Sivirvs Cassiopeia
Sivir vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Sivir wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Cassiopeia based on 6 games. Cassiopeia wins the early laning phase while Sivir scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Sivir build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Sivir Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Sivir performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Sivir vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Sivir vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Sivir wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, giving Sivir a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Cassiopeia controls the early laning stage, but Sivir outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Cassiopeia needs to press advantages before Sivir reaches their power spikes, while Sivir should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 1.4s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Sivir players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Sivir vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Sivir is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Sivir holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Sivir33.3%
Cassiopeia66.7%Sivir100.0%Cassiopeia0.0%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Sivir. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Sivir is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Sivir, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Cassiopeia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Sivir reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Sivir survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Sivir Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Inspiration
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Sivir to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Sivir matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Sivir's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Sivir build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 190 | 7.5 | 838 | 13,483 | 57.4% | 45.9% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 7.3 | 863 | 13,699 | 43.9% | 55.1% | |
| 51.16% | 129 | 7.5 | 853 | 12,880 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 66.30% | 92 | 7.7 | 882 | 14,939 | 64.5% | 67.2% | |
| 50.00% | 88 | 7.5 | 816 | 12,509 | 53.1% | 46.1% | |
| 53.16% | 79 | 7.7 | 1,032 | 14,882 | 42.9% | 58.8% | |
| 52.17% | 69 | 7.5 | 874 | 13,817 | 50.0% | 54.0% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 7.6 | 863 | 12,826 | 41.9% | 54.5% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 7.8 | 819 | 12,832 | 57.1% | 51.7% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 7.5 | 821 | 13,427 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 7.4 | 834 | 12,675 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 62.79% | 43 | 7.8 | 981 | 14,267 | 61.9% | 63.6% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 7.8 | 880 | 13,446 | 61.5% | 60.7% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 7.2 | 899 | 13,880 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 7.1 | 775 | 12,587 | 40.0% | 61.1% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 7.6 | 881 | 14,458 | 72.7% | 45.5% | |
| 31.25% | 32 | 7.2 | 804 | 13,509 | 28.6% | 32.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 7.7 | 899 | 13,760 | 63.6% | 35.3% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 7.3 | 833 | 12,805 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 7.7 | 804 | 14,306 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 7.5 | 918 | 14,704 | 50.0% | 69.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.6 | 837 | 12,253 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 7.4 | 825 | 13,891 | 25.0% | 69.2% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 7.6 | 740 | 13,009 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 8.0 | 832 | 11,713 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.5 | 980 | 16,492 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 7.0 | 943 | 12,849 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 7.4 | 987 | 14,071 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 7.9 | 1,029 | 14,228 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.5 | 761 | 13,500 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 8.0 | 1,101 | 16,197 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.5 | 1,041 | 16,242 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.8 | 810 | 14,664 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 8.2 | 737 | 13,031 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 8.1 | 919 | 16,078 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.6 | 979 | 11,231 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.9 | 843 | 18,824 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 637 | 12,856 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 8.3 | 1,091 | 16,161 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 8.6 | 977 | 13,547 | 50.0% | 66.7% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sivir vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Sivir do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Sivir wins the Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Sivir do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Sivir with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Sivir do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Sivir takes over the Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Sivir scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Sivir wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Sivir is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Sivir build against Cassiopeia?
The best Sivir build against Cassiopeia includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Sivir runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Sivir runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Sivir vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Sivir counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Sivir has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate. Sivir strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Sivir against Cassiopeia?
When playing Sivir against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Cassiopeia. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.