Qiyanavs Cassiopeia
Qiyana vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Qiyana wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Cassiopeia based on 6 games. Qiyana holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Qiyana Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Qiyana performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Qiyana vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Qiyana wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, giving Qiyana a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Qiyana dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Qiyana players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Qiyana vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Qiyana, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Qiyana Build Against Cassiopeia
Immortal Path is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Qiyana needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Qiyana against Cassiopeia are Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra and Serylda's Grudge. This combination gives Qiyana an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Qiyana50.0%
Cassiopeia50.0%Qiyana75.0%Cassiopeia25.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Qiyana and Cassiopeia, with Qiyana holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Qiyana is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Qiyana, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Qiyana holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Qiyana Runes Against Cassiopeia
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Qiyana to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Qiyana matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Qiyana's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Qiyana build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.59% | 68 | 6.1 | 893 | 11,939 | 55.3% | 33.3% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 5.7 | 867 | 12,379 | 62.5% | 48.5% | |
| 40.00% | 55 | 6.2 | 804 | 11,736 | 33.3% | 45.2% | |
| 31.37% | 51 | 5.5 | 796 | 11,153 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 6.2 | 810 | 12,191 | 40.9% | 36.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 6.1 | 1,038 | 13,418 | 61.1% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 5.8 | 921 | 12,529 | 41.2% | 56.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 5.8 | 879 | 11,980 | 41.2% | 54.2% | |
| 28.95% | 38 | 5.0 | 763 | 12,486 | 18.8% | 36.4% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 6.0 | 823 | 12,895 | 43.8% | 47.4% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 4.5 | 979 | 13,605 | 60.0% | 57.9% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 5.1 | 790 | 12,376 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.4 | 778 | 11,905 | 15.4% | 68.4% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.8 | 884 | 13,012 | 58.3% | 47.4% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.2 | 998 | 12,561 | 27.3% | 72.2% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.5 | 769 | 11,964 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.3 | 822 | 14,416 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 927 | 12,845 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.1 | 910 | 12,690 | 70.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 4.2 | 945 | 11,582 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 3.8 | 749 | 12,831 | 12.5% | 46.7% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 5.9 | 833 | 11,522 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.5 | 791 | 14,326 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.1 | 808 | 12,045 | 30.8% | 44.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.0 | 741 | 13,176 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.5 | 800 | 13,970 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.8 | 746 | 13,481 | 37.5% | 61.5% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.7 | 812 | 13,218 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.6 | 730 | 11,417 | 12.5% | 63.6% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.6 | 970 | 13,231 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.9 | 778 | 10,465 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.4 | 757 | 11,635 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.0 | 806 | 12,070 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.0 | 630 | 12,874 | 28.6% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.9 | 813 | 12,456 | 36.4% | 57.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.7 | 789 | 10,237 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.1 | 921 | 10,975 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.0 | 907 | 13,163 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.9 | 980 | 12,198 | 16.7% | 72.7% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.8 | 768 | 11,338 | 66.7% | 27.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.5 | 726 | 13,803 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 0.8 | 843 | 14,545 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 0.9 | 834 | 13,329 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 856 | 10,802 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 802 | 14,053 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.2 | 656 | 12,800 | 12.5% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 4.2 | 755 | 10,943 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.5 | 746 | 10,685 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 1,019 | 13,500 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,849 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 0.9 | 807 | 12,363 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.8 | 956 | 12,961 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 893 | 10,625 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 717 | 14,226 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.5 | 823 | 12,847 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 820 | 11,799 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 866 | 11,690 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.0 | 746 | 9,425 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.4 | 734 | 11,116 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 1,167 | 15,192 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 992 | 13,395 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 1.5 | 830 | 14,797 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.2 | 793 | 12,828 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.6 | 914 | 14,503 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 797 | 10,079 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 100.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 718 | 12,379 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.0 | 834 | 12,151 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.7 | 577 | 10,030 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.0 | 778 | 11,642 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 7 | 0.8 | 674 | 13,334 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.6 | 1,031 | 16,248 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.3 | 710 | 10,231 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.5 | 935 | 13,026 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 721 | 12,043 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.9 | 1,019 | 15,664 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 1,004 | 12,610 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 804 | 15,962 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 893 | 13,450 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.9 | 781 | 11,813 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 818 | 12,779 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 860 | 15,307 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 973 | 15,456 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 713 | 14,986 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 683 | 12,657 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 824 | 11,673 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 1,068 | 14,796 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 939 | 16,141 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.6 | 466 | 11,221 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Qiyana vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Qiyana do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Qiyana wins the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Qiyana do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Qiyana has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Qiyana players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Qiyana do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Qiyana takes over the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Qiyana scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Qiyana wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Qiyana is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Qiyana build against Cassiopeia?
The best Qiyana build against Cassiopeia includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Profane Hydra, Serylda's Grudge with Immortal Path. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Qiyana runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Qiyana runes against Cassiopeia use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Qiyana vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Qiyana counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Qiyana has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate. Qiyana strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Qiyana against Cassiopeia?
When playing Qiyana against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.