3% | |
| 50.79% | 128 | 1.2 | 371 | 9,109 | 46.3% | 54.2% | |
| 51.61% | 124 | 1.2 | 343 | 9,052 | 44.6% | 57.4% | |
| 46.72% | 122 | 1.3 | 385 | 9,224 | 45.6% | 47.4% | |
| 55.96% | 110 | 1.3 | 333 | 8,314 | 61.9% | 47.8% | |
| 51.82% | 110 | 1.3 | 396 | 8,716 | 46.4% | 57.4% | |
| 59.81% | 107 | 1.5 | 476 | 9,068 | 53.2% | 65.0% | |
| 50.96% | 105 | 1.2 | 383 | 8,394 | 51.8% | 50.0% | |
| 46.46% | 99 | 1.1 | 424 | 8,504 | 46.8% | 46.1% | |
| 42.86% | 91 | 1.2 | 387 | 8,806 | 46.0% | 40.7% | |
| 46.07% | 90 | 1.7 | 413 | 9,069 | 31.3% | 54.4% | |
| 45.45% | 88 | 1.2 | 466 | 8,171 | 42.9% | 48.7% | |
| 52.38% | 84 | 1.3 | 421 | 9,758 | 50.0% | 53.7% | |
| 47.50% | 81 | 1.2 | 345 | 8,104 | 53.3% | 40.0% | |
| 55.38% | 65 | 1.3 | 378 | 9,125 | 60.7% | 51.4% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.2 | 370 | 8,676 | 58.1% | 51.6% | |
| 62.26% | 53 | 1.6 | 421 | 9,174 | 58.3% | 65.5% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 1.2 | 391 | 8,703 | 60.0% | 34.8% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 1.8 | 421 | 8,770 | 58.8% | 30.0% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 1.2 | 377 | 8,144 | 41.2% | 35.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 2.2 | 419 | 9,671 | 64.3% | 55.6% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.9 | 492 | 9,177 | 91.7% | 42.1% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.0 | 400 | 8,936 | 53.9% | 37.5% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 1.2 | 349 | 8,616 | 60.0% | 53.9% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.2 | 435 | 9,030 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 5.9 | 787 | 9,166 | 58.8% | 77.8% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 2.1 | 444 | 9,063 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 1.2 | 364 | 8,034 | 64.3% | 70.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.2 | 407 | 10,216 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 1.6 | 477 | 9,124 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.1 | 648 | 10,153 | 61.5% | 14.3% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 3.0 | 420 | 7,741 | 41.7% | 25.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 501 | 9,839 | 33.3% | 72.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 3.9 | 634 | 10,847 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 47.06% | 18 | 3.4 | 658 | 9,268 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.3 | 424 | 8,714 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.1 | 519 | 9,318 | 71.4% | 37.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.0 | 395 | 8,973 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 3.0 | 474 | 9,033 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.3 | 766 | 11,658 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.8 | 876 | 10,610 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 2.2 | 478 | 9,287 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.3 | 751 | 11,665 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 11 | 4.0 | 465 | 9,745 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 548 | 9,601 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 587 | 10,282 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 441 | 9,696 | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 927 | 11,935 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.5 | 470 | 9,701 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 713 | 11,604 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.0 | 467 | 8,383 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.5 | 458 | 9,028 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.9 | 408 | 10,458 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.3 | 638 | 9,940 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.3 | 451 | 7,794 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 686 | 5,398 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 8 | 1.8 | 480 | 9,084 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 467 | 7,065 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 809 | 10,709 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 652 | 9,737 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 736 | 12,274 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 551 | 8,212 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 750 | 10,276 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 2.1 | 460 | 9,964 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 324 | 8,841 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.4 | 496 | 8,794 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.0 | 579 | 11,935 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 7.3 | 651 | 10,928 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.2 | 291 | 6,014 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.5 | 385 | 7,600 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 551 | 9,380 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.9 | 616 | 9,598 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.6 | 869 | 9,030 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.4 | 621 | 9,319 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.9 | 415 | 9,403 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.2 | 551 | 9,696 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 479 | 10,566 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 867 | 9,956 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 635 | 9,913 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.3 | 755 | 10,650 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 643 | 10,189 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 678 | 11,843 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 913 | 10,583 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 344 | 9,178 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 779 | 10,589 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 437 | 11,225 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 965 | 10,002 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 949 | 9,313 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 698 | 9,681 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 754 | 9,270 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Karma vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Karma do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Karma wins the Karma vs Fizz matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 8 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Karma do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Karma has the advantage against Fizz with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Karma players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Karma do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Karma takes over the Karma vs Fizz matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Karma scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Karma vs Fizz matchup?
Karma wins the matchup against Fizz with a 75.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 50.0 percentage point advantage means Karma is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 8 games analyzed.
What is the best Karma build against Fizz?
The best Karma build against Fizz includes Dawncore, Echoes of Helia, Moonstone Renewer with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Karma runes against Fizz?
The best Karma runes against Fizz use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Karma vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Karma counter Fizz?
Yes, Karma has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 75.0% win rate. Karma strongly counters Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.4 data.
How do I play Karma against Fizz?
When playing Karma against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.