Luxvs Cassiopeia
Lux vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Cassiopeia wins with a 56.5% win rate (+13.0%) over Lux based on 23 games. Lux wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Lux build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Lux Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Lux performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Lux vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Lux vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 23 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 56.5% win rate compared to Lux's 43.5%, giving Cassiopeia a 13.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Lux controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Lux needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Lux leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia has a strong advantage in this matchup. Lux players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Cassiopeia overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Lux vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Lux is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Lux holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Lux Build Against Cassiopeia
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Lux needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Lux against Cassiopeia are Luden's Echo, Stormsurge and Shadowflame. This combination gives Lux an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 4 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Lux60.0%
Cassiopeia40.0%Lux30.8%Cassiopeia69.2%Lux dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Lux can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 69.2% win rate — 38.5 points above Lux. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Lux must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Lux Runes Against Cassiopeia
Sorcery
Domination
The Sorcery and Domination rune setup gives Lux the best tools to compete against Cassiopeia in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Lux matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Lux's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Lux build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.84% | 711 | 2.3 | 724 | 9,900 | 48.5% | 45.9% | |
| 50.71% | 353 | 2.4 | 732 | 9,986 | 52.2% | 49.8% | |
| 50.00% | 302 | 2.1 | 697 | 9,487 | 59.0% | 43.9% | |
| 52.57% | 272 | 2.0 | 711 | 9,925 | 54.6% | 51.6% | |
| 53.06% | 245 | 2.2 | 751 | 10,188 | 57.3% | 50.6% | |
| 53.45% | 232 | 2.5 | 731 | 10,032 | 55.7% | 52.1% | |
| 51.53% | 229 | 2.2 | 688 | 10,661 | 50.7% | 51.9% | |
| 61.14% | 229 | 3.6 | 757 | 10,138 | 60.5% | 61.5% | |
| 46.63% | 208 | 2.0 | 691 | 9,122 | 54.2% | 41.6% | |
| 46.81% | 188 | 5.6 | 929 | 11,183 | 57.4% | 40.8% | |
| 42.25% | 187 | 3.5 | 787 | 10,858 | 38.1% | 44.4% | |
| 47.85% | 186 | 2.9 | 798 | 10,097 | 46.4% | 48.7% | |
| 50.28% | 177 | 6.0 | 936 | 11,945 | 50.0% | 50.4% | |
| 48.02% | 177 | 2.1 | 699 | 9,938 | 49.2% | 47.4% | |
| 52.57% | 175 | 2.8 | 719 | 10,509 | 53.3% | 52.2% | |
| 59.26% | 162 | 2.6 | 795 | 10,456 | 60.0% | 58.9% | |
| 46.20% | 158 | 2.4 | 716 | 10,342 | 58.8% | 40.2% | |
| 46.41% | 153 | 2.2 | 662 | 9,107 | 55.4% | 39.8% | |
| 49.01% | 151 | 5.8 | 839 | 10,744 | 49.2% | 48.8% | |
| 50.70% | 142 | 6.1 | 829 | 10,934 | 52.8% | 49.4% | |
| 45.99% | 137 | 2.1 | 648 | 9,242 | 50.9% | 42.3% | |
| 45.59% | 136 | 6.4 | 830 | 10,967 | 49.2% | 42.7% | |
| 51.11% | 135 | 5.2 | 864 | 10,711 | 54.7% | 48.8% | |
| 54.96% | 131 | 2.2 | 684 | 9,113 | 57.1% | 53.3% | |
| 48.46% | 130 | 2.1 | 773 | 9,547 | 62.8% | 39.2% | |
| 47.50% | 120 | 2.0 | 704 | 8,927 | 47.4% | 47.6% | |
| 52.14% | 117 | 2.1 | 594 | 9,445 | 57.1% | 47.5% | |
| 51.33% | 113 | 2.0 | 654 | 9,400 | 59.0% | 47.3% | |
| 55.45% | 110 | 6.1 | 783 | 10,908 | 53.7% | 56.5% | |
| 51.85% | 108 | 6.0 | 1,005 | 10,928 | 60.0% | 46.0% | |
| 53.27% | 107 | 4.4 | 761 | 10,733 | 66.7% | 45.6% | |
| 58.65% | 104 | 6.1 | 855 | 11,665 | 60.5% | 57.4% | |
| 49.02% | 102 | 2.6 | 711 | 10,301 | 48.5% | 49.3% | |
| 50.51% | 99 | 2.1 | 732 | 9,235 | 52.3% | 49.1% | |
| 42.11% | 95 | 6.0 | 797 | 10,268 | 50.0% | 35.9% | |
| 48.35% | 91 | 6.2 | 906 | 11,708 | 48.7% | 48.1% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 6.0 | 914 | 10,827 | 45.5% | 58.2% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 4.5 | 799 | 11,445 | 50.0% | 49.1% | |
| 68.24% | 85 | 6.2 | 918 | 12,168 | 77.8% | 61.2% | |
| 51.22% | 82 | 6.6 | 909 | 10,479 | 54.0% | 48.9% | |
| 54.32% | 81 | 2.1 | 690 | 8,999 | 48.6% | 58.7% | |
| 52.50% | 80 | 5.5 | 863 | 12,122 | 42.3% | 57.4% | |
| 45.00% | 80 | 2.0 | 798 | 10,515 | 45.5% | 44.8% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 2.2 | 716 | 10,192 | 67.7% | 41.3% | |
| 46.05% | 76 | 2.0 | 712 | 9,567 | 50.0% | 43.2% | |
| 48.00% | 75 | 5.7 | 791 | 10,783 | 41.9% | 52.3% | |
| 45.21% | 73 | 5.5 | 822 | 11,755 | 39.1% | 48.0% | |
| 45.71% | 70 | 4.2 | 815 | 11,748 | 52.6% | 43.1% | |
| 47.14% | 70 | 6.1 | 877 | 11,768 | 52.4% | 44.9% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 2.1 | 671 | 9,559 | 34.5% | 55.0% | |
| 41.18% | 68 | 2.7 | 720 | 9,597 | 55.6% | 31.7% | |
| 46.27% | 67 | 2.2 | 723 | 9,781 | 35.0% | 51.1% | |
| 43.08% | 65 | 5.8 | 906 | 12,556 | 28.6% | 47.1% | |
| 53.13% | 64 | 2.2 | 715 | 9,814 | 61.5% | 47.4% | |
| 58.33% | 60 | 5.7 | 864 | 11,414 | 54.2% | 61.1% | |
| 38.98% | 59 | 2.0 | 626 | 8,628 | 50.0% | 30.3% | |
| 39.29% | 56 | 2.1 | 732 | 10,045 | 47.6% | 34.3% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 6.5 | 942 | 11,509 | 45.8% | 65.5% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 6.5 | 838 | 10,653 | 45.5% | 44.8% | |
| 62.00% | 50 | 5.9 | 867 | 11,064 | 52.9% | 66.7% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 6.1 | 1,002 | 12,234 | 47.4% | 48.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 3.9 | 816 | 11,410 | 42.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 48 | 5.6 | 798 | 10,031 | 58.3% | 54.2% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 5.3 | 910 | 10,427 | 63.2% | 59.3% | |
| 69.57% | 46 | 6.1 | 841 | 12,755 | 64.3% | 71.9% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 3.5 | 764 | 11,382 | 75.0% | 54.8% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 5.5 | 795 | 10,700 | 64.3% | 44.8% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 5.8 | 908 | 10,860 | 58.8% | 50.0% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.2 | 898 | 11,557 | 63.6% | 47.6% | |
| 27.50% | 40 | 5.6 | 867 | 11,169 | 41.7% | 21.4% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 2.2 | 814 | 8,613 | 61.9% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 5.6 | 837 | 9,696 | 52.6% | 40.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 5.9 | 912 | 12,250 | 75.0% | 37.0% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 4.2 | 822 | 11,763 | 57.1% | 48.4% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 2.2 | 734 | 9,400 | 40.0% | 52.2% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 6.5 | 808 | 12,158 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 6.3 | 878 | 10,681 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 6.6 | 973 | 12,622 | 45.5% | 45.5% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 5.7 | 859 | 10,385 | 50.0% | 31.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.5 | 1,060 | 12,933 | 58.3% | 55.6% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.4 | 990 | 12,525 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 6.3 | 832 | 10,301 | 61.5% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 6.2 | 927 | 12,311 | 50.0% | 61.1% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 2.2 | 649 | 10,118 | 55.6% | 55.6% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.1 | 756 | 9,622 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.1 | 950 | 12,490 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 7.2 | 959 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 26.09% | 23 | 1.8 | 710 | 10,293 | 44.4% | 14.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.9 | 869 | 11,107 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.1 | 971 | 11,242 | 60.0% | 30.8% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.8 | 935 | 11,828 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 4.7 | 878 | 11,429 | 44.4% | 61.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.8 | 930 | 11,841 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 4.8 | 854 | 10,652 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 4.7 | 763 | 10,673 | 28.6% | 45.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.6 | 824 | 11,169 | 80.0% | 41.7% | |
| 82.35% | 17 | 3.9 | 792 | 10,297 | 88.9% | 75.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.5 | 912 | 11,291 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.5 | 785 | 10,289 | 14.3% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.4 | 729 | 8,693 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.7 | 973 | 12,004 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.9 | 851 | 10,530 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 716 | 9,598 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 3.8 | 978 | 11,303 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.3 | 842 | 10,286 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.3 | 958 | 10,061 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 940 | 13,984 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 632 | 8,357 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 817 | 10,883 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 1,191 | 13,988 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.2 | 1,001 | 13,562 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.0 | 871 | 9,821 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.7 | 788 | 12,458 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.3 | 825 | 10,285 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.0 | 721 | 11,645 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.4 | 754 | 12,421 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.4 | 974 | 9,994 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 883 | 8,313 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.2 | 966 | 13,221 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.8 | 767 | 8,807 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.8 | 717 | 12,998 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.8 | 948 | 13,506 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.4 | 807 | 10,356 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 959 | 11,454 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 1,002 | 8,848 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 525 | 7,857 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 737 | 11,645 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 841 | 11,915 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 736 | 10,268 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.0 | 703 | 8,162 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 769 | 13,157 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 1,018 | 10,809 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 652 | 10,747 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 760 | 9,537 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Lux vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Lux do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 56.5% win rate compared to Lux's 43.5%, a 13.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 23 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Lux do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Lux has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Lux players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Lux do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 69.2% win rate compared to 30.8%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Lux with a 56.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 13.0 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 23 games analyzed.
What is the best Lux build against Cassiopeia?
The best Lux build against Cassiopeia includes Luden's Echo, Stormsurge, Shadowflame with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Lux runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Lux runes against Cassiopeia use the Sorcery primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the Lux vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Lux counter Cassiopeia?
No, Lux struggles against Cassiopeia with only a 43.5% win rate. Cassiopeia has the advantage in this matchup. Lux players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Cassiopeia's lead.
How do I play Lux against Cassiopeia?
When playing Lux against Cassiopeia, play cautiously and avoid Cassiopeia's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Cassiopeia has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.