Fizzvs Ambessa
Fizz vs Ambessa is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Fizz wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Ambessa based on 16 games. Ambessa wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Ambessa Matchup?
Fizz vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Ambessa matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 16 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Ambessa's 50.0%, giving Fizz a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ambessa controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ambessa needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 779 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Ambessa's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Ambessa, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Ambessa
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Ambessa are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Void Staff. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz44.4%
Ambessa55.6%Fizz57.1%Ambessa42.9%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 55.6% win rate — a 11.1 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Ambessa must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Ambessa
Domination
Precision
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Fizz maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Ambessa.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.06% | 267 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,120 | 57.7% | 53.5% | |
| 49.06% | 267 | 6.0 | 871 | 12,938 | 55.3% | 45.1% | |
| 46.43% | 252 | 5.9 | 855 | 12,245 | 45.5% | 47.3% | |
| 49.53% | 214 | 5.9 | 828 | 13,002 | 59.5% | 43.1% | |
| 61.05% | 190 | 6.0 | 877 | 12,353 | 68.2% | 54.9% | |
| 49.73% | 183 | 5.8 | 890 | 12,035 | 46.6% | 52.6% | |
| 46.43% | 168 | 5.2 | 773 | 11,953 | 46.9% | 46.0% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,227 | 49.1% | 52.3% | |
| 58.33% | 156 | 5.6 | 855 | 11,624 | 49.3% | 66.3% | |
| 46.45% | 155 | 6.0 | 735 | 11,718 | 59.7% | 34.9% | |
| 51.30% | 154 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,173 | 50.0% | 52.3% | |
| 47.97% | 148 | 5.8 | 899 | 12,505 | 53.7% | 43.2% | |
| 49.66% | 147 | 5.4 | 844 | 12,108 | 46.4% | 52.6% | |
| 58.99% | 139 | 5.7 | 846 | 12,696 | 62.1% | 56.8% | |
| 61.03% | 136 | 6.1 | 902 | 11,704 | 67.1% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 132 | 5.5 | 865 | 12,707 | 65.4% | 53.8% | |
| 53.17% | 126 | 5.5 | 801 | 12,110 | 51.7% | 54.5% | |
| 38.40% | 125 | 6.1 | 828 | 12,793 | 31.4% | 43.2% | |
| 52.80% | 125 | 6.0 | 811 | 12,435 | 67.9% | 41.7% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 5.9 | 927 | 12,574 | 61.5% | 49.2% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.2 | 894 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 91 | 6.0 | 859 | 13,421 | 60.0% | 54.9% | |
| 62.92% | 89 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,234 | 66.7% | 61.0% | |
| 54.02% | 87 | 5.7 | 816 | 12,876 | 62.5% | 49.1% | |
| 58.33% | 84 | 6.0 | 882 | 13,344 | 73.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 84 | 5.8 | 791 | 11,786 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 52.00% | 75 | 5.0 | 910 | 11,801 | 51.2% | 52.9% | |
| 60.00% | 75 | 5.9 | 830 | 12,236 | 58.8% | 61.0% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,107 | 56.3% | 46.3% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 5.8 | 851 | 12,337 | 60.6% | 50.0% | |
| 62.12% | 66 | 5.9 | 856 | 12,086 | 65.5% | 59.5% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.3 | 795 | 12,207 | 44.0% | 55.0% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 6.0 | 920 | 12,942 | 58.1% | 39.4% | |
| 43.75% | 64 | 6.1 | 820 | 12,561 | 46.4% | 41.7% | |
| 50.79% | 63 | 5.6 | 804 | 12,467 | 54.8% | 46.9% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 5.9 | 948 | 12,554 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.2 | 823 | 11,786 | 48.0% | 51.9% | |
| 68.63% | 51 | 6.2 | 951 | 13,134 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 5.4 | 910 | 12,009 | 52.6% | 40.7% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.2 | 841 | 12,508 | 42.1% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.0 | 921 | 14,152 | 64.3% | 51.6% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 1.5 | 664 | 12,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 4.5 | 867 | 13,115 | 61.5% | 61.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.8 | 808 | 12,157 | 41.2% | 47.1% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.5 | 867 | 12,995 | 42.9% | 63.2% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 5.2 | 907 | 14,519 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.8 | 875 | 11,913 | 56.3% | 50.0% | |
| 67.74% | 31 | 1.7 | 808 | 15,188 | 64.3% | 70.6% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 848 | 13,757 | 30.0% | 57.9% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.5 | 802 | 12,928 | 41.7% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.4 | 773 | 12,085 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.6 | 914 | 11,863 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.0 | 873 | 12,747 | 46.1% | 46.7% | |
| 28.57% | 28 | 2.0 | 833 | 14,150 | 11.1% | 36.8% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.1 | 716 | 13,625 | 63.6% | 56.3% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.6 | 756 | 11,162 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 29.63% | 27 | 1.4 | 721 | 13,059 | 30.0% | 29.4% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.7 | 825 | 12,636 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.9 | 675 | 12,352 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.8 | 707 | 11,527 | 58.3% | 41.7% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.8 | 778 | 12,093 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.6 | 879 | 13,606 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.1 | 577 | 12,757 | 66.7% | 53.9% | |
| 72.73% | 22 | 6.4 | 717 | 11,522 | 84.6% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 994 | 12,688 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 819 | 13,674 | 60.0% | 30.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 5.7 | 951 | 13,101 | 77.8% | 70.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.8 | 737 | 13,386 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.2 | 712 | 11,568 | 22.2% | 77.8% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.4 | 797 | 13,270 | 20.0% | 41.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.7 | 754 | 13,106 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.4 | 873 | 13,473 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 761 | 12,868 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 922 | 13,719 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 722 | 9,251 | 70.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.7 | 716 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.3 | 766 | 12,816 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 4.9 | 876 | 14,217 | 66.7% | 11.1% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 4.7 | 764 | 13,908 | 0.0% | 69.2% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.5 | 694 | 12,814 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.0 | 879 | 12,555 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 719 | 12,725 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 714 | 12,889 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,033 | 12,398 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.7 | 716 | 10,614 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 827 | 11,441 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 877 | 10,591 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 1,087 | 14,281 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 634 | 11,554 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 944 | 11,014 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 773 | 14,876 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 742 | 15,386 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 782 | 11,808 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 737 | 10,731 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 796 | 14,401 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 665 | 10,983 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 924 | 14,093 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.2 | 881 | 12,397 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 732 | 11,634 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 733 | 13,084 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 894 | 7,377 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 0.9 | 979 | 10,394 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.9 | 674 | 9,836 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 806 | 11,874 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 725 | 13,236 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.2 | 886 | 15,595 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 919 | 14,286 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 812 | 13,965 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 956 | 12,053 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.1 | 687 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 992 | 11,652 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 782 | 13,096 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 792 | 12,455 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 742 | 12,139 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,060 | 13,734 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 857 | 12,812 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 821 | 14,071 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 826 | 14,757 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 833 | 11,060 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 954 | 12,555 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 998 | 16,217 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 653 | 10,629 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 709 | 8,374 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 917 | 11,819 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 717 | 14,424 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Ambessa's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 16 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Fizz do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Fizz with a 55.6% win rate versus 44.4%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Fizz is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 16 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Ambessa?
The best Fizz build against Ambessa includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Void Staff with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Ambessa?
The best Fizz runes against Ambessa use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Ambessa?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Ambessa with a 50.0% win rate. Fizz slightly edges out Ambessa in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Fizz against Ambessa?
When playing Fizz against Ambessa, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Ambessa. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.