Eternal Pact TFT item icon
Avg Place
4.34
1st Place
12.97%
Top 4 Rate
52.40%
Pick Rate
0.58%

Eternal PactTFT Team Comps

Set 17
SetSet 17
Matches82,208
TierAll Tiers
RankAll Ranks
Last UpdatedJul 17, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Team compositions using Eternal Pact in TFT Set 16.13. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.

Metabot Logo
MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Eternal Pact as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 52 viable team comps currently building Eternal Pact, with an average win rate of 50.41% across all compositions. The highest performing Eternal Pact comp achieves a 96.19% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Eternal Pact is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.

1.79
96.19%
58.10%
Low Contested Risk
2.17
94.19%
38.06%
Low Contested Risk
2.17
89.92%
49.19%
Low Contested Risk
2.48
88.34%
33.33%
Low Contested Risk
2.99
79.63%
24.29%
Low Contested Risk
3.08
77.75%
25.78%
Low Contested Risk
3.29
75.60%
16.72%
Low Contested Risk
3.45
74.79%
14.00%
Low Contested Risk
3.30
74.12%
21.25%
Low Contested Risk
3.43
72.41%
18.10%
Low Contested Risk
3.54
72.38%
11.13%
Low Contested Risk
3.44
70.04%
21.10%
Low Contested Risk
3.52
69.21%
16.85%
Low Contested Risk
3.70
67.45%
14.12%
Low Contested Risk
3.61
66.67%
17.59%
Low Contested Risk
3.85
65.96%
14.18%
Low Contested Risk
3.85
65.53%
12.77%
Low Contested Risk
3.72
65.13%
16.28%
Low Contested Risk
3.93
64.72%
4.53%
Low Contested Risk
3.79
64.13%
18.80%
Low Contested Risk
4.12
59.80%
10.20%
Low Contested Risk
3.91
59.69%
15.31%
Low Contested Risk
4.03
58.54%
14.78%
Low Contested Risk
4.21
56.74%
10.70%
Low Contested Risk
4.48
50.67%
7.11%
Low Contested Risk
4.61
50.48%
4.65%
Low Contested Risk
4.43
47.81%
11.68%
Low Contested Risk
4.66
46.83%
7.92%
Low Contested Risk
4.67
46.58%
3.91%
Low Contested Risk
4.99
40.25%
5.34%
Low Contested Risk
4.99
40.24%
4.74%
Low Contested Risk
4.99
38.89%
5.93%
Low Contested Risk
4.97
38.34%
3.99%
Low Contested Risk
5.03
37.32%
3.99%
Low Contested Risk
5.14
36.75%
4.10%
Low Contested Risk
5.12
36.20%
5.10%
Low Contested Risk
-
5.11
36.10%
4.16%
Low Contested Risk
5.19
34.03%
3.03%
Low Contested Risk
5.29
32.74%
1.77%
Low Contested Risk
5.42
29.63%
0.93%
Low Contested Risk
5.60
27.85%
1.83%
Low Contested Risk
5.64
26.04%
2.96%
Low Contested Risk
5.51
24.09%
0.91%
Low Contested Risk
5.74
23.70%
1.61%
Low Contested Risk
5.86
22.90%
2.26%
Low Contested Risk
5.87
21.50%
1.68%
Low Contested Risk
5.84
21.42%
3.13%
Low Contested Risk
5.88
21.41%
1.26%
Low Contested Risk
6.01
19.35%
2.91%
Low Contested Risk
5.96
18.36%
0.98%
Low Contested Risk
6.40
11.85%
0.74%
Low Contested Risk
6.42
11.04%
0.00%
Low Contested Risk
2.48
Avg Place
88.34%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
2.99
Avg Place
79.63%
Top 4 Rate
24.29%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.08
Avg Place
77.75%
Top 4 Rate
25.78%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.29
Avg Place
75.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.72%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.45
Avg Place
74.79%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.30
Avg Place
74.12%
Top 4 Rate
21.25%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.43
Avg Place
72.41%
Top 4 Rate
18.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.54
Avg Place
72.38%
Top 4 Rate
11.13%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.44
Avg Place
70.04%
Top 4 Rate
21.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.52
Avg Place
69.21%
Top 4 Rate
16.85%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.70
Avg Place
67.45%
Top 4 Rate
14.12%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.85
Avg Place
65.96%
Top 4 Rate
14.18%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.72
Avg Place
65.13%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.93
Avg Place
64.72%
Top 4 Rate
4.53%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.79
Avg Place
64.13%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.12
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
10.20%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
3.91
Avg Place
59.69%
Top 4 Rate
15.31%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.21
Avg Place
56.74%
Top 4 Rate
10.70%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.48
Avg Place
50.67%
Top 4 Rate
7.11%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.61
Avg Place
50.48%
Top 4 Rate
4.65%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.43
Avg Place
47.81%
Top 4 Rate
11.68%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.66
Avg Place
46.83%
Top 4 Rate
7.92%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.67
Avg Place
46.58%
Top 4 Rate
3.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.99
Avg Place
40.24%
Top 4 Rate
4.74%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
4.99
Avg Place
38.89%
Top 4 Rate
5.93%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.03
Avg Place
37.32%
Top 4 Rate
3.99%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.14
Avg Place
36.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.10%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.11
Avg Place
36.10%
Top 4 Rate
4.16%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.19
Avg Place
34.03%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.29
Avg Place
32.74%
Top 4 Rate
1.77%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.42
Avg Place
29.63%
Top 4 Rate
0.93%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.60
Avg Place
27.85%
Top 4 Rate
1.83%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.51
Avg Place
24.09%
Top 4 Rate
0.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
5.87
Avg Place
21.50%
Top 4 Rate
1.68%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
6.01
Avg Place
19.35%
Top 4 Rate
2.91%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View
6.42
Avg Place
11.04%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Low Contested Risk
View

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Eternal Pact Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best team comp for Eternal Pact in TFT Set 17?

The best team comp featuring Eternal Pact in TFT Set 17 achieves a 96.19% win rate with a 0.06% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Divine Duelist traits and is picked in 0.06% of games featuring Eternal Pact.

How many team comps use Eternal Pact in TFT?

There are 52 viable team compositions that commonly build Eternal Pact in TFT Set 17. Eternal Pact appears in comps with an average win rate of 50.41% across 45,276 total matches analyzed.

Which comp uses Eternal Pact most often in TFT?

The most popular comp for Eternal Pact in TFT Set 17 uses the Challenger, N.O.V.A., and Brawler traits with a 3.08% pick rate. This composition achieves a 72.38% win rate and average placement of 3.54.

What traits work well with Eternal Pact in TFT?

The best traits that synergize with Eternal Pact in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Divine Duelist, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Eternal Pact team compositions.