Aniviavs Heimerdinger
Anivia vs Heimerdinger is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Anivia wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Heimerdinger based on 20 games. Anivia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Heimerdinger Matchup?
Anivia vs Heimerdinger Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 20 recent matches analyzed, Anivia wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Heimerdinger's 40.0%, giving Anivia a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Anivia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Heimerdinger players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Anivia leads by 326 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Anivia players can confidently pick into Heimerdinger and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Heimerdinger away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Heimerdinger Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Heimerdinger, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Heimerdinger
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Heimerdinger, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Heimerdinger are Rod of Ages, Force of Nature and Fimbulwinter. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Heimerdinger. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia50.0%
Heimerdinger50.0%Anivia70.0%Heimerdinger30.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Anivia and Heimerdinger, with Anivia holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Anivia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 70.0% win rate — 40.0 points above Heimerdinger. Extended games heavily favor Anivia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Anivia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Heimerdinger players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Anivia Runes Against Heimerdinger
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Anivia to press their advantage against Heimerdinger, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.09% | 131 | 6.5 | 723 | 10,995 | 44.6% | 51.5% | |
| 47.29% | 129 | 6.8 | 682 | 11,632 | 47.1% | 47.4% | |
| 42.24% | 116 | 6.4 | 780 | 10,447 | 45.3% | 39.7% | |
| 48.08% | 104 | 4.7 | 667 | 11,306 | 52.4% | 45.2% | |
| 45.63% | 103 | 6.6 | 661 | 10,998 | 44.7% | 46.4% | |
| 50.49% | 103 | 6.7 | 717 | 10,883 | 54.5% | 47.5% | |
| 50.54% | 93 | 6.2 | 696 | 11,345 | 52.9% | 49.1% | |
| 55.91% | 93 | 6.6 | 716 | 11,372 | 58.5% | 53.9% | |
| 51.69% | 89 | 6.5 | 769 | 11,126 | 50.0% | 52.7% | |
| 57.95% | 88 | 6.4 | 836 | 11,548 | 65.6% | 53.6% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 6.4 | 754 | 11,698 | 46.9% | 42.5% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 6.7 | 873 | 10,795 | 56.3% | 46.5% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.6 | 772 | 11,599 | 44.0% | 43.9% | |
| 43.94% | 66 | 6.4 | 680 | 11,107 | 61.5% | 32.5% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 4.6 | 715 | 11,647 | 30.0% | 48.8% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 2.5 | 532 | 9,702 | 48.0% | 48.6% | |
| 58.33% | 60 | 5.8 | 781 | 12,113 | 63.6% | 55.3% | |
| 35.59% | 59 | 6.3 | 693 | 11,397 | 35.0% | 35.9% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.6 | 809 | 12,023 | 60.0% | 47.2% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 6.7 | 697 | 10,464 | 51.9% | 46.4% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 6.6 | 750 | 10,785 | 50.0% | 43.3% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.4 | 639 | 10,372 | 57.1% | 51.6% | |
| 62.75% | 51 | 6.9 | 786 | 11,210 | 54.2% | 70.4% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.3 | 721 | 11,128 | 43.5% | 44.4% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 6.5 | 804 | 10,687 | 47.8% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 6.9 | 760 | 11,186 | 36.8% | 59.3% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.3 | 640 | 10,172 | 56.5% | 45.5% | |
| 34.09% | 44 | 6.6 | 715 | 10,943 | 45.0% | 25.0% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 2.3 | 575 | 10,093 | 42.1% | 68.0% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 6.6 | 673 | 10,899 | 56.3% | 60.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 6.4 | 731 | 10,566 | 41.2% | 54.5% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 6.4 | 811 | 11,943 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 6.5 | 717 | 10,241 | 52.6% | 31.6% | |
| 41.67% | 37 | 1.9 | 671 | 10,501 | 50.0% | 35.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.3 | 733 | 10,951 | 58.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 2.3 | 573 | 9,249 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 3.0 | 611 | 10,241 | 53.9% | 40.9% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.9 | 510 | 9,107 | 50.0% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 7.1 | 999 | 12,183 | 72.7% | 52.2% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.7 | 746 | 10,493 | 58.8% | 47.1% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.2 | 705 | 10,967 | 41.2% | 37.5% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 7.0 | 776 | 12,198 | 45.5% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.6 | 830 | 12,962 | 62.5% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 4.9 | 654 | 10,498 | 62.5% | 37.5% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 6.8 | 698 | 10,637 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 7.1 | 877 | 11,416 | 56.3% | 40.0% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 3.4 | 635 | 11,010 | 80.0% | 47.6% | |
| 73.33% | 30 | 6.3 | 736 | 11,611 | 70.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,693 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.5 | 833 | 11,150 | 58.3% | 47.1% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.3 | 920 | 11,431 | 33.3% | 52.6% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 6.7 | 743 | 10,901 | 62.5% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.4 | 814 | 11,587 | 77.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 6.0 | 643 | 10,476 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.7 | 773 | 12,044 | 60.0% | 56.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 3.3 | 774 | 10,752 | 57.1% | 52.6% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.4 | 486 | 9,675 | 44.4% | 29.4% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.2 | 793 | 9,975 | 46.1% | 53.9% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 2.6 | 641 | 9,679 | 27.3% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 6.9 | 810 | 11,110 | 36.4% | 42.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 934 | 12,559 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.3 | 801 | 10,793 | 70.0% | 35.7% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.6 | 738 | 10,886 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.4 | 804 | 13,501 | 50.0% | 43.8% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.8 | 624 | 10,303 | 75.0% | 53.3% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.6 | 789 | 13,033 | 60.0% | 30.8% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 6.5 | 758 | 11,618 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.8 | 751 | 10,753 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.9 | 512 | 9,059 | 63.6% | 60.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.5 | 799 | 10,973 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.7 | 813 | 12,536 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.1 | 677 | 11,432 | 90.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 746 | 10,980 | 75.0% | 41.7% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 557 | 9,775 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.9 | 623 | 10,621 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.8 | 781 | 11,993 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.4 | 637 | 11,717 | 55.6% | 30.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 3.6 | 590 | 8,667 | 54.5% | 75.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.1 | 730 | 12,028 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.1 | 646 | 9,504 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.7 | 881 | 10,930 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 6.6 | 735 | 10,947 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.2 | 735 | 11,986 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.1 | 704 | 10,615 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 7.2 | 900 | 14,213 | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.2 | 650 | 11,092 | 25.0% | 61.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 468 | 8,136 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.6 | 852 | 11,724 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.3 | 603 | 9,581 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.5 | 661 | 10,587 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.2 | 681 | 11,082 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.9 | 789 | 12,428 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.7 | 676 | 9,787 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.5 | 597 | 9,269 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.0 | 426 | 9,629 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.2 | 631 | 9,552 | 83.3% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 7.0 | 748 | 11,734 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.7 | 680 | 10,312 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.8 | 699 | 9,653 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 5.9 | 736 | 9,904 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.2 | 595 | 8,354 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.5 | 795 | 12,114 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.8 | 697 | 10,341 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.6 | 502 | 8,744 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.6 | 643 | 9,156 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 722 | 11,376 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 7.8 | 1,185 | 13,175 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.9 | 532 | 10,071 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.8 | 623 | 10,400 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 719 | 11,687 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.3 | 656 | 11,756 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.2 | 676 | 12,228 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 606 | 9,073 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 596 | 11,601 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.6 | 633 | 10,548 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 668 | 12,096 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 758 | 10,448 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.6 | 937 | 12,475 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.4 | 660 | 8,989 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.5 | 1,101 | 13,357 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 641 | 10,654 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 850 | 9,437 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 532 | 7,985 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 698 | 10,649 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 827 | 10,880 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 785 | 16,861 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 725 | 11,034 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 519 | 7,864 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 787 | 13,449 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 850 | 14,489 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 786 | 8,576 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 714 | 13,541 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Heimerdinger - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Heimerdinger in League of Legends?
Anivia wins the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Heimerdinger's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 20 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Anivia do against Heimerdinger in the early game?
In the early game, Anivia has the advantage against Heimerdinger with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Anivia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Heimerdinger in the late game?
In the late game, Anivia takes over the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup with a 70.0% win rate compared to 30.0%. Anivia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup?
Anivia wins the matchup against Heimerdinger with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Anivia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 20 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Heimerdinger?
The best Anivia build against Heimerdinger includes Rod of Ages, Force of Nature, Fimbulwinter with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Heimerdinger?
The best Anivia runes against Heimerdinger use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Heimerdinger matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Heimerdinger?
Yes, Anivia has a favorable matchup against Heimerdinger with a 60.0% win rate. Anivia strongly counters Heimerdinger in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Anivia against Heimerdinger?
When playing Anivia against Heimerdinger, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.