
Qiyanavs Tryndamere
Qiyana vs Tryndamere is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Qiyana wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Tryndamere based on 6 games. Qiyana holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup.
Qiyana Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Qiyana performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Qiyana vs Tryndamere Matchup?

Qiyana vs Tryndamere Matchup Summary
The Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Qiyana wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 50.0%, giving Qiyana a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Qiyana holds a slight edge in both the early and late game, but the margins are thin enough that individual skill and jungle attention will often determine the outcome. Tryndamere can still find windows through outplays and team coordination. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tryndamere leads by 742 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Qiyana has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Tryndamere's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Qiyana vs Tryndamere Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Qiyana, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Qiyana Build Against Tryndamere
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Tryndamere, providing the mobility and stats Qiyana needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Qiyana against Tryndamere are Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra and Serylda's Grudge. This combination gives Qiyana an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Tryndamere. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Qiyana and Tryndamere, with Qiyana holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Qiyana at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Tryndamere. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
This matchup is remarkably even at every stage of the game. Neither Qiyana nor Tryndamere has a phase-specific advantage, making this a pure skill matchup where individual mechanics, decision-making, and team coordination determine the outcome.
Best Qiyana Runes Against Tryndamere
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Qiyana maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Tryndamere.
Qiyana matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Qiyana's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.58% | 101 | 6.1 | 875 | 12,025 | 47.7% | 36.8% | |
| 40.40% | 99 | 6.1 | 823 | 12,425 | 45.5% | 37.9% | |
| 43.21% | 81 | 5.7 | 841 | 12,432 | 51.6% | 38.0% | |
| 49.32% | 73 | 5.9 | 976 | 12,511 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 51.39% | 72 | 6.0 | 808 | 11,451 | 44.4% | 58.3% | |
| 40.63% | 64 | 5.9 | 939 | 12,346 | 53.6% | 30.6% | |
| 32.14% | 56 | 4.9 | 779 | 12,051 | 28.6% | 35.7% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 848 | 12,067 | 57.1% | 44.8% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 5.6 | 756 | 11,949 | 30.8% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 5.3 | 881 | 11,695 | 40.0% | 43.5% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 5.9 | 828 | 12,634 | 60.0% | 43.8% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 6.0 | 847 | 11,341 | 35.0% | 64.0% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.5 | 933 | 11,603 | 50.0% | 52.4% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 5.8 | 756 | 11,896 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 5.3 | 823 | 11,378 | 31.6% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 6.0 | 936 | 11,492 | 38.1% | 46.7% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 6.0 | 872 | 11,743 | 50.0% | 55.0% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 6.2 | 866 | 12,263 | 47.1% | 42.1% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 1.2 | 718 | 12,713 | 47.1% | 35.3% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 4.6 | 803 | 11,777 | 23.1% | 47.4% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.2 | 812 | 12,705 | 45.5% | 55.0% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.7 | 808 | 11,021 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 3.4 | 856 | 12,392 | 46.1% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 3.9 | 809 | 11,732 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 5.7 | 783 | 11,845 | 60.0% | 47.1% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 6.4 | 961 | 12,028 | 53.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.7 | 807 | 12,588 | 61.5% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 5.6 | 910 | 12,292 | 30.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.5 | 868 | 15,131 | 71.4% | 33.3% | |
| 28.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 828 | 11,013 | 10.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 5.7 | 859 | 12,451 | 63.6% | 38.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.6 | 927 | 12,982 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.8 | 981 | 11,802 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.0 | 789 | 13,327 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 5.7 | 970 | 12,712 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 5.8 | 798 | 11,986 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 5.8 | 956 | 12,641 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.0 | 833 | 13,855 | 37.5% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.2 | 828 | 12,425 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 5.7 | 820 | 12,038 | 54.5% | 30.0% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 5.4 | 642 | 10,944 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 1.2 | 806 | 13,210 | 40.0% | 90.9% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 821 | 15,258 | 55.6% | 36.4% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 871 | 11,637 | 54.5% | 55.6% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.3 | 745 | 13,684 | 14.3% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 4.3 | 791 | 12,966 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 0.9 | 967 | 14,018 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 4.8 | 737 | 11,297 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.3 | 749 | 13,621 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 675 | 12,472 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.9 | 998 | 12,908 | 71.4% | 37.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.5 | 714 | 12,915 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.2 | 953 | 15,422 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.2 | 645 | 13,461 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.9 | 730 | 12,669 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 851 | 13,038 | 57.1% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 899 | 11,239 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 712 | 10,862 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.5 | 692 | 11,734 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.6 | 825 | 11,577 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 0.7 | 557 | 11,864 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.8 | 741 | 13,754 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.2 | 802 | 15,354 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.2 | 740 | 15,071 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 739 | 11,251 | 14.3% | 100.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 888 | 13,316 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 674 | 14,092 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 738 | 11,682 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 871 | 10,648 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 683 | 13,021 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 880 | 13,104 | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 796 | 12,940 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.4 | 782 | 12,800 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 1.8 | 838 | 13,391 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.1 | 825 | 12,352 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.1 | 770 | 13,247 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 845 | 10,393 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 0.7 | 594 | 10,552 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 540 | 8,542 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 0.7 | 662 | 14,626 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 5.4 | 796 | 11,320 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 0.9 | 835 | 13,662 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 961 | 12,813 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.0 | 828 | 11,225 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 740 | 12,911 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.6 | 901 | 12,411 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.5 | 1,144 | 16,117 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 1,001 | 11,062 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 794 | 14,435 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.2 | 1,225 | 18,386 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 859 | 12,862 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 1,029 | 14,578 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 724 | 11,198 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 941 | 12,710 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 724 | 9,107 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 788 | 13,866 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 692 | 10,681 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 718 | 11,617 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.6 | 746 | 13,574 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 804 | 12,488 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 894 | 12,820 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Qiyana vs Tryndamere - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Qiyana do against Tryndamere in League of Legends?
Qiyana wins the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Qiyana do against Tryndamere in the early game?
In the early game, Qiyana has the advantage against Tryndamere with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Qiyana players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Qiyana do against Tryndamere in the late game?
In the late game, Qiyana takes over the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Qiyana scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup?
Qiyana wins the matchup against Tryndamere with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Qiyana is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Qiyana build against Tryndamere?
The best Qiyana build against Tryndamere includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra, Serylda's Grudge with Crimson Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Qiyana runes against Tryndamere?
The best Qiyana runes against Tryndamere use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Qiyana vs Tryndamere matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Qiyana counter Tryndamere?
Yes, Qiyana has a favorable matchup against Tryndamere with a 50.0% win rate. Qiyana slightly edges out Tryndamere in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Qiyana against Tryndamere?
When playing Qiyana against Tryndamere, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
