Iso vs Raze matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
44.4%
Matches
9
KDA
1.17
ADR
144

Iso vs RazeMatchups

Duelist
Patch12.09
Matches430,302
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedMay 19, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Iso vs Raze matchup guide: Raze leads with a 55.6% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 9-match dataset into ranked wins.

Iso Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Raze - 44.4% win rateRaze(44.4%)
Iso - 44.4% win rate in this matchup
Iso
44.4% WR
VS
Raze vs Iso matchup - 55.6% win rate
Raze
55.6% WR

Who Wins the Iso vs Raze Matchup?

Raze wins the Iso vs Raze matchup
Winner
Raze
Matches: 9
44.4%
Win Rate
55.6%
1.17
Avg KDA
1.65
15.9
Avg Kills
21.1
17.9
Avg Deaths
15.4
144.5
DMG/Round
182.3
29.4%
HS %
24.5%
209
Combat Score
270
48.6%
Attack WR
50.0%
50.0%
Defense WR
51.4%

Iso vs Raze Performance Breakdown

Iso vs Raze matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Iso vs Raze matchup, Raze demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 9 analyzed matches, Raze outperforms Iso in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Raze the statistically favored pick when facing Iso in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.17Iso
1.65Raze
Raze maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.65 KDA versus Iso's 1.17. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Raze players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
144.5Iso
182.3Raze
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (182.3 ADR) compared to Iso's 144.5 ADR. This 37.8 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
48.6%Iso
50.0%Raze
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Iso at 48.6% and Raze at 50.0% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.0%Iso
51.4%Raze
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Iso posting a 50.0% win rate and Raze at 51.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Iso vs Raze Matchup Summary

The Iso vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 9 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 55.6% of the time compared to Iso's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Raze consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Raze has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Raze and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Iso vs Raze Fragging Analysis

Raze wins fragging stats against Iso in Valorant

Raze claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Iso vs Raze matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 9 ranked games reveals Raze consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Raze in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Raze dominates.

Avg KDA
1.17Iso
1.65Raze
Raze demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Iso, maintaining a 1.65 KDA versus 1.17. This 0.49 point gap reflects Raze's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Iso players facing Raze should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Raze's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.9Iso
21.1Raze
The kill differential between Raze and Iso is dramatic: 21.1 versus 15.9, representing 5.2 additional kills per game for Raze. This massive gap shows Raze consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Iso players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Raze requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Raze's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
17.9Iso
15.4Raze
The death disparity between Raze and Iso is stark: 15.4 versus 17.9 deaths per game. Iso dies 2.4 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Iso either takes unfavorable fights against Raze or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Iso players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Raze.
DMG/Round
144.5Iso
182.3Raze
The damage differential between Raze and Iso is exceptional: 182.3 ADR compared to just 144.5. Raze deals 37.8 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Iso struggles to even trade effectively. Iso players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
29.4%Iso
24.5%Raze
Iso demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Raze: 29.4% versus 24.5%. This 4.9 percentage point gap in precision means Iso ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Raze faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Iso vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Raze
Iso48.6%
Raze50.0%
Defense Side
Raze
Iso50.0%
Raze51.4%

Attack Side Breakdown

Raze demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Iso in this matchup, converting 50.0% of attacking rounds versus 48.6%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Raze slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 9 competitive games suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Iso teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.

When taking entry duels, Raze holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Iso players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Raze's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Iso should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Raze shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Iso, winning 51.4% of defense rounds compared to 50.0%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Iso players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Raze can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Iso should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Raze demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Raze converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Iso should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Raze when you can wait for teammates. Raze can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Iso should be more conservative with eco aggression against Raze and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 50.0% attack win rate and 51.4% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Iso remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Iso vs Raze specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Iso and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Iso is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Iso, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics

Both Iso and Raze fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Raze is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.

In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Raze's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Iso has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Veto with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Viper at 27.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.09)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
40.74%811.28152.431.7%50.4%46.4%
35.53%761.22143.631.4%48.1%46.1%
46.27%671.23146.130.5%50.4%46.7%
46.55%581.20142.831.2%46.9%50.3%
54.55%331.21144.931.2%51.8%45.8%
56.25%321.28143.531.4%55.1%47.7%
48.39%311.40162.531.1%49.1%48.7%
45.16%311.34157.832.9%49.2%49.0%
44.00%251.18137.534.1%47.1%49.2%
75.00%121.35142.830.8%60.0%52.8%
45.45%111.05128.930.5%39.8%50.4%
27.27%111.27147.531.9%45.5%42.5%
70.00%101.44175.332.6%49.1%55.3%
50.00%101.17135.523.3%54.1%46.5%
44.44%91.17144.529.4%48.6%50.0%
50.00%81.30143.327.9%43.2%53.4%
62.50%81.25150.530.9%53.4%49.4%
28.57%71.31152.724.9%50.0%41.0%
50.00%60.82103.230.9%61.4%38.1%
66.67%61.21153.441.5%66.0%44.8%
80.00%51.22141.234.9%71.7%45.8%
80.00%51.83180.825.6%51.1%67.8%
50.00%41.20140.724.2%51.1%45.8%

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iso's best matchup in Valorant?

Iso's best matchup is against Veto, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Iso's hardest matchup?

Iso's hardest matchup is against Viper, with only a 27.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Iso have?

Iso has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?

When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists