
Aniviavs Ziggs
Anivia vs Ziggs is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Ziggs wins with a 64.7% win rate (+29.4%) over Anivia based on 17 games. Ziggs holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Anivia vs Ziggs Matchup?

Anivia vs Ziggs Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Ziggs matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 17 recent matches analyzed, Ziggs wins with a 64.7% win rate compared to Anivia's 35.3%, giving Ziggs a 29.4 percentage point advantage. Ziggs dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Anivia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Anivia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ziggs has a strong advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ziggs overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Ziggs Laning Phase Breakdown
Ziggs is favored during the laning phase against Anivia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ziggs holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Ziggs
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Ziggs, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Ziggs are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Ziggs. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ziggs dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 71.4% win rate — a 42.9 percentage point lead over Anivia. This lopsided early game means Ziggs can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ziggs is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Anivia. Extended games heavily favor Ziggs, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Ziggs holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Anivia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Anivia Runes Against Ziggs
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Anivia the best tools to compete against Ziggs in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.37% | 83 | 6.6 | 746 | 12,018 | 48.6% | 39.1% | |
| 38.36% | 73 | 6.7 | 750 | 11,258 | 38.7% | 38.1% | |
| 41.94% | 62 | 6.6 | 688 | 11,239 | 41.9% | 41.9% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.3 | 808 | 11,340 | 37.0% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 4.3 | 657 | 10,286 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 6.6 | 798 | 10,755 | 48.1% | 40.0% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 5.9 | 756 | 12,174 | 66.7% | 48.4% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 6.6 | 844 | 11,232 | 52.2% | 43.5% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 6.5 | 752 | 11,206 | 45.0% | 52.0% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.2 | 671 | 11,139 | 60.9% | 47.6% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 6.8 | 734 | 10,497 | 73.1% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 6.8 | 694 | 10,262 | 42.9% | 57.9% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 6.5 | 704 | 10,539 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 6.8 | 782 | 12,634 | 33.3% | 30.4% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.3 | 831 | 12,711 | 42.9% | 29.4% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.8 | 703 | 12,669 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.8 | 538 | 10,155 | 45.5% | 35.0% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 4.8 | 833 | 11,996 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.2 | 713 | 11,459 | 45.5% | 68.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.9 | 753 | 11,397 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.6 | 828 | 11,876 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.7 | 731 | 11,813 | 58.3% | 43.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.6 | 658 | 10,347 | 43.8% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 4.8 | 678 | 10,340 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.7 | 803 | 10,965 | 30.8% | 76.9% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.8 | 846 | 11,820 | 76.9% | 45.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.2 | 744 | 12,215 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.4 | 713 | 11,901 | 44.4% | 46.7% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.9 | 540 | 9,037 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.3 | 754 | 12,081 | 70.0% | 46.1% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.8 | 757 | 11,043 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.0 | 673 | 11,805 | 25.0% | 64.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.8 | 736 | 11,468 | 53.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.9 | 541 | 9,216 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 783 | 12,318 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 484 | 9,494 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 800 | 10,898 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.9 | 559 | 7,752 | 46.1% | 16.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 3.6 | 645 | 10,675 | 75.0% | 36.4% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 2.8 | 544 | 8,374 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 1.8 | 562 | 9,760 | 25.0% | 18.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.7 | 874 | 11,130 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 6.6 | 788 | 12,014 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.1 | 839 | 12,361 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 3.6 | 646 | 11,349 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.4 | 633 | 10,039 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 7.0 | 696 | 11,071 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.5 | 714 | 11,484 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 3.1 | 856 | 10,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.7 | 533 | 9,912 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.5 | 574 | 9,075 | 12.5% | 87.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 602 | 10,527 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 672 | 13,053 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.7 | 532 | 8,246 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.7 | 457 | 8,919 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.7 | 526 | 9,397 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 6.5 | 832 | 12,108 | 16.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.8 | 792 | 13,003 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.3 | 717 | 10,468 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.8 | 856 | 12,702 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 7.2 | 798 | 12,363 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 924 | 12,479 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.9 | 485 | 8,552 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 1,159 | 12,878 | 80.0% | 85.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 682 | 12,224 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 907 | 10,273 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 1,062 | 10,876 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.5 | 552 | 8,627 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.9 | 919 | 14,958 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.4 | 927 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.7 | 608 | 10,169 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 908 | 12,216 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.6 | 772 | 12,322 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 853 | 11,393 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 6.8 | 1,039 | 13,830 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 461 | 8,784 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 782 | 11,811 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 573 | 12,338 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.3 | 669 | 11,090 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 878 | 12,553 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.6 | 611 | 11,010 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 649 | 12,597 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 668 | 10,737 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.7 | 785 | 11,946 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.4 | 771 | 11,916 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,015 | 13,365 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.0 | 654 | 9,675 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.9 | 973 | 12,833 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.4 | 694 | 10,663 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.0 | 658 | 9,614 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 7.1 | 854 | 11,617 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 815 | 7,923 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 792 | 14,190 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 951 | 12,293 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 595 | 9,450 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 752 | 12,741 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 525 | 11,398 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 441 | 9,182 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 778 | 11,387 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 668 | 11,841 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 697 | 8,618 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 985 | 13,775 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 507 | 9,383 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Ziggs - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Ziggs in League of Legends?
Ziggs wins the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup with a 64.7% win rate compared to Anivia's 35.3%, a 29.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 17 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Anivia do against Ziggs in the early game?
In the early game, Ziggs has the advantage against Anivia with a 71.4% win rate versus 28.6%. Ziggs players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Ziggs in the late game?
In the late game, Ziggs takes over the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Ziggs scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup?
Ziggs wins the matchup against Anivia with a 64.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 29.4 percentage point advantage means Ziggs is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 17 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Ziggs?
The best Anivia build against Ziggs includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Ziggs?
The best Anivia runes against Ziggs use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Ziggs matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Ziggs?
No, Anivia struggles against Ziggs with only a 35.3% win rate. Ziggs has the advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ziggs's lead.
How do I play Anivia against Ziggs?
When playing Anivia against Ziggs, play cautiously and avoid Ziggs's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ziggs has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.