Settvs Olaf
Sett vs Olaf is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Sett wins with a 54.6% win rate (+9.3%) over Olaf based on 86 games. Sett wins the early laning phase while Olaf scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Sett build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Sett vs Olaf matchup.
Sett Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Sett performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Sett vs Olaf Matchup?
Sett vs Olaf Matchup Summary
The Sett vs Olaf matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 86 recent matches analyzed, Sett wins with a 54.6% win rate compared to Olaf's 45.4%, giving Sett a 9.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Sett controls the early laning stage, but Olaf outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Sett needs to press advantages before Olaf reaches their power spikes, while Olaf should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Sett leads by 0.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Sett players can confidently pick into Olaf and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Olaf away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Sett vs Olaf Laning Phase Breakdown
Sett is favored during the laning phase against Olaf, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Sett holds advantages in damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Sett Build Against Olaf
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Olaf, providing the mobility and stats Sett needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Sett against Olaf are Stridebreaker, Blade of The Ruined King and Black Cleaver. This combination gives Sett an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Olaf. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Sett vs Olaf matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Sett64.9%
Olaf35.1%Sett46.9%Olaf53.1%Sett dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 64.9% win rate — a 29.7 percentage point lead over Olaf. This lopsided early game means Sett can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 53.1% win rate — 6.1 points above Sett. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Sett must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Olaf reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Olaf survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Sett Runes Against Olaf
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Sett to press their advantage against Olaf, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Sett matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Sett's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Sett build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.18% | 299 | 6.4 | 997 | 13,069 | 54.2% | 54.2% | |
| 50.38% | 266 | 5.8 | 956 | 11,578 | 49.6% | 51.1% | |
| 53.38% | 266 | 5.8 | 906 | 11,966 | 56.3% | 51.3% | |
| 51.98% | 177 | 5.7 | 799 | 12,533 | 59.7% | 47.8% | |
| 49.12% | 171 | 6.0 | 797 | 11,438 | 51.3% | 47.3% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 6.3 | 908 | 11,944 | 49.3% | 52.8% | |
| 48.15% | 162 | 5.9 | 856 | 11,197 | 47.2% | 48.9% | |
| 56.95% | 151 | 6.2 | 923 | 12,116 | 57.1% | 56.8% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 6.0 | 930 | 11,560 | 46.5% | 56.8% | |
| 44.60% | 139 | 6.0 | 1,293 | 12,132 | 51.8% | 39.8% | |
| 51.82% | 137 | 6.0 | 1,055 | 11,745 | 47.4% | 55.0% | |
| 54.48% | 134 | 6.4 | 1,081 | 12,542 | 57.6% | 52.0% | |
| 46.51% | 129 | 5.5 | 939 | 10,869 | 43.9% | 49.2% | |
| 45.83% | 120 | 6.2 | 807 | 11,682 | 40.4% | 50.8% | |
| 51.26% | 119 | 6.2 | 998 | 12,832 | 51.1% | 51.4% | |
| 54.55% | 110 | 6.1 | 883 | 12,226 | 55.1% | 54.1% | |
| 46.30% | 108 | 6.0 | 970 | 11,537 | 36.0% | 55.2% | |
| 44.55% | 101 | 5.9 | 876 | 10,474 | 44.6% | 44.4% | |
| 41.00% | 100 | 6.1 | 845 | 11,795 | 36.1% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 6.1 | 852 | 12,476 | 48.8% | 50.9% | |
| 55.10% | 98 | 6.4 | 860 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 59.6% | |
| 42.71% | 96 | 6.1 | 995 | 11,661 | 46.3% | 40.0% | |
| 55.32% | 94 | 6.6 | 924 | 11,731 | 54.7% | 56.1% | |
| 67.03% | 91 | 5.9 | 1,107 | 11,999 | 64.3% | 69.4% | |
| 51.11% | 90 | 5.4 | 805 | 10,783 | 42.5% | 60.5% | |
| 52.27% | 88 | 5.9 | 1,037 | 12,885 | 50.0% | 53.6% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 5.5 | 1,013 | 10,211 | 54.4% | 38.1% | |
| 44.19% | 86 | 5.5 | 704 | 10,438 | 56.8% | 34.7% | |
| 54.65% | 86 | 6.3 | 986 | 12,249 | 64.9% | 46.9% | |
| 48.84% | 86 | 6.0 | 941 | 12,257 | 48.7% | 48.9% | |
| 39.29% | 84 | 6.4 | 901 | 12,377 | 21.2% | 51.0% | |
| 51.85% | 81 | 5.8 | 826 | 11,578 | 51.4% | 52.2% | |
| 44.74% | 76 | 5.9 | 1,035 | 12,119 | 39.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.89% | 74 | 6.2 | 954 | 11,562 | 44.4% | 39.5% | |
| 47.22% | 72 | 6.1 | 1,021 | 12,280 | 55.6% | 42.2% | |
| 58.57% | 70 | 6.3 | 854 | 12,308 | 69.4% | 47.1% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 5.8 | 844 | 11,545 | 54.2% | 43.6% | |
| 51.61% | 62 | 6.0 | 755 | 11,131 | 52.0% | 51.4% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 5.8 | 1,070 | 12,329 | 44.0% | 58.3% | |
| 43.86% | 57 | 5.2 | 699 | 11,231 | 43.5% | 44.1% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 5.6 | 745 | 10,590 | 44.0% | 47.6% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 6.2 | 881 | 12,780 | 41.7% | 45.5% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 6.0 | 791 | 11,834 | 59.1% | 47.6% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.1 | 903 | 12,305 | 57.9% | 40.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 5.8 | 900 | 11,776 | 72.2% | 31.8% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 5.2 | 921 | 13,071 | 72.2% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 5.5 | 917 | 12,424 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 5.5 | 673 | 10,896 | 26.7% | 45.0% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 5.8 | 795 | 11,189 | 61.5% | 45.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 5.8 | 733 | 11,045 | 25.0% | 64.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 836 | 12,312 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.8 | 762 | 11,956 | 77.8% | 46.7% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 5.9 | 796 | 10,808 | 47.1% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 5.0 | 837 | 12,332 | 25.0% | 43.8% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.0 | 1,062 | 12,827 | 40.0% | 69.2% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.1 | 785 | 11,328 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 4.0 | 902 | 11,475 | 54.5% | 40.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 4.8 | 913 | 11,813 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.0 | 593 | 11,180 | 70.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.4 | 885 | 12,989 | 80.0% | 36.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.5 | 783 | 12,327 | 0.0% | 70.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,120 | 13,252 | 25.0% | 70.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.8 | 935 | 12,172 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.4 | 805 | 13,325 | 100.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.0 | 915 | 12,563 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 790 | 12,555 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 3.8 | 814 | 10,690 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 3.3 | 800 | 10,442 | 85.7% | 40.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.2 | 993 | 11,638 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 724 | 9,534 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.2 | 671 | 11,080 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.5 | 943 | 12,282 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.2 | 688 | 11,275 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 5.5 | 1,028 | 13,145 | 75.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 798 | 11,783 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 1,146 | 13,671 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 774 | 11,346 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 560 | 9,658 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 646 | 10,320 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 902 | 13,923 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.8 | 723 | 11,702 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 4.6 | 801 | 11,703 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 4.3 | 1,085 | 13,333 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.3 | 691 | 11,150 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 917 | 11,419 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 779 | 11,034 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.5 | 624 | 10,495 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.6 | 925 | 11,258 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.9 | 683 | 9,731 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 1,069 | 13,000 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 1,373 | 15,008 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.2 | 433 | 7,982 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 858 | 10,502 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.3 | 814 | 10,418 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.2 | 768 | 11,278 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 764 | 11,182 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.8 | 560 | 9,826 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 410 | 8,092 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 608 | 15,111 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 489 | 8,727 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 518 | 9,040 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.9 | 668 | 12,330 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.3 | 796 | 8,487 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 701 | 10,863 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 672 | 9,761 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 1,138 | 17,518 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 1,047 | 12,045 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 775 | 13,530 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 867 | 12,559 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 672 | 9,858 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 479 | 8,667 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 834 | 8,701 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 648 | 9,795 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 986 | 13,685 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 782 | 10,436 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 841 | 10,892 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 643 | 8,302 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 1,148 | 13,543 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 811 | 14,040 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 1,084 | 14,328 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 711 | 11,704 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sett vs Olaf - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Sett do against Olaf in League of Legends?
Sett wins the Sett vs Olaf matchup with a 54.6% win rate compared to Olaf's 45.4%, a 9.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 86 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Sett do against Olaf in the early game?
In the early game, Sett has the advantage against Olaf with a 64.9% win rate versus 35.1%. Sett players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Sett do against Olaf in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Sett vs Olaf matchup with a 53.1% win rate compared to 46.9%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Sett vs Olaf matchup?
Sett wins the matchup against Olaf with a 54.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 9.3 percentage point advantage means Sett is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 86 games analyzed.
What is the best Sett build against Olaf?
The best Sett build against Olaf includes Stridebreaker, Blade of The Ruined King, Black Cleaver with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Sett runes against Olaf?
The best Sett runes against Olaf use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 62.5% win rate in the Sett vs Olaf matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Sett counter Olaf?
Yes, Sett has a favorable matchup against Olaf with a 54.6% win rate. Sett strongly counters Olaf in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Sett against Olaf?
When playing Sett against Olaf, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.