Fizzvs Karma
Fizz vs Karma is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Karma wins with a 75.0% win rate (+50.0%) over Fizz based on 8 games. Karma holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Karma matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Karma(25.0%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Karma Matchup?
Fizz vs Karma Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Karma matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 8 recent matches analyzed, Karma wins with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, giving Karma a 50.0 percentage point advantage. Karma dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fizz players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Karma leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Karma has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Karma overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Karma Laning Phase Breakdown
Karma is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Karma holds advantages in damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Karma
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Karma, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Karma are Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Karma matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz0.0%Karma100.0%Fizz33.3%Karma66.7%Karma dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Karma can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Karma is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Karma, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Karma holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fizz players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fizz Runes Against Karma
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Karma in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.24% | 369 | 6.1 | 819 | 12,543 | 45.2% | 50.8% | |
| 51.40% | 321 | 6.0 | 819 | 12,019 | 48.2% | 55.0% | |
| 47.33% | 243 | 6.2 | 844 | 12,846 | 54.8% | 41.7% | |
| 54.30% | 221 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,949 | 53.2% | 55.1% | |
| 55.90% | 195 | 5.9 | 906 | 12,621 | 55.2% | 56.5% | |
| 46.45% | 184 | 5.7 | 779 | 12,951 | 48.2% | 45.0% | |
| 51.65% | 184 | 5.5 | 790 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 52.35% | 171 | 4.5 | 747 | 12,163 | 45.5% | 58.1% | |
| 59.15% | 166 | 4.3 | 842 | 13,063 | 59.7% | 58.6% | |
| 56.52% | 161 | 6.0 | 866 | 13,291 | 55.6% | 57.3% | |
| 58.22% | 147 | 6.0 | 802 | 13,083 | 53.2% | 61.9% | |
| 55.32% | 141 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,958 | 50.0% | 59.5% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 5.8 | 750 | 12,622 | 58.2% | 48.8% | |
| 59.12% | 137 | 6.5 | 813 | 13,196 | 62.5% | 56.2% | |
| 52.59% | 136 | 6.1 | 759 | 12,033 | 57.6% | 47.8% | |
| 49.22% | 128 | 4.9 | 857 | 12,598 | 56.7% | 42.6% | |
| 54.40% | 127 | 4.3 | 803 | 13,532 | 55.7% | 53.1% | |
| 51.22% | 123 | 6.1 | 724 | 11,714 | 53.2% | 49.2% | |
| 41.67% | 121 | 1.3 | 705 | 13,048 | 37.5% | 45.3% | |
| 55.83% | 120 | 5.8 | 825 | 12,337 | 52.0% | 58.6% | |
| 55.08% | 118 | 6.3 | 941 | 13,041 | 70.2% | 45.1% | |
| 50.00% | 102 | 6.1 | 842 | 12,756 | 53.3% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 96 | 6.6 | 863 | 13,180 | 59.1% | 42.3% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 6.1 | 767 | 12,478 | 54.2% | 48.9% | |
| 42.39% | 93 | 1.5 | 720 | 13,466 | 41.7% | 42.9% | |
| 49.44% | 92 | 1.4 | 687 | 12,961 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 56.04% | 91 | 6.1 | 850 | 12,289 | 60.9% | 51.1% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 6.2 | 767 | 11,890 | 48.8% | 44.7% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 6.0 | 798 | 12,261 | 58.5% | 41.3% | |
| 38.37% | 86 | 1.0 | 667 | 13,001 | 33.3% | 42.0% | |
| 49.40% | 83 | 5.9 | 788 | 12,329 | 41.5% | 57.1% | |
| 49.37% | 80 | 5.2 | 862 | 12,847 | 53.9% | 45.0% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,325 | 38.9% | 53.5% | |
| 52.56% | 79 | 1.1 | 771 | 14,010 | 54.8% | 51.1% | |
| 51.28% | 78 | 1.6 | 790 | 13,999 | 54.0% | 48.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 1.7 | 764 | 13,083 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 5.7 | 754 | 12,164 | 50.0% | 45.3% | |
| 56.58% | 76 | 6.3 | 896 | 12,062 | 52.9% | 59.5% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 1.8 | 800 | 12,918 | 44.8% | 47.5% | |
| 59.02% | 63 | 3.7 | 775 | 12,343 | 62.5% | 55.2% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 6.1 | 889 | 12,483 | 65.4% | 48.6% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 4.4 | 809 | 12,648 | 66.7% | 38.7% | |
| 42.37% | 60 | 5.9 | 857 | 12,491 | 41.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.85% | 60 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,775 | 55.0% | 48.7% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 1.3 | 800 | 13,204 | 51.9% | 53.1% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 1.1 | 718 | 12,912 | 47.8% | 46.7% | |
| 51.92% | 53 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,626 | 60.9% | 44.8% | |
| 58.82% | 52 | 1.1 | 747 | 13,772 | 40.9% | 72.4% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.4 | 845 | 13,822 | 65.2% | 37.9% | |
| 53.06% | 50 | 1.2 | 835 | 13,393 | 65.0% | 44.8% | |
| 33.33% | 49 | 1.2 | 720 | 13,642 | 35.3% | 32.3% | |
| 50.00% | 49 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,459 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 29.79% | 48 | 1.2 | 747 | 12,634 | 30.4% | 29.2% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 1.3 | 828 | 13,831 | 41.7% | 41.7% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 1.9 | 801 | 14,003 | 45.8% | 63.6% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.3 | 828 | 13,489 | 44.4% | 63.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 5.3 | 853 | 13,207 | 65.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.8 | 652 | 12,035 | 36.8% | 43.5% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 1.4 | 769 | 13,128 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 1.3 | 739 | 12,058 | 46.1% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.8 | 832 | 14,857 | 63.6% | 44.8% | |
| 62.50% | 40 | 5.5 | 781 | 12,083 | 72.2% | 54.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.9 | 842 | 12,403 | 53.9% | 51.9% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 761 | 15,037 | 69.2% | 55.6% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.5 | 762 | 12,869 | 55.0% | 47.4% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.2 | 840 | 11,648 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 4.0 | 696 | 13,044 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 4.1 | 764 | 12,974 | 58.8% | 35.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 2.6 | 750 | 13,852 | 35.7% | 52.2% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 5.6 | 944 | 13,766 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 4.6 | 800 | 12,624 | 62.5% | 45.0% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,241 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 5.8 | 852 | 13,318 | 60.0% | 45.8% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 3.9 | 802 | 11,701 | 41.2% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.5 | 775 | 14,087 | 58.3% | 45.0% | |
| 67.74% | 32 | 5.3 | 782 | 13,111 | 61.5% | 72.2% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 2.0 | 834 | 14,050 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 783 | 13,525 | 53.9% | 38.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 5.5 | 817 | 11,348 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.3 | 766 | 15,397 | 71.4% | 47.6% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.2 | 789 | 12,815 | 42.9% | 30.8% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 4.8 | 777 | 12,473 | 90.9% | 56.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.1 | 680 | 13,576 | 46.1% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 816 | 14,253 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 1.9 | 699 | 12,777 | 53.3% | 20.0% | |
| 47.83% | 24 | 2.2 | 804 | 13,482 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.5 | 793 | 13,487 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.5 | 788 | 13,128 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 61.90% | 22 | 4.1 | 715 | 11,569 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 47.62% | 22 | 1.2 | 636 | 12,430 | 54.5% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 834 | 12,840 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.0 | 803 | 13,612 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.4 | 799 | 14,489 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 854 | 12,808 | 45.5% | 70.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 2.1 | 792 | 13,031 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 2.8 | 805 | 12,971 | 60.0% | 72.7% | |
| 36.84% | 20 | 1.5 | 585 | 12,767 | 23.1% | 66.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 781 | 11,683 | 52.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.6 | 774 | 13,331 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 18 | 5.9 | 967 | 12,533 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.2 | 922 | 13,413 | 77.8% | 55.6% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.2 | 745 | 12,401 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 17 | 5.7 | 890 | 13,685 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.5 | 876 | 13,455 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.3 | 876 | 11,808 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.5 | 805 | 12,087 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.8 | 706 | 12,581 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.9 | 761 | 14,095 | 83.3% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 747 | 11,660 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,896 | 33.3% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 13 | 5.8 | 849 | 11,394 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 787 | 11,704 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 854 | 12,529 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 968 | 11,781 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 717 | 12,662 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.5 | 830 | 12,565 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 858 | 13,266 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 781 | 12,828 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 734 | 10,226 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.0 | 939 | 12,468 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 829 | 12,939 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.1 | 780 | 13,079 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 744 | 13,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 9 | 1.2 | 672 | 12,677 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 848 | 13,422 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 691 | 12,493 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 654 | 11,213 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 755 | 15,214 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 844 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,700 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.3 | 1,055 | 13,918 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 703 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,069 | 14,765 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 639 | 11,309 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 879 | 14,052 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,690 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,996 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Karma - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Karma in League of Legends?
Karma wins the Fizz vs Karma matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 8 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fizz do against Karma in the early game?
In the early game, Karma has the advantage against Fizz with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Karma players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Karma in the late game?
In the late game, Karma takes over the Fizz vs Karma matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Karma scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Karma matchup?
Karma wins the matchup against Fizz with a 75.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 50.0 percentage point advantage means Karma is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 8 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Karma?
The best Fizz build against Karma includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff, Lich Bane with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Karma?
The best Fizz runes against Karma use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Karma matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Karma?
No, Fizz struggles against Karma with only a 25.0% win rate. Karma has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Karma's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Karma?
When playing Fizz against Karma, play cautiously and avoid Karma's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Karma has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.