Win Rate
49.4%
Pick Rate
9.3%
Luxvs Fizz
Patch26.17
Matches368,800
LaneAll Lanes
TierAll Tiers
Last UpdatedAug 29, 2026 UTC
MethodologyData Methodology
AuthorDakota Chinnick
Lux vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.17. Fizz wins with a 53.0% win rate (+6.0%) over Lux based on 83 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Lux scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Lux build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Lux vs Fizz matchup.
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Lux Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Lux performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Compare against an opponent
Lux
47.0% WR
VS
Fizz
53.0% WR
Who Wins the Lux vs Fizz Matchup?
Winner
Fizz
Matches: 83
47.0%
53.0%
6.0
5.8
803
834
11,590
13,043
57
117
415
470
1.4
0.4
38.9%
61.1%
53.2%
46.8%
Lux vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Lux vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 83 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 53.0% win rate compared to Lux's 47.0%, giving Fizz a 6.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Lux outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Lux reaches their power spikes, while Lux should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Lux leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Lux players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Lux vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Lux, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Farming
6.0Lux
5.8Fizz
Lux and Fizz farm at nearly identical rates in this matchup, with only a 0.2 CS/min difference. Neither champion holds a meaningful farming advantage, so lane dominance will come from trading and jungle interaction rather than CS leads.Damage
803Lux
834Fizz
Fizz deals 31 more champion damage per minute than Lux. While noticeable in extended trades, this gap can be offset by Lux choosing favorable fight windows, such as engaging when Fizz's key abilities are on cooldown or trading immediately after dodging a skillshot.Economy
11,590Lux
13,043Fizz
Fizz generates a commanding 1,453 more gold per game than Lux. This substantial economic advantage means Fizz consistently reaches key item breakpoints earlier, creating a compounding lead that grows throughout the game. Lux should focus on cost-effective item choices and avoid unnecessary deaths to prevent falling further behind.Utility
1.4Lux
0.4Fizz
Lux brings significantly more crowd control than Fizz, with 0.9 more seconds of CC per minute. This large utility gap makes Lux far more valuable in setting up jungle ganks, controlling objectives, and locking down targets in team fights. Fizz should invest in tenacity and position carefully to avoid being chain-CC'd.Sustain
472Lux
587Fizz
Fizz heals and mitigates 116 more damage per minute than Lux, providing moderate extra durability. This sustain edge allows Fizz to stay in lane longer between recalls and gradually win extended wars of attrition. Consider building early grievous wounds if playing Lux.Best Lux Build Against Fizz
Boots
Core Items
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Lux needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Lux against Fizz are Luden's Echo, Stormsurge and Shadowflame. This combination gives Lux an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 71.4% win rate across 14 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Lux vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
⚔
Early Game
Fizz
61.1%
+22.2% advantage
Lux38.9%
Fizz61.1%♕
Late Game
Lux
53.2%
+6.4% advantage
Lux53.2%Fizz46.8%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 61.1% win rate — a 22.2 percentage point lead over Lux. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Lux is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 53.2% win rate — 6.4 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Lux, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lux reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lux survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Lux Runes Against Fizz
Sorcery
Domination
63.0% WR
The Sorcery and Domination rune setup gives Lux the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Lux matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.17. The table below shows Lux's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Lux build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.87% | 397 | 2.3 | 713 | 10,165 | 53.4% | 45.7% | |
| 51.27% | 236 | 2.1 | 701 | 10,303 | 53.2% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 222 | 2.3 | 702 | 10,392 | 49.4% | 44.0% | |
| 43.88% | 196 | 2.0 | 667 | 9,653 | 50.0% | 38.9% | |
| 47.89% | 190 | 2.0 | 685 | 9,776 | 48.9% | 46.9% | |
| 53.01% | 166 | 2.0 | 668 | 9,574 | 56.3% | 50.0% | |
| 56.96% | 158 | 2.2 | 742 | 10,160 | 61.1% | 53.5% | |
| 42.28% | 149 | 2.0 | 640 | 9,660 | 38.6% | 45.6% | |
| 50.00% | 144 | 2.0 | 675 | 9,964 | 49.2% | 50.6% | |
| 44.93% | 138 | 2.6 | 701 | 10,300 | 44.4% | 45.3% | |
| 42.75% | 138 | 5.6 | 898 | 11,293 | 50.8% | 35.2% | |
| 55.97% | 134 | 2.7 | 743 | 10,757 | 52.9% | 57.8% | |
| 48.84% | 129 | 3.6 | 744 | 10,980 | 43.9% | 51.1% | |
| 54.33% | 127 | 5.9 | 880 | 11,525 | 46.7% | 61.2% | |
| 50.81% | 124 | 2.4 | 719 | 11,031 | 60.4% | 44.7% | |
| 46.22% | 119 | 2.7 | 767 | 11,164 | 48.6% | 45.1% | |
| 45.69% | 116 | 2.1 | 698 | 9,860 | 48.9% | 43.7% | |
| 48.65% | 111 | 2.0 | 657 | 9,399 | 50.0% | 47.3% | |
| 48.62% | 109 | 3.6 | 729 | 10,933 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 48.57% | 105 | 6.6 | 836 | 11,479 | 42.3% | 54.7% | |
| 37.86% | 103 | 2.3 | 676 | 10,059 | 40.5% | 36.4% | |
| 48.04% | 102 | 1.9 | 621 | 9,255 | 37.2% | 55.9% | |
| 43.88% | 98 | 2.0 | 649 | 9,924 | 44.4% | 43.5% | |
| 54.17% | 96 | 6.1 | 912 | 11,449 | 49.0% | 60.0% | |
| 47.37% | 95 | 2.2 | 574 | 9,678 | 50.0% | 45.1% | |
| 51.06% | 94 | 6.1 | 875 | 11,693 | 56.4% | 47.3% | |
| 50.55% | 91 | 2.1 | 671 | 10,369 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 46.99% | 83 | 6.0 | 803 | 11,590 | 38.9% | 53.2% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 6.4 | 851 | 12,392 | 58.6% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 80 | 2.2 | 786 | 9,676 | 47.1% | 43.5% | |
| 44.87% | 78 | 2.0 | 738 | 9,684 | 54.0% | 36.6% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 6.3 | 861 | 12,083 | 61.3% | 50.0% | |
| 36.11% | 72 | 2.1 | 717 | 9,511 | 37.9% | 34.9% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 6.1 | 860 | 12,566 | 60.0% | 52.1% | |
| 51.56% | 64 | 2.0 | 741 | 10,032 | 48.3% | 54.3% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 5.7 | 878 | 11,884 | 37.5% | 56.4% | |
| 41.94% | 62 | 2.0 | 642 | 9,157 | 44.1% | 39.3% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 5.0 | 879 | 12,187 | 40.0% | 61.9% | |
| 50.88% | 57 | 4.6 | 758 | 11,250 | 47.6% | 52.8% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 3.8 | 737 | 10,981 | 55.6% | 53.3% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 2.5 | 697 | 10,431 | 36.8% | 65.7% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 1.9 | 696 | 10,225 | 56.0% | 46.4% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 6.3 | 863 | 11,652 | 52.0% | 53.6% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 2.1 | 696 | 9,761 | 58.3% | 37.9% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 6.0 | 897 | 11,103 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 6.3 | 828 | 11,406 | 47.8% | 64.3% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 4.8 | 865 | 11,712 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 59.57% | 47 | 4.8 | 924 | 12,157 | 66.7% | 55.2% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 5.1 | 777 | 12,528 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 2.1 | 674 | 10,718 | 45.5% | 36.4% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 2.9 | 682 | 11,527 | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 5.6 | 826 | 12,343 | 66.7% | 57.7% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 5.1 | 940 | 12,107 | 62.5% | 54.2% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 2.3 | 734 | 11,341 | 75.0% | 53.6% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 2.3 | 767 | 10,385 | 58.8% | 54.5% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 2.0 | 674 | 9,992 | 55.6% | 47.6% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 5.4 | 802 | 10,609 | 42.1% | 61.1% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 2.4 | 671 | 9,440 | 58.8% | 60.0% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 2.8 | 735 | 10,066 | 41.2% | 52.6% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 4.6 | 805 | 11,300 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.5 | 870 | 11,881 | 46.7% | 55.0% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.5 | 892 | 12,247 | 57.9% | 53.3% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 5.1 | 826 | 11,366 | 28.6% | 42.1% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.7 | 922 | 11,547 | 42.1% | 61.5% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.2 | 852 | 11,601 | 41.7% | 45.0% | |
| 29.03% | 31 | 2.0 | 701 | 9,763 | 41.7% | 21.1% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 6.4 | 1,009 | 13,497 | 76.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.7 | 892 | 10,961 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 4.6 | 871 | 13,049 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 5.9 | 862 | 11,077 | 69.2% | 41.2% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 5.1 | 949 | 11,722 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 2.7 | 661 | 9,643 | 35.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 5.2 | 923 | 10,721 | 43.8% | 69.2% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 6.7 | 876 | 13,464 | 63.6% | 43.8% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.9 | 855 | 11,059 | 61.1% | 44.4% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 5.7 | 822 | 12,482 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 6.0 | 1,037 | 10,437 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 5.6 | 957 | 11,948 | 60.0% | 56.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 816 | 11,646 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 5.4 | 840 | 11,872 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 5.7 | 748 | 11,460 | 62.5% | 64.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.6 | 866 | 11,980 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 4.9 | 809 | 11,785 | 16.7% | 69.2% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.4 | 969 | 12,857 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.5 | 1,076 | 13,352 | 25.0% | 53.9% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 6.0 | 887 | 10,774 | 11.1% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.0 | 889 | 14,095 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 5.0 | 959 | 12,210 | 60.0% | 18.2% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.4 | 776 | 11,841 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.0 | 746 | 9,496 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.6 | 738 | 10,504 | 83.3% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.2 | 703 | 9,307 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 1,030 | 12,974 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.7 | 961 | 12,279 | 80.0% | 14.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.4 | 822 | 10,428 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.6 | 847 | 13,608 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 6.1 | 1,020 | 11,679 | 20.0% | 16.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.2 | 778 | 11,376 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 669 | 10,225 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 681 | 9,883 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 764 | 8,148 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 1,030 | 16,206 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 915 | 11,913 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 650 | 11,384 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.8 | 959 | 10,672 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 895 | 10,565 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.4 | 644 | 9,051 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 666 | 10,417 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 1,035 | 9,810 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.7 | 631 | 10,731 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 1,143 | 14,170 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 947 | 12,744 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.3 | 641 | 10,962 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.7 | 798 | 11,160 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.5 | 1,096 | 11,070 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.6 | 975 | 14,110 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.1 | 577 | 7,586 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.7 | 596 | 10,050 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.7 | 719 | 10,681 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 589 | 10,079 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 1,101 | 12,485 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 1,105 | 9,104 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.8 | 941 | 14,335 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.1 | 663 | 11,631 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.7 | 567 | 9,339 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 994 | 14,236 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 862 | 10,519 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 1,033 | 11,041 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 911 | 12,600 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 1,055 | 13,479 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
MetaBot Desktop
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
🔍Report an Issue
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Lux vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Lux do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Lux vs Fizz matchup with a 53.0% win rate compared to Lux's 47.0%, a 6.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 83 recent ranked games in patch 26.17.
How does Lux do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Lux with a 61.1% win rate versus 38.9%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Lux do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Lux takes over the Lux vs Fizz matchup with a 53.2% win rate compared to 46.8%. Lux scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Lux vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Lux with a 53.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.17. The 6.0 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 83 games analyzed.
What is the best Lux build against Fizz?
The best Lux build against Fizz includes Luden's Echo, Stormsurge, Shadowflame with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 71.4% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Lux runes against Fizz?
The best Lux runes against Fizz use the Sorcery primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 63.0% win rate in the Lux vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Lux counter Fizz?
No, Lux struggles against Fizz with only a 47.0% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Lux players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Lux against Fizz?
When playing Lux against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Fizz in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
- Live in-game overlays while you play
- Every match tracked automatically
- Post-game AI coaching and breakdowns
Rated 5/5 Stars
Riot Approved