
Qiyanavs Lee Sin
Qiyana vs Lee Sin is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Lee Sin wins with a 52.4% win rate (+4.8%) over Qiyana based on 21 games. Qiyana wins the early laning phase while Lee Sin scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup.
Qiyana Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Qiyana performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Qiyana vs Lee Sin Matchup?

Qiyana vs Lee Sin Matchup Summary
The Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Lee Sin wins with a 52.4% win rate compared to Qiyana's 47.6%, giving Lee Sin a 4.8 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Qiyana controls the early laning stage, but Lee Sin outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Qiyana needs to press advantages before Lee Sin reaches their power spikes, while Lee Sin should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Lee Sin leads by 1,068 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Lee Sin is slightly favored, Qiyana can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Lee Sin's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Qiyana vs Lee Sin Laning Phase Breakdown
Qiyana is favored during the laning phase against Lee Sin, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Qiyana holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Qiyana Build Against Lee Sin
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Lee Sin, providing the mobility and stats Qiyana needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Qiyana against Lee Sin are Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra and Serylda's Grudge. This combination gives Qiyana an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Lee Sin. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Qiyana and Lee Sin, with Qiyana holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Lee Sin is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 53.9% win rate — 7.7 points above Qiyana. Extended games heavily favor Lee Sin, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Qiyana has the edge early, but Lee Sin gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Qiyana Runes Against Lee Sin
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Qiyana the best tools to compete against Lee Sin in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Qiyana matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Qiyana's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.59% | 68 | 6.1 | 893 | 11,939 | 55.3% | 33.3% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 5.7 | 867 | 12,379 | 62.5% | 48.5% | |
| 40.00% | 55 | 6.2 | 804 | 11,736 | 33.3% | 45.2% | |
| 31.37% | 51 | 5.5 | 796 | 11,153 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 6.2 | 810 | 12,191 | 40.9% | 36.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 6.1 | 1,038 | 13,418 | 61.1% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 5.8 | 921 | 12,529 | 41.2% | 56.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 5.8 | 879 | 11,980 | 41.2% | 54.2% | |
| 28.95% | 38 | 5.0 | 763 | 12,486 | 18.8% | 36.4% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 6.0 | 823 | 12,895 | 43.8% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 4.5 | 979 | 13,605 | 60.0% | 57.9% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 5.1 | 790 | 12,376 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.4 | 778 | 11,905 | 15.4% | 68.4% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.8 | 884 | 13,012 | 58.3% | 47.4% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.2 | 998 | 12,561 | 27.3% | 72.2% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.5 | 769 | 11,964 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.3 | 822 | 14,416 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 927 | 12,845 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.1 | 910 | 12,690 | 70.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 4.2 | 945 | 11,582 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 3.8 | 749 | 12,831 | 12.5% | 46.7% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 5.9 | 833 | 11,522 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.5 | 791 | 14,326 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.1 | 808 | 12,045 | 30.8% | 44.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.0 | 741 | 13,176 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.5 | 800 | 13,970 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.8 | 746 | 13,481 | 37.5% | 61.5% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 812 | 13,218 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.6 | 730 | 11,417 | 12.5% | 63.6% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.6 | 970 | 13,231 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.9 | 778 | 10,465 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.4 | 757 | 11,635 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.0 | 806 | 12,070 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.0 | 630 | 12,874 | 28.6% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.9 | 813 | 12,456 | 36.4% | 57.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.7 | 789 | 10,237 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.1 | 921 | 10,975 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.0 | 907 | 13,163 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.9 | 980 | 12,198 | 16.7% | 72.7% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.8 | 768 | 11,338 | 66.7% | 27.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.5 | 726 | 13,803 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 0.8 | 843 | 14,545 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 0.9 | 834 | 13,329 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 856 | 10,802 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 802 | 14,053 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.2 | 656 | 12,800 | 12.5% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 4.2 | 755 | 10,943 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.5 | 746 | 10,685 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 1,019 | 13,500 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,849 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 0.9 | 807 | 12,363 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.8 | 956 | 12,961 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 893 | 10,625 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 717 | 14,226 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 823 | 12,847 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,799 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 866 | 11,690 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.0 | 746 | 9,425 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.4 | 734 | 11,116 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 1,167 | 15,192 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 992 | 13,395 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 1.5 | 830 | 14,797 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.2 | 793 | 12,828 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.6 | 914 | 14,503 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 797 | 10,079 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 100.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 718 | 12,379 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.0 | 834 | 12,151 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.7 | 577 | 10,030 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.0 | 778 | 11,642 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 7 | 0.8 | 674 | 13,334 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.6 | 1,031 | 16,248 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.3 | 710 | 10,231 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.5 | 935 | 13,026 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 721 | 12,043 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.9 | 1,019 | 15,664 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 1,004 | 12,610 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 804 | 15,962 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 893 | 13,450 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.9 | 781 | 11,813 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 818 | 12,779 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 860 | 15,307 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 973 | 15,456 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 713 | 14,986 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 683 | 12,657 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 824 | 11,673 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 1,068 | 14,796 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 939 | 16,141 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.6 | 466 | 11,221 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Qiyana vs Lee Sin - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Qiyana do against Lee Sin in League of Legends?
Lee Sin wins the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup with a 52.4% win rate compared to Qiyana's 47.6%, a 4.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Qiyana do against Lee Sin in the early game?
In the early game, Qiyana has the advantage against Lee Sin with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Qiyana players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Qiyana do against Lee Sin in the late game?
In the late game, Lee Sin takes over the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup with a 53.9% win rate compared to 46.1%. Lee Sin scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup?
Lee Sin wins the matchup against Qiyana with a 52.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 4.8 percentage point advantage means Lee Sin is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Qiyana build against Lee Sin?
The best Qiyana build against Lee Sin includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra, Serylda's Grudge with Mercury's Treads. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Qiyana runes against Lee Sin?
The best Qiyana runes against Lee Sin use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Qiyana vs Lee Sin matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Qiyana counter Lee Sin?
No, Qiyana struggles against Lee Sin with only a 47.6% win rate. Lee Sin has the advantage in this matchup. Qiyana players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Lee Sin's lead.
How do I play Qiyana against Lee Sin?
When playing Qiyana against Lee Sin, play cautiously and avoid Lee Sin's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Lee Sin has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
