
Syndra vs Nilah is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.16. Syndra wins with a 62.5% win rate (+25.0%) over Nilah based on 8 games. Nilah wins the early laning phase while Syndra scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Syndra build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Syndra vs Nilah matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Syndra performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Syndra vs Nilah matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 8 recent matches analyzed, Syndra wins with a 62.5% win rate compared to Nilah's 37.5%, giving Syndra a 25.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Nilah controls the early laning stage, but Syndra outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Nilah needs to press advantages before Syndra reaches their power spikes, while Syndra should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Syndra leads by 1.1s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Syndra players can confidently pick into Nilah and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Nilah away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Nilah is favored during the laning phase against Syndra, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Nilah holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Nilah dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Syndra. This lopsided early game means Nilah can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Syndra is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 80.0% win rate — 60.0 points above Nilah. Extended games heavily favor Syndra, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Nilah must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Syndra reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Syndra survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Running Inspiration primary with Precision secondary allows Syndra to press their advantage against Nilah, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Syndra matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.16. The table below shows Syndra's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Syndra build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.92% | 144 | 6.8 | 946 | 13,518 | 42.9% | 50.5% | |
| 50.00% | 136 | 7.0 | 932 | 13,233 | 50.9% | 49.4% | |
| 50.75% | 134 | 6.3 | 813 | 12,090 | 52.5% | 49.3% | |
| 54.05% | 111 | 6.7 | 913 | 12,641 | 52.9% | 55.0% | |
| 47.17% | 106 | 7.2 | 912 | 12,393 | 48.9% | 45.9% | |
| 45.10% | 102 | 6.9 | 854 | 13,345 | 53.2% | 38.2% | |
| 58.33% | 96 | 7.0 | 892 | 12,917 | 54.5% | 61.5% | |
| 49.44% | 89 | 6.6 | 743 | 11,593 | 51.2% | 47.8% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 6.5 | 907 | 11,530 | 38.8% | 59.5% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 6.9 | 843 | 12,670 | 54.5% | 62.0% | |
| 52.44% | 82 | 7.1 | 894 | 13,167 | 59.5% | 45.0% | |
| 54.32% | 81 | 6.7 | 878 | 13,270 | 64.9% | 45.5% | |
| 35.06% | 77 | 6.6 | 835 | 12,206 | 23.3% | 42.5% | |
| 58.67% | 75 | 6.8 | 1,021 | 12,196 | 54.3% | 62.5% | |
| 54.69% | 64 | 6.5 | 901 | 11,599 | 54.0% | 55.6% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 6.7 | 869 | 12,788 | 50.0% | 43.8% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 6.6 | 1,032 | 12,992 | 52.0% | 55.3% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 7.1 | 881 | 13,022 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.67% | 60 | 6.8 | 831 | 13,305 | 60.7% | 53.1% | |
| 50.00% | 60 | 6.6 | 890 | 12,210 | 42.3% | 55.9% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 7.0 | 887 | 13,416 | 45.8% | 57.1% | |
| 60.34% | 58 | 6.9 | 958 | 12,807 | 63.3% | 57.1% | |
| 44.83% | 58 | 6.7 | 971 | 12,060 | 34.8% | 51.4% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 6.7 | 879 | 12,832 | 34.8% | 59.4% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 6.9 | 870 | 12,145 | 44.8% | 53.9% | |
| 32.08% | 53 | 6.5 | 825 | 12,065 | 31.6% | 32.4% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.7 | 1,132 | 13,059 | 65.2% | 55.2% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.7 | 897 | 13,556 | 45.5% | 63.4% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 6.6 | 928 | 11,897 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 7.1 | 861 | 12,087 | 57.1% | 54.2% | |
| 37.78% | 45 | 6.6 | 881 | 11,516 | 33.3% | 41.7% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 7.0 | 937 | 12,963 | 40.9% | 58.8% | |
| 23.68% | 38 | 6.7 | 946 | 12,925 | 35.3% | 14.3% | |
| 64.86% | 37 | 7.4 | 1,099 | 13,812 | 73.3% | 59.1% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.8 | 991 | 12,552 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 7.3 | 862 | 13,552 | 47.4% | 33.3% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 7.0 | 834 | 13,660 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 7.2 | 996 | 12,776 | 38.5% | 79.0% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 6.9 | 888 | 12,815 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.2 | 820 | 13,096 | 54.5% | 45.0% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 6.3 | 844 | 12,798 | 70.6% | 53.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 7.2 | 813 | 12,277 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.7 | 834 | 11,914 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 7.0 | 990 | 14,013 | 60.0% | 27.8% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 6.8 | 925 | 13,184 | 50.0% | 21.4% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 7.3 | 1,146 | 11,186 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 7.0 | 985 | 12,823 | 46.1% | 54.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.3 | 996 | 13,677 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 7.1 | 999 | 13,844 | 37.5% | 64.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.9 | 941 | 13,651 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.8 | 799 | 13,230 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 7.3 | 899 | 13,916 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.8 | 833 | 12,737 | 37.5% | 54.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 7.0 | 995 | 11,187 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.8 | 1,001 | 13,638 | 44.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.2 | 1,052 | 11,799 | 72.7% | 37.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,001 | 13,491 | 37.5% | 54.5% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.6 | 856 | 13,744 | 20.0% | 64.3% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.9 | 954 | 14,565 | 14.3% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.2 | 930 | 12,551 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.8 | 912 | 14,966 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 4.9 | 902 | 12,467 | 60.0% | 23.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.1 | 845 | 12,848 | 58.3% | 40.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.6 | 892 | 12,418 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.9 | 866 | 13,646 | 66.7% | 36.4% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 813 | 11,365 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.9 | 762 | 11,754 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,108 | 12,175 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.4 | 992 | 14,578 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 999 | 16,825 | 50.0% | 12.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 842 | 13,507 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.7 | 836 | 12,066 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.6 | 911 | 13,089 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 1,214 | 12,497 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 631 | 9,550 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 757 | 14,281 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.2 | 1,051 | 14,556 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.9 | 819 | 11,685 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.3 | 1,058 | 15,271 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 812 | 10,825 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.1 | 791 | 15,289 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.8 | 1,128 | 13,055 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 719 | 10,403 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 1,073 | 10,418 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 840 | 14,215 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 887 | 11,217 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 672 | 10,265 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 1,147 | 13,117 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Syndra wins the Syndra vs Nilah matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to Nilah's 37.5%, a 25.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 8 recent ranked games in patch 26.16.
In the early game, Nilah has the advantage against Syndra with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Nilah players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Syndra takes over the Syndra vs Nilah matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to 20.0%. Syndra scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Syndra wins the matchup against Nilah with a 62.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.16. The 25.0 percentage point advantage means Syndra is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 8 games analyzed.
The best Syndra build against Nilah includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Syndra runes against Nilah use the Inspiration primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Syndra vs Nilah matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Yes, Syndra has a favorable matchup against Nilah with a 62.5% win rate. Syndra strongly counters Nilah in lane based on current patch 26.16 data.
When playing Syndra against Nilah, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Nilah. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.