Aniviavs Xin Zhao
Anivia vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.9. Xin Zhao wins with a 53.9% win rate (+7.7%) over Anivia based on 13 games. Xin Zhao wins the early laning phase while Anivia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Anivia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Anivia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Xin Zhao(46.1%)Who Wins the Anivia vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Anivia vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 13 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 53.9% win rate compared to Anivia's 46.1%, giving Xin Zhao a 7.7 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Xin Zhao controls the early laning stage, but Anivia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Xin Zhao needs to press advantages before Anivia reaches their power spikes, while Anivia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Anivia leads by 1.1s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Xin Zhao has a strong advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Xin Zhao overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Anivia vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Anivia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Anivia Build Against Xin Zhao
Swiftmarch is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Anivia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Anivia against Xin Zhao are Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment and Zhonya's Hourglass. This combination gives Anivia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Anivia33.3%Xin Zhao66.7%Anivia57.1%Xin Zhao42.9%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Anivia. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Anivia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Anivia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Xin Zhao must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Anivia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Anivia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Anivia Runes Against Xin Zhao
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Anivia the best tools to compete against Xin Zhao in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Anivia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.9. The table below shows Anivia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Anivia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.45% | 83 | 6.9 | 750 | 12,073 | 70.3% | 54.4% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 6.5 | 765 | 11,650 | 53.9% | 54.0% | |
| 38.57% | 70 | 6.5 | 763 | 11,638 | 34.6% | 40.9% | |
| 45.45% | 66 | 4.6 | 633 | 9,902 | 46.7% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 58 | 6.5 | 802 | 12,140 | 47.4% | 51.3% | |
| 44.83% | 58 | 5.8 | 740 | 11,750 | 42.1% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 7.0 | 655 | 10,971 | 48.1% | 51.7% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.8 | 755 | 10,762 | 48.1% | 55.6% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.7 | 776 | 11,017 | 52.2% | 72.2% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 6.8 | 754 | 11,505 | 52.9% | 56.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.8 | 807 | 13,002 | 41.7% | 57.1% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 2.7 | 534 | 9,711 | 35.3% | 66.7% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 6.7 | 889 | 10,819 | 52.2% | 71.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.1 | 757 | 11,049 | 46.1% | 45.8% | |
| 38.89% | 36 | 5.4 | 655 | 11,227 | 35.7% | 40.9% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 6.2 | 763 | 11,552 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 6.8 | 673 | 10,679 | 53.3% | 35.0% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 7.0 | 792 | 11,666 | 41.2% | 52.9% | |
| 27.27% | 33 | 6.2 | 679 | 9,948 | 23.5% | 31.3% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.0 | 821 | 12,901 | 66.7% | 38.5% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 7.4 | 800 | 11,509 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 6.4 | 679 | 11,277 | 36.4% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.8 | 858 | 11,898 | 46.7% | 73.3% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.8 | 606 | 10,613 | 62.5% | 47.4% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 6.6 | 811 | 11,143 | 72.7% | 31.3% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.6 | 650 | 11,481 | 71.4% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 7.2 | 810 | 12,280 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 6.5 | 734 | 11,293 | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 852 | 11,030 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.9 | 646 | 8,674 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.3 | 806 | 11,543 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 3.7 | 550 | 10,326 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.6 | 810 | 11,609 | 37.5% | 64.3% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 7.0 | 639 | 11,125 | 20.0% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 4.6 | 818 | 10,457 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 3.8 | 555 | 8,957 | 45.5% | 30.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 6.2 | 751 | 10,853 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.1 | 662 | 10,001 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.1 | 650 | 9,416 | 41.7% | 55.6% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 2.2 | 602 | 9,970 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.7 | 824 | 11,757 | 75.0% | 53.9% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 7.0 | 842 | 11,232 | 70.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 633 | 10,015 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 639 | 8,071 | 58.3% | 62.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.6 | 849 | 12,184 | 63.6% | 44.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.0 | 757 | 11,515 | 57.1% | 41.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 2.2 | 591 | 9,397 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 77.78% | 18 | 6.5 | 780 | 12,247 | 80.0% | 76.9% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.5 | 766 | 11,507 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 6.4 | 728 | 10,526 | 27.3% | 28.6% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.3 | 656 | 10,623 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 4.3 | 885 | 11,799 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.3 | 695 | 11,972 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 583 | 9,287 | 30.0% | 85.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.7 | 729 | 12,132 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.5 | 574 | 10,219 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.8 | 749 | 10,689 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 7.0 | 746 | 9,659 | 63.6% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 2.2 | 614 | 10,365 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.5 | 646 | 11,448 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.7 | 892 | 12,851 | 66.7% | 72.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.6 | 595 | 9,737 | 25.0% | 30.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.9 | 732 | 11,535 | 83.3% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 949 | 12,321 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.4 | 892 | 11,286 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 7.1 | 840 | 11,041 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.2 | 915 | 10,160 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.4 | 758 | 12,221 | 71.4% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 7.7 | 714 | 12,189 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.8 | 768 | 11,157 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 748 | 11,514 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.7 | 520 | 9,368 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.7 | 475 | 8,570 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.8 | 895 | 12,239 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.0 | 896 | 10,783 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.0 | 617 | 9,600 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 948 | 12,846 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 879 | 13,814 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 502 | 7,792 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 791 | 9,541 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.4 | 748 | 10,300 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.6 | 893 | 12,402 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.5 | 814 | 11,763 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.0 | 818 | 11,493 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.7 | 559 | 11,227 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.7 | 582 | 9,663 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 924 | 12,860 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.5 | 617 | 12,216 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 525 | 9,052 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.4 | 791 | 10,206 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 661 | 11,096 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.6 | 656 | 8,863 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.3 | 486 | 7,881 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 892 | 13,715 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.1 | 596 | 10,083 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.7 | 655 | 10,300 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 763 | 11,459 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.9 | 999 | 12,114 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.2 | 922 | 10,592 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.1 | 1,186 | 12,383 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 671 | 10,385 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 877 | 12,387 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 870 | 15,025 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.0 | 692 | 11,719 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 740 | 15,981 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.2 | 733 | 10,564 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 679 | 10,420 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 850 | 12,384 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 806 | 13,723 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 819 | 9,031 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 869 | 13,489 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 477 | 10,958 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 764 | 7,395 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Anivia vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Anivia do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 53.9% win rate compared to Anivia's 46.1%, a 7.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 13 recent ranked games in patch 26.9.
How does Anivia do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Anivia with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Anivia do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Anivia takes over the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Anivia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Anivia with a 53.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.9. The 7.7 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 13 games analyzed.
What is the best Anivia build against Xin Zhao?
The best Anivia build against Xin Zhao includes Rod of Ages, Liandry's Torment, Zhonya's Hourglass with Swiftmarch. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Anivia runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Anivia runes against Xin Zhao use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Anivia vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Anivia counter Xin Zhao?
No, Anivia struggles against Xin Zhao with only a 46.1% win rate. Xin Zhao has the advantage in this matchup. Anivia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Xin Zhao's lead.
How do I play Anivia against Xin Zhao?
When playing Anivia against Xin Zhao, play cautiously and avoid Xin Zhao's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Xin Zhao in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.