Ekkovs Xin Zhao
Ekko vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Xin Zhao wins with a 56.1% win rate (+12.3%) over Ekko based on 114 games. Xin Zhao holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Ekko Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ekko performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ekko vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Ekko vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 114 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 56.1% win rate compared to Ekko's 43.9%, giving Xin Zhao a 12.3 percentage point advantage. Xin Zhao dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ekko players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 542 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Xin Zhao has a strong advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Xin Zhao overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ekko vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Ekko is favored during the laning phase against Xin Zhao, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Ekko holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ekko Build Against Xin Zhao
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Ekko needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ekko against Xin Zhao are Shadowflame, Hextech Rocketbelt and Void Staff. This combination gives Ekko an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ekko44.9%
Xin Zhao55.1%Ekko43.1%Xin Zhao56.9%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.1% win rate — a 10.2 percentage point lead over Ekko. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Xin Zhao is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 56.9% win rate — 13.8 points above Ekko. Extended games heavily favor Xin Zhao, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Xin Zhao holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ekko players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Ekko Runes Against Xin Zhao
Domination
Inspiration
The Domination and Inspiration rune setup gives Ekko the best tools to compete against Xin Zhao in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ekko matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Ekko's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ekko build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 200 | 3.0 | 743 | 12,428 | 47.4% | 52.4% | |
| 46.75% | 169 | 1.2 | 705 | 12,671 | 53.2% | 41.1% | |
| 48.75% | 160 | 1.3 | 717 | 13,317 | 50.0% | 48.0% | |
| 45.75% | 153 | 4.2 | 840 | 12,042 | 42.0% | 48.8% | |
| 52.03% | 148 | 5.8 | 852 | 12,263 | 46.3% | 56.8% | |
| 54.23% | 142 | 1.3 | 747 | 12,790 | 56.8% | 51.5% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 6.3 | 807 | 12,737 | 56.3% | 39.6% | |
| 48.92% | 139 | 6.3 | 798 | 11,315 | 52.2% | 45.8% | |
| 46.97% | 132 | 1.3 | 782 | 13,585 | 40.4% | 52.0% | |
| 43.75% | 128 | 1.2 | 776 | 13,137 | 42.4% | 44.9% | |
| 48.80% | 125 | 3.8 | 763 | 12,099 | 54.5% | 44.3% | |
| 55.20% | 125 | 5.9 | 897 | 12,126 | 65.3% | 48.7% | |
| 55.83% | 120 | 5.0 | 795 | 12,770 | 66.7% | 48.6% | |
| 51.67% | 120 | 1.4 | 736 | 12,773 | 55.6% | 48.5% | |
| 52.54% | 118 | 6.2 | 855 | 12,148 | 46.5% | 58.3% | |
| 43.86% | 114 | 2.9 | 878 | 12,905 | 44.9% | 43.1% | |
| 47.32% | 112 | 6.0 | 944 | 12,553 | 50.9% | 43.4% | |
| 50.91% | 110 | 6.3 | 899 | 12,514 | 50.0% | 51.8% | |
| 47.22% | 108 | 1.4 | 729 | 12,914 | 54.0% | 41.4% | |
| 52.94% | 102 | 1.2 | 727 | 12,528 | 50.0% | 55.4% | |
| 47.00% | 100 | 6.2 | 804 | 12,412 | 50.0% | 44.6% | |
| 43.16% | 95 | 5.9 | 782 | 12,410 | 39.4% | 45.2% | |
| 34.74% | 95 | 1.1 | 695 | 11,819 | 38.6% | 31.4% | |
| 55.17% | 87 | 5.7 | 809 | 10,999 | 52.4% | 57.8% | |
| 52.50% | 80 | 1.3 | 746 | 14,536 | 56.5% | 50.9% | |
| 53.33% | 75 | 5.8 | 825 | 12,179 | 40.7% | 60.4% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 3.4 | 818 | 13,358 | 45.8% | 46.8% | |
| 57.35% | 68 | 6.0 | 827 | 11,997 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 56.06% | 66 | 5.6 | 779 | 11,303 | 58.1% | 54.3% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.1 | 725 | 12,598 | 41.0% | 61.5% | |
| 53.97% | 63 | 6.3 | 884 | 11,102 | 54.5% | 53.3% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 1.2 | 695 | 12,850 | 41.7% | 48.7% | |
| 37.70% | 61 | 5.9 | 765 | 11,727 | 33.3% | 40.5% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.1 | 702 | 13,034 | 48.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 60 | 1.1 | 695 | 13,897 | 36.8% | 26.8% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 6.3 | 765 | 11,625 | 53.3% | 44.8% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 5.8 | 782 | 12,236 | 52.6% | 38.5% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 6.4 | 756 | 12,481 | 54.5% | 54.3% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 1.7 | 719 | 13,106 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 1.1 | 742 | 13,828 | 36.4% | 61.8% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 6.1 | 840 | 12,777 | 61.9% | 53.1% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 6.0 | 850 | 11,086 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 6.1 | 906 | 13,027 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 846 | 13,229 | 56.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.1 | 776 | 13,620 | 42.9% | 55.2% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 879 | 12,278 | 56.0% | 56.0% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 1.9 | 718 | 13,300 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 59.18% | 49 | 1.3 | 686 | 13,049 | 51.9% | 68.2% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 3.4 | 728 | 11,129 | 56.5% | 38.5% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 4.3 | 818 | 10,563 | 63.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 6.4 | 902 | 12,673 | 31.8% | 61.5% | |
| 60.00% | 45 | 6.5 | 847 | 12,435 | 61.9% | 58.3% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.5 | 910 | 13,150 | 41.2% | 52.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.3 | 756 | 10,922 | 47.1% | 63.6% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 1.2 | 712 | 13,151 | 43.8% | 30.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.2 | 759 | 12,600 | 50.0% | 63.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.5 | 780 | 13,185 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 1.3 | 774 | 12,811 | 38.9% | 52.4% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 1.1 | 639 | 12,086 | 63.2% | 31.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,662 | 70.6% | 45.0% | |
| 69.44% | 36 | 6.0 | 815 | 11,109 | 70.0% | 68.8% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 6.0 | 746 | 12,184 | 81.8% | 40.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 6.4 | 1,006 | 12,088 | 55.6% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.2 | 731 | 12,852 | 53.3% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 5.3 | 890 | 13,217 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 5.8 | 834 | 11,036 | 42.1% | 53.3% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 1.0 | 839 | 13,684 | 28.6% | 68.4% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 2.0 | 802 | 13,428 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 1.1 | 680 | 11,299 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 3.9 | 743 | 12,516 | 38.5% | 36.8% | |
| 70.97% | 31 | 5.9 | 778 | 12,621 | 60.0% | 76.2% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 4.3 | 675 | 12,146 | 36.4% | 42.1% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.1 | 833 | 12,895 | 53.9% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 5.7 | 776 | 12,120 | 44.4% | 42.1% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.8 | 749 | 12,820 | 81.8% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 4.0 | 775 | 10,906 | 46.7% | 45.5% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 3.5 | 707 | 11,504 | 30.8% | 30.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 742 | 13,069 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.2 | 867 | 10,671 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 4.4 | 945 | 12,415 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 3.1 | 743 | 13,854 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.7 | 855 | 12,231 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 688 | 11,919 | 54.5% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 824 | 11,248 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 21.05% | 19 | 6.4 | 890 | 12,040 | 0.0% | 36.4% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.1 | 907 | 11,805 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 4.9 | 935 | 11,511 | 77.8% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 726 | 12,047 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 2.9 | 818 | 11,678 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 4.6 | 763 | 12,524 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.7 | 840 | 14,133 | 0.0% | 46.1% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 834 | 11,995 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.9 | 659 | 12,079 | 55.6% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.8 | 879 | 13,395 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.5 | 796 | 12,769 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,030 | 11,979 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.6 | 647 | 10,887 | 33.3% | 87.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 780 | 14,789 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.4 | 773 | 10,294 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.0 | 871 | 12,041 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.0 | 858 | 13,759 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.1 | 733 | 13,666 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 931 | 14,229 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 738 | 14,131 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 3.2 | 908 | 14,094 | 0.0% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 845 | 14,309 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.1 | 700 | 10,947 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 838 | 13,882 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 941 | 13,815 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.9 | 754 | 11,374 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 705 | 10,587 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.9 | 1,005 | 12,434 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 873 | 13,530 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.1 | 499 | 9,352 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.7 | 1,007 | 10,947 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 794 | 11,360 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 760 | 11,197 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 652 | 12,198 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.7 | 658 | 12,753 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,186 | 16,600 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 784 | 12,145 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 921 | 17,409 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.5 | 684 | 11,148 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 746 | 13,206 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.8 | 901 | 13,329 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 628 | 8,065 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 608 | 10,319 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 693 | 12,050 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 1,114 | 12,369 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 735 | 11,280 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 723 | 11,429 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 648 | 11,569 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 854 | 15,532 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ekko vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ekko do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 56.1% win rate compared to Ekko's 43.9%, a 12.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 114 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Ekko do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Ekko with a 55.1% win rate versus 44.9%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ekko do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Xin Zhao takes over the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 56.9% win rate compared to 43.1%. Xin Zhao scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Ekko with a 56.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 12.3 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 114 games analyzed.
What is the best Ekko build against Xin Zhao?
The best Ekko build against Xin Zhao includes Shadowflame, Hextech Rocketbelt, Void Staff with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ekko runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Ekko runes against Xin Zhao use the Domination primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 52.4% win rate in the Ekko vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ekko counter Xin Zhao?
No, Ekko struggles against Xin Zhao with only a 43.9% win rate. Xin Zhao has the advantage in this matchup. Ekko players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Xin Zhao's lead.
How do I play Ekko against Xin Zhao?
When playing Ekko against Xin Zhao, play cautiously and avoid Xin Zhao's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Xin Zhao has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.