Seraphinevs Ziggs
Seraphine vs Ziggs is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.12. Ziggs wins with a 55.6% win rate (+11.1%) over Seraphine based on 9 games. Seraphine wins the early laning phase while Ziggs scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Ziggs Matchup?
Seraphine vs Ziggs Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Ziggs wins with a 55.6% win rate compared to Seraphine's 44.4%, giving Ziggs a 11.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Seraphine controls the early laning stage, but Ziggs outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Seraphine needs to press advantages before Ziggs reaches their power spikes, while Ziggs should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Seraphine leads by 213 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ziggs has a strong advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ziggs overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Ziggs Laning Phase Breakdown
Seraphine is favored during the laning phase against Ziggs, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Seraphine holds advantages in gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine66.7%
Ziggs33.3%Seraphine33.3%Ziggs66.7%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Ziggs. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ziggs is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Seraphine. Extended games heavily favor Ziggs, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Seraphine must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ziggs reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ziggs survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Ziggs
Sorcery
Resolve
The Sorcery and Resolve rune setup gives Seraphine the best tools to compete against Ziggs in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.12. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.28% | 349 | 1.6 | 451 | 9,234 | 42.4% | 51.0% | |
| 51.76% | 284 | 2.9 | 602 | 10,262 | 51.2% | 52.2% | |
| 54.35% | 230 | 1.3 | 486 | 9,184 | 58.3% | 51.2% | |
| 49.76% | 209 | 1.4 | 492 | 8,620 | 50.0% | 49.5% | |
| 51.72% | 203 | 1.4 | 491 | 9,092 | 57.8% | 46.9% | |
| 52.02% | 198 | 1.4 | 505 | 9,047 | 56.0% | 48.0% | |
| 45.92% | 196 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,302 | 53.0% | 42.3% | |
| 51.70% | 147 | 2.0 | 507 | 10,176 | 55.8% | 49.5% | |
| 47.89% | 142 | 1.4 | 486 | 8,582 | 41.8% | 55.6% | |
| 46.32% | 136 | 1.5 | 480 | 9,475 | 49.1% | 44.2% | |
| 56.49% | 131 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,463 | 54.0% | 58.0% | |
| 50.41% | 123 | 1.4 | 391 | 8,601 | 59.0% | 41.9% | |
| 60.68% | 117 | 1.5 | 465 | 9,367 | 57.5% | 62.3% | |
| 52.17% | 115 | 1.4 | 462 | 8,577 | 48.5% | 57.1% | |
| 52.63% | 114 | 1.4 | 457 | 8,670 | 46.5% | 58.9% | |
| 48.65% | 111 | 1.5 | 489 | 8,655 | 46.4% | 50.9% | |
| 66.36% | 110 | 1.5 | 478 | 8,680 | 70.2% | 62.3% | |
| 58.82% | 102 | 1.7 | 578 | 9,610 | 52.4% | 63.3% | |
| 54.00% | 100 | 1.3 | 431 | 8,872 | 42.2% | 63.6% | |
| 55.00% | 100 | 2.2 | 513 | 9,585 | 42.2% | 65.5% | |
| 54.08% | 98 | 1.4 | 492 | 9,434 | 48.7% | 57.6% | |
| 52.38% | 84 | 1.4 | 581 | 8,920 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 48.19% | 83 | 1.9 | 490 | 9,446 | 46.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.96% | 79 | 1.5 | 512 | 9,267 | 61.8% | 53.3% | |
| 53.52% | 71 | 1.5 | 479 | 8,967 | 55.6% | 51.4% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.2 | 411 | 8,694 | 43.8% | 42.1% | |
| 60.94% | 64 | 4.9 | 647 | 11,064 | 57.7% | 63.2% | |
| 36.51% | 63 | 1.5 | 509 | 8,746 | 36.7% | 36.4% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,033 | 53.6% | 45.7% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 6.2 | 788 | 11,711 | 64.0% | 43.3% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.4 | 523 | 8,826 | 65.5% | 35.0% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.4 | 467 | 9,325 | 52.6% | 53.3% | |
| 61.70% | 47 | 6.7 | 783 | 13,230 | 66.7% | 59.4% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 1.6 | 471 | 9,397 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 68.09% | 47 | 5.5 | 719 | 11,908 | 70.8% | 65.2% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 1.4 | 520 | 9,319 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 71.05% | 38 | 5.4 | 798 | 12,439 | 68.8% | 72.7% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 1.2 | 519 | 8,754 | 50.0% | 78.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.8 | 793 | 11,963 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.6 | 471 | 10,042 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 574 | 8,911 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 3.9 | 554 | 10,367 | 76.9% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.3 | 472 | 8,739 | 61.5% | 36.4% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.3 | 817 | 13,004 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.5 | 593 | 9,192 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.8 | 409 | 8,198 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 1.8 | 514 | 9,142 | 63.6% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.4 | 975 | 15,138 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.4 | 519 | 8,851 | 41.7% | 77.8% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 3.2 | 538 | 9,937 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 593 | 9,224 | 41.7% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.0 | 823 | 12,581 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.8 | 820 | 12,295 | 72.7% | 14.3% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.2 | 598 | 9,887 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.0 | 739 | 13,049 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.7 | 800 | 12,244 | 30.0% | 71.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.5 | 820 | 13,111 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.0 | 786 | 12,948 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 2.9 | 597 | 8,641 | 62.5% | 88.9% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.9 | 703 | 11,620 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.5 | 735 | 11,253 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.4 | 435 | 9,442 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 3.9 | 637 | 10,969 | 33.3% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.9 | 758 | 11,644 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 1.5 | 509 | 9,576 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.3 | 861 | 11,236 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.3 | 639 | 10,775 | 20.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.6 | 469 | 9,510 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.9 | 903 | 13,743 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.5 | 504 | 7,856 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.7 | 554 | 11,901 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 881 | 13,542 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 90.91% | 11 | 1.5 | 562 | 11,136 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 696 | 11,133 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 625 | 10,413 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 702 | 14,412 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 476 | 10,114 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 670 | 8,898 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 713 | 11,505 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.0 | 724 | 11,125 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 808 | 12,652 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 476 | 7,952 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 429 | 7,817 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.0 | 442 | 7,996 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.2 | 568 | 11,632 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.4 | 423 | 7,097 | 83.3% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.2 | 917 | 14,117 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.7 | 477 | 8,563 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.4 | 685 | 11,992 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 591 | 8,281 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.2 | 566 | 13,537 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 746 | 11,794 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 665 | 10,744 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 710 | 12,962 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 482 | 8,866 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 349 | 7,805 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 574 | 9,795 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 445 | 10,612 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Ziggs - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Ziggs in League of Legends?
Ziggs wins the Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to Seraphine's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.12.
How does Seraphine do against Ziggs in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Ziggs with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Ziggs in the late game?
In the late game, Ziggs takes over the Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Ziggs scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup?
Ziggs wins the matchup against Seraphine with a 55.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.12. The 11.1 percentage point advantage means Ziggs is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Ziggs?
The best Seraphine build against Ziggs includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Ziggs?
The best Seraphine runes against Ziggs use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Ziggs matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Ziggs?
No, Seraphine struggles against Ziggs with only a 44.4% win rate. Ziggs has the advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ziggs's lead.
How do I play Seraphine against Ziggs?
When playing Seraphine against Ziggs, play cautiously and avoid Ziggs's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ziggs has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.