Aniviavs Neeko
Anivia vs Neeko is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Anivia wins with a 55.6% win rate (+11.1%) over Neeko based on 9 games. Neeko wins the early laning phase while Anivia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Neeko matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Neeko Matchup?
Anivia vs Neeko Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Neeko matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Anivia wins with a 55.6% win rate compared to Neeko's 44.4%, giving Anivia a 11.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Neeko controls the early laning stage, but Anivia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Neeko needs to press advantages before Anivia reaches their power spikes, while Anivia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Anivia leads by 224 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Anivia players can confidently pick into Neeko and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Neeko away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Neeko Laning Phase Breakdown
Anivia is favored during the laning phase against Neeko, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Anivia holds advantages in gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Neeko
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Neeko, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Neeko are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Neeko. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Neeko matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia33.3%
Neeko66.7%Anivia66.7%Neeko33.3%Neeko dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Anivia. This lopsided early game means Neeko can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Anivia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Neeko. Extended games heavily favor Anivia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Neeko must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Anivia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Anivia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Anivia Runes Against Neeko
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Anivia to press their advantage against Neeko, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.88% | 104 | 6.9 | 714 | 11,691 | 44.0% | 61.1% | |
| 52.81% | 89 | 6.7 | 785 | 10,931 | 55.8% | 48.6% | |
| 42.05% | 88 | 6.7 | 740 | 11,126 | 47.4% | 38.0% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 5.2 | 658 | 10,925 | 33.3% | 58.0% | |
| 44.05% | 84 | 6.4 | 799 | 11,262 | 41.7% | 45.8% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 6.8 | 695 | 10,948 | 58.1% | 47.4% | |
| 53.62% | 69 | 6.7 | 724 | 11,663 | 53.3% | 53.9% | |
| 38.71% | 62 | 6.4 | 850 | 11,891 | 47.8% | 33.3% | |
| 43.55% | 62 | 6.0 | 687 | 10,825 | 43.8% | 43.3% | |
| 44.26% | 61 | 6.6 | 726 | 11,463 | 40.0% | 47.2% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 6.4 | 719 | 10,859 | 42.3% | 50.0% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 6.2 | 677 | 10,154 | 51.4% | 45.0% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 6.3 | 709 | 11,613 | 52.6% | 56.7% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 6.2 | 645 | 10,978 | 42.1% | 55.2% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 6.7 | 709 | 12,003 | 53.9% | 62.9% | |
| 68.18% | 44 | 6.0 | 869 | 10,838 | 73.9% | 61.9% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 6.5 | 731 | 11,462 | 43.8% | 59.3% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 6.8 | 749 | 12,140 | 42.9% | 37.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 6.7 | 772 | 12,006 | 58.8% | 47.8% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.6 | 546 | 10,098 | 47.4% | 52.4% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 5.9 | 773 | 11,314 | 41.7% | 52.0% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 6.7 | 871 | 11,736 | 56.3% | 40.0% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 4.8 | 687 | 11,971 | 58.3% | 62.5% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 1.9 | 545 | 8,832 | 36.4% | 41.7% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 3.3 | 633 | 10,982 | 41.7% | 36.4% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 5.9 | 709 | 10,685 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 6.2 | 758 | 10,944 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 6.3 | 797 | 10,537 | 60.0% | 41.2% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 828 | 10,735 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 4.0 | 819 | 10,787 | 38.5% | 44.4% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 6.8 | 782 | 12,064 | 46.1% | 38.9% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 6.6 | 761 | 9,647 | 35.3% | 42.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.1 | 624 | 9,305 | 45.5% | 47.4% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 7.0 | 727 | 10,783 | 35.7% | 53.3% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 5.7 | 640 | 10,800 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.6 | 767 | 12,350 | 66.7% | 36.8% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 6.3 | 694 | 10,366 | 33.3% | 38.5% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 2.5 | 578 | 9,386 | 36.4% | 46.7% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 6.6 | 703 | 9,616 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.5 | 749 | 9,379 | 56.3% | 55.6% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 2.4 | 605 | 10,005 | 37.5% | 43.8% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,389 | 33.3% | 73.3% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.4 | 613 | 8,484 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.1 | 768 | 11,502 | 63.6% | 38.5% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 7.3 | 695 | 9,816 | 64.3% | 60.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.5 | 656 | 10,528 | 30.8% | 54.5% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 6.5 | 839 | 12,714 | 25.0% | 42.1% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.2 | 692 | 11,493 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 5.3 | 688 | 10,291 | 22.2% | 38.5% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 2.1 | 563 | 7,853 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.3 | 867 | 10,864 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 697 | 9,349 | 37.5% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 20 | 7.0 | 762 | 10,607 | 90.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 7.1 | 706 | 11,281 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 758 | 11,194 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.8 | 796 | 10,683 | 28.6% | 41.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.8 | 778 | 11,672 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.3 | 844 | 12,586 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 4.0 | 878 | 11,306 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 6.9 | 727 | 12,394 | 12.5% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 7.5 | 719 | 9,026 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.2 | 893 | 10,012 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.8 | 742 | 11,720 | 60.0% | 63.6% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 7.0 | 784 | 12,226 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 2.8 | 524 | 10,309 | 0.0% | 36.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.2 | 460 | 10,333 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.9 | 547 | 9,230 | 55.6% | 100.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 833 | 11,378 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.5 | 952 | 11,021 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.6 | 740 | 11,875 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 7.4 | 780 | 11,125 | 55.6% | 80.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.3 | 745 | 10,285 | 57.1% | 14.3% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 610 | 8,787 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 7.2 | 779 | 11,060 | 28.6% | 28.6% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.0 | 489 | 9,700 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.6 | 1,069 | 10,688 | 42.9% | 83.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.9 | 527 | 8,756 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.5 | 846 | 11,985 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.7 | 459 | 8,574 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 2.1 | 531 | 9,817 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.9 | 798 | 12,126 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.0 | 852 | 11,015 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.6 | 898 | 11,499 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 752 | 12,882 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 722 | 13,026 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 3.1 | 456 | 9,999 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 455 | 7,653 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 828 | 13,202 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 729 | 12,283 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 713 | 10,848 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.0 | 717 | 12,353 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.2 | 751 | 10,022 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.5 | 767 | 13,098 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.0 | 794 | 11,629 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 6.7 | 729 | 12,355 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.3 | 796 | 11,154 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 744 | 11,581 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 679 | 12,488 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 549 | 8,288 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 658 | 10,975 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.7 | 457 | 7,570 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 553 | 9,250 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 586 | 10,292 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 636 | 10,670 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.9 | 665 | 10,578 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.6 | 574 | 8,965 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.5 | 851 | 9,217 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 673 | 10,376 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.6 | 742 | 12,587 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.3 | 705 | 10,685 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 630 | 8,704 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.7 | 716 | 8,392 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 746 | 11,601 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 689 | 8,266 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 649 | 12,607 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 477 | 8,042 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.6 | 681 | 10,236 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 658 | 8,540 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 583 | 9,083 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 738 | 14,716 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 585 | 11,890 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 671 | 11,760 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Neeko - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Neeko in League of Legends?
Anivia wins the Anivia vs Neeko matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to Neeko's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Anivia do against Neeko in the early game?
In the early game, Neeko has the advantage against Anivia with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Neeko players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Neeko in the late game?
In the late game, Anivia takes over the Anivia vs Neeko matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Anivia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Neeko matchup?
Anivia wins the matchup against Neeko with a 55.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 11.1 percentage point advantage means Anivia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Neeko?
The best Anivia build against Neeko includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Seraph's Embrace with Crimson Lucidity. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Neeko?
The best Anivia runes against Neeko use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Neeko matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Neeko?
Yes, Anivia has a favorable matchup against Neeko with a 55.6% win rate. Anivia strongly counters Neeko in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Anivia against Neeko?
When playing Anivia against Neeko, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Neeko. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.