- Win Rate
- 48.5%
- Pick Rate
- 1.2%
- Ban Rate
- 0.8%
Ziggs vs Aphelios
- Patch
- 26.22
- Games
- 2,340
- Lane
- All Lanes
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Last Updated
- Nov 14, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Ziggs vs Aphelios (Bot): Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 ranked games over the last 2 patches (gold diff at 15: +140). Patch 26.22 build & runes.
Ziggs52.4%
Current data slightly favors Ziggs, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 games (95% range 42.9–61.8%).
Ziggs Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ziggs performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who wins Ziggs vs Aphelios?
Ziggs wins 52.4% of these games. With this many games the true rate is most likely between 42.9% and 61.8% (95% range).
- Expected
- 48.2% From both champions' overall Bot win rates
- Matchup effect
- +4.2 pts Observed minus expected
- Sample
- 103 games Lane: Bot · Patch 26.21–26.22
- vs patch 26.21
- — Not enough games on both patches
Lane: Bot · Ranked Solo/Duo & Flex · North America server · All ranks · Patch 26.21–26.22 · Oct 27 – Nov 14
The headline win rate covers patches 26.21–26.22 (103 games). The lane, game-length, build and rune sections below use patch 26.22 only (54 games).
Key takeaways
- Current data slightly favors Ziggs, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 games (95% range 42.9–61.8%).
- Both champions' overall Bot win rates predict 48.2% for Ziggs; the result is within the margin of error of that, so this matchup mostly reflects the two champions' general strength.
- Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 140, within the margin of error (54 games).
- Ziggs players pick Health Scaling (defense) much less often against Aphelios: 78.6% of their other Bot games, 63.0% here.
How we calculate this
Games: ranked Solo/Duo and Flex games on the North America server from the patch shown. Remakes (games under 5 minutes) are excluded.
A game only counts when Ziggs and Aphelios played the same position on opposite teams, so roaming, lane swaps within a team or a champion merely being in the same game never count as this matchup.
The 95% range is a Wilson score interval. Confidence comes from how wide that range is: within ±3 points is very high, ±5 high, ±8 moderate, anything wider low. Below 20 games a matchup is not classified at all.
Expected win rate combines both champions’ win rates in this lane (same games and filters) with the log5 formula: E = A(1−B) / (A(1−B) + B(1−A)). Matchup effect = observed − expected.
"What changes" compares Ziggs's choices in this matchup with the same champion's other games in the same lane, and lists a change only when it is at least 3 points and statistically significant (two-proportion z-test, |z| ≥ 2, 20+ games).
Results are not split by rank: the sample per rank is too small for honest per-rank matchup numbers.
Ziggs vs Aphelios Laning Stats
At 15 minutes
Whole-game averages
Ziggs vs Aphelios Win Rate by Game Length
Ziggs's win rate against Aphelios by game length. The dot is the win rate, the bar its 95% range and the dashed line the champion's usual win rate at that length. Lengths with fewer than 25 games are left blank.
No game length stands out: Ziggs's results against Aphelios in short and long games are within the margin of error of each other.
Ziggs vs Aphelios Power Spikes
Who is ahead at each stage, measured from these games. A stage reads "Even" when the difference is inside the margin of error, and "Insufficient data" when there are too few games to tell.
- Lane (15 min)EvenZiggs gold at 15: +140
- First itemInsufficient data
- Games under 20 minInsufficient data
- 20–30 min gamesInsufficient data
- 30+ min gamesInsufficient data
What Ziggs Changes Against Aphelios
Choices Ziggs players make noticeably more or less often in this matchup than in their other Bot games.
Health Scaling (defense)Stat shardUsually78.6%vs Aphelios63.0%−15.6 pts47.1% WR here- Health (defense)Stat shardUsually20.4%vs Aphelios35.2%+14.8 pts
Cosmic InsightRuneUsually17.7%vs Aphelios31.5%+13.8 pts
Biscuit DeliveryRuneUsually26.4%vs Aphelios13.0%−13.4 pts
Sorcerer's ShoesBootsUsually87.1%vs Aphelios96.3%+9.2 pts51.9% WR here
TranscendenceRuneUsually93.8%vs Aphelios85.2%−8.6 pts45.7% WR here
Banshee's VeilItemUsually2.2%vs Aphelios7.4%+5.2 pts
Best Ziggs Build vs Aphelios
Usual Ziggs build (Bot)
58.1% win rate · 186 games
Against Aphelios
Not enough matchup-specific build data: only 8 of 38 Ziggs games against Aphelios carried a complete build, which is too few to recommend an item path from. Use Ziggs's standard build instead.
- Ziggs usually completes Luden's Echo first, at 10.6 min (median of 38 games).
- Skill priority: Q > E > W — the same as usual.
Builds are ranked by the lower edge of their win rate range, not the raw win rate, so a build seen in a handful of wins never outranks a proven one.
Best Ziggs Runes vs Aphelios
Usual Ziggs runes (Bot)
Arcane Comet
48.9% win rate · 425 games
Against Aphelios
Too few games for a matchup-specific rune page yet — use the usual page.
Plan your Ziggs draft in Draft Lab
Draft Lab lays out both teams lane by lane with live matchup win rates, damage profiles and game-phase lean, and suggests picks and bans from current meta data.
- Full 5v5 draft board
- Lane matchup win rates
- Pick and ban suggestions
Ziggs matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.22. The table below shows Ziggs's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ziggs build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Other Ziggs Matchups
Hardest for Ziggs
Easiest for Ziggs
Win rate and games for each matchup. Lists are ranked by the edge of the 95% range so small samples cannot top them; matchups with at least 50 games only.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ziggs vs Aphelios FAQ - Patch 26.21–26.22
Who wins Ziggs vs Aphelios?
Current data slightly favors Ziggs, but the sample is too limited for a strong conclusion: Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 games (95% range 42.9–61.8%).
What is Ziggs's win rate against Aphelios?
Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 Bot games against Aphelios on patch 26.21–26.22 (95% range 42.9–61.8%). Based on both champions' overall Bot win rates, 48.2% would be expected.
Does Ziggs counter Aphelios?
Not clearly. Ziggs wins 52.4% of 103 games against Aphelios, and the 95% range (42.9–61.8%) includes 50%, so neither champion reliably counters the other on current data.
Who wins lane, Ziggs or Aphelios?
Neither side reliably wins the lane: the average gold difference at 15 minutes is 140, within the margin of error (54 games).
Does Ziggs outscale Aphelios?
There are too few games of each length to tell yet.
When is Aphelios strongest against Ziggs?
On current data there is no stage of the game where Aphelios is ahead of Ziggs beyond the margin of error.
What should Ziggs build against Aphelios?
There are not enough games for a matchup-specific core, so use Ziggs's usual Bot core: Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Rabadon's Deathcap. The biggest change against Aphelios: Sorcerer's Shoes (87.1% usually, 96.3% here).
What runes should Ziggs use against Aphelios?
Use Ziggs's usual Arcane Comet page (Sorcery + Precision); there are too few games for a matchup-specific page. The biggest change against Aphelios: Health Scaling (defense) (78.6% usually, 63.0% here).