Sennavs Fizz
Senna vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Senna based on 7 games. Senna wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Senna build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Senna vs Fizz matchup.
Senna Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Senna performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(28.6%)Who Wins the Senna vs Fizz Matchup?
Senna vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Senna vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Senna's 28.6%, giving Fizz a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Senna controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Senna needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Senna leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Senna players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Senna vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Senna is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Senna holds advantages in damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Senna Build Against Fizz
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Senna needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Senna against Fizz are Rapid Firecannon, Statikk Shiv and Black Cleaver. This combination gives Senna an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Senna vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Senna66.7%Fizz33.3%Senna0.0%Fizz100.0%Senna dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Senna can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Senna. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Senna must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Senna Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Senna the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Senna matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Senna's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Senna build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.43% | 435 | 1.7 | 574 | 10,094 | 42.3% | 54.2% | |
| 49.32% | 365 | 6.2 | 911 | 13,470 | 46.3% | 51.4% | |
| 53.30% | 364 | 1.6 | 640 | 9,985 | 52.4% | 54.2% | |
| 51.08% | 323 | 1.8 | 551 | 10,312 | 39.7% | 58.9% | |
| 53.48% | 316 | 1.5 | 610 | 10,117 | 51.4% | 55.1% | |
| 53.09% | 307 | 5.3 | 726 | 11,656 | 50.0% | 55.5% | |
| 49.81% | 265 | 1.5 | 595 | 10,300 | 48.0% | 51.4% | |
| 50.19% | 263 | 6.0 | 748 | 12,843 | 54.0% | 47.4% | |
| 47.30% | 241 | 2.3 | 638 | 11,308 | 43.7% | 49.4% | |
| 47.37% | 209 | 1.6 | 620 | 10,106 | 46.0% | 48.4% | |
| 45.26% | 190 | 1.7 | 645 | 11,005 | 50.7% | 42.1% | |
| 48.31% | 178 | 1.5 | 608 | 9,481 | 49.0% | 47.6% | |
| 47.67% | 172 | 1.6 | 616 | 10,638 | 47.8% | 47.6% | |
| 45.03% | 171 | 1.5 | 585 | 9,803 | 52.9% | 37.2% | |
| 48.48% | 165 | 1.5 | 632 | 9,439 | 49.4% | 47.4% | |
| 44.24% | 165 | 6.1 | 796 | 12,870 | 43.6% | 44.8% | |
| 46.67% | 165 | 5.9 | 773 | 12,766 | 52.3% | 43.0% | |
| 51.88% | 160 | 1.5 | 576 | 9,904 | 46.5% | 56.2% | |
| 55.70% | 158 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,043 | 47.5% | 60.8% | |
| 51.68% | 149 | 5.3 | 772 | 12,581 | 49.3% | 53.8% | |
| 52.11% | 142 | 1.5 | 526 | 10,138 | 58.1% | 47.5% | |
| 50.71% | 140 | 2.2 | 672 | 11,013 | 60.0% | 46.3% | |
| 55.07% | 138 | 1.6 | 611 | 10,163 | 53.1% | 56.8% | |
| 50.00% | 134 | 1.8 | 586 | 11,220 | 54.4% | 47.7% | |
| 53.79% | 132 | 1.6 | 619 | 10,096 | 56.7% | 51.4% | |
| 57.69% | 130 | 1.7 | 604 | 10,650 | 52.1% | 61.0% | |
| 55.91% | 127 | 1.5 | 689 | 10,240 | 48.5% | 63.9% | |
| 60.00% | 125 | 1.5 | 637 | 9,944 | 63.1% | 56.7% | |
| 50.81% | 124 | 1.6 | 737 | 9,395 | 56.9% | 44.1% | |
| 55.26% | 114 | 1.8 | 609 | 10,609 | 47.7% | 60.0% | |
| 52.63% | 114 | 1.4 | 590 | 9,614 | 55.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 90 | 6.0 | 841 | 13,148 | 48.8% | 57.5% | |
| 54.32% | 81 | 5.9 | 848 | 13,222 | 65.8% | 44.2% | |
| 58.02% | 81 | 2.6 | 688 | 11,234 | 56.7% | 58.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 1.5 | 614 | 9,840 | 57.5% | 43.2% | |
| 44.74% | 76 | 1.5 | 695 | 10,966 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 49.30% | 71 | 6.1 | 840 | 12,679 | 53.3% | 46.3% | |
| 50.70% | 71 | 1.5 | 570 | 9,810 | 59.4% | 43.6% | |
| 41.18% | 68 | 6.0 | 797 | 13,299 | 50.0% | 34.2% | |
| 56.06% | 66 | 6.5 | 862 | 13,532 | 66.7% | 47.2% | |
| 44.44% | 63 | 1.7 | 656 | 10,203 | 57.6% | 30.0% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.5 | 651 | 10,420 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 5.0 | 557 | 11,062 | 53.6% | 45.2% | |
| 62.71% | 59 | 1.6 | 676 | 10,879 | 53.9% | 69.7% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 2.4 | 613 | 10,632 | 36.8% | 52.8% | |
| 48.15% | 54 | 5.7 | 634 | 11,139 | 37.0% | 59.3% | |
| 43.40% | 53 | 5.8 | 829 | 11,680 | 48.1% | 38.5% | |
| 58.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 607 | 10,944 | 42.1% | 67.7% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.8 | 636 | 11,543 | 37.5% | 51.5% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 6.7 | 883 | 12,915 | 59.1% | 62.5% | |
| 67.44% | 43 | 1.6 | 664 | 11,215 | 80.0% | 60.7% | |
| 62.50% | 40 | 3.4 | 671 | 11,161 | 56.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.3 | 860 | 12,667 | 36.8% | 61.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 2.4 | 674 | 10,652 | 53.3% | 39.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 5.7 | 851 | 13,483 | 33.3% | 65.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 5.4 | 766 | 11,808 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 36 | 6.5 | 820 | 11,876 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 2.6 | 663 | 11,419 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 1.4 | 733 | 10,011 | 78.6% | 52.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 2.3 | 643 | 10,530 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 5.1 | 696 | 11,827 | 30.8% | 72.2% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 1.5 | 612 | 9,670 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 5.2 | 756 | 12,848 | 54.5% | 35.3% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.2 | 895 | 13,806 | 50.0% | 43.8% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.6 | 750 | 12,728 | 20.0% | 56.3% | |
| 32.00% | 25 | 6.2 | 830 | 11,049 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 762 | 11,908 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 2.8 | 662 | 11,769 | 42.9% | 35.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 2.5 | 562 | 11,267 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 2.7 | 821 | 11,336 | 44.4% | 70.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 3.1 | 823 | 10,592 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.9 | 573 | 9,969 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.9 | 558 | 10,407 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 597 | 10,160 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.8 | 605 | 9,174 | 22.2% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 559 | 10,633 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 5.6 | 820 | 10,514 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.7 | 861 | 12,538 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 3.0 | 760 | 12,798 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.9 | 673 | 11,022 | 60.0% | 22.2% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.1 | 634 | 12,161 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.4 | 674 | 12,639 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.5 | 552 | 9,415 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.3 | 857 | 11,166 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.0 | 911 | 11,067 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 685 | 8,772 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 749 | 11,447 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 2.1 | 735 | 9,699 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.3 | 661 | 13,783 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.1 | 714 | 13,055 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 741 | 12,006 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 788 | 10,161 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.5 | 823 | 11,071 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 789 | 12,774 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 760 | 14,570 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.2 | 594 | 8,524 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.4 | 737 | 13,100 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 768 | 9,200 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.6 | 885 | 14,314 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.4 | 717 | 11,836 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.7 | 674 | 10,483 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.6 | 605 | 9,540 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.0 | 586 | 8,778 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.1 | 626 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 830 | 12,923 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.0 | 670 | 11,130 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.4 | 911 | 13,479 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.9 | 878 | 12,067 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 654 | 9,859 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 769 | 11,052 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 962 | 14,888 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.7 | 830 | 13,253 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 628 | 11,445 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 909 | 13,037 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,081 | 8,434 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 762 | 11,983 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 517 | 7,984 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 424 | 8,396 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 849 | 9,671 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Senna vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Senna do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Senna vs Fizz matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Senna's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Senna do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Senna has the advantage against Fizz with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Senna players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Senna do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Senna vs Fizz matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Senna vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Senna with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Senna build against Fizz?
The best Senna build against Fizz includes Rapid Firecannon, Statikk Shiv, Black Cleaver with Boots of Swiftness. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Senna runes against Fizz?
The best Senna runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Senna vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Senna counter Fizz?
No, Senna struggles against Fizz with only a 28.6% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Senna players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Senna against Fizz?
When playing Senna against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.