Swainvs Fizz
Swain vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 55.9% win rate (+11.8%) over Swain based on 34 games. Swain wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Swain vs Fizz matchup.
Swain Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Swain performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Swain vs Fizz Matchup?
Swain vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Swain vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 34 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 55.9% win rate compared to Swain's 44.1%, giving Fizz a 11.8 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Swain controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Swain needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Swain leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Swain players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Swain vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Swain, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Swain Build Against Fizz
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Swain needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Swain against Fizz are Liandry's Torment, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Swain an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 75.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Swain vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Swain50.0%
Fizz50.0%Swain37.5%Fizz62.5%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Swain and Fizz, with Swain holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Swain. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Swain has the edge early, but Fizz gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Swain Runes Against Fizz
Sorcery
Resolve
The Sorcery and Resolve rune setup gives Swain the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Swain matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Swain's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Swain build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.51% | 332 | 2.5 | 681 | 10,325 | 48.8% | 53.2% | |
| 49.49% | 293 | 2.1 | 671 | 9,737 | 50.0% | 49.1% | |
| 43.56% | 225 | 2.2 | 692 | 9,717 | 39.8% | 47.0% | |
| 46.23% | 199 | 2.8 | 709 | 10,472 | 46.0% | 46.4% | |
| 56.48% | 193 | 1.8 | 766 | 9,747 | 53.4% | 59.0% | |
| 46.24% | 186 | 1.8 | 643 | 9,708 | 46.8% | 45.9% | |
| 44.32% | 176 | 1.8 | 754 | 10,263 | 43.7% | 44.8% | |
| 49.38% | 160 | 1.7 | 666 | 9,725 | 50.8% | 48.4% | |
| 50.00% | 158 | 6.0 | 995 | 12,476 | 51.5% | 48.9% | |
| 57.05% | 156 | 1.8 | 821 | 9,798 | 54.5% | 59.5% | |
| 59.87% | 152 | 5.8 | 896 | 12,477 | 68.3% | 54.4% | |
| 56.08% | 148 | 5.6 | 913 | 12,524 | 58.6% | 53.9% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 5.2 | 867 | 11,969 | 63.6% | 49.3% | |
| 51.82% | 110 | 2.6 | 891 | 9,537 | 57.9% | 45.3% | |
| 43.64% | 110 | 1.9 | 720 | 9,939 | 40.8% | 45.9% | |
| 48.15% | 108 | 5.9 | 900 | 11,967 | 48.0% | 48.3% | |
| 48.54% | 103 | 1.7 | 665 | 9,655 | 59.0% | 42.2% | |
| 62.38% | 101 | 2.5 | 688 | 10,234 | 62.8% | 62.1% | |
| 39.60% | 101 | 3.2 | 711 | 10,294 | 28.9% | 46.0% | |
| 52.08% | 96 | 1.7 | 720 | 9,586 | 54.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.17% | 92 | 1.8 | 809 | 10,281 | 45.5% | 55.9% | |
| 38.89% | 90 | 1.6 | 694 | 9,120 | 35.7% | 41.7% | |
| 60.67% | 89 | 5.8 | 888 | 11,515 | 59.6% | 62.2% | |
| 59.55% | 89 | 5.7 | 952 | 12,459 | 63.9% | 56.6% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 2.0 | 653 | 10,404 | 59.3% | 42.4% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 5.9 | 868 | 10,794 | 47.6% | 47.7% | |
| 55.81% | 86 | 2.6 | 749 | 9,832 | 64.4% | 46.3% | |
| 58.82% | 85 | 3.2 | 716 | 10,237 | 58.8% | 58.8% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 1.7 | 787 | 9,701 | 57.8% | 43.6% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 5.9 | 853 | 9,946 | 58.5% | 35.1% | |
| 49.33% | 75 | 6.0 | 909 | 12,050 | 43.9% | 55.9% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 4.8 | 844 | 11,084 | 51.9% | 44.7% | |
| 51.35% | 74 | 1.7 | 662 | 9,443 | 46.9% | 54.8% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 5.8 | 908 | 10,794 | 51.6% | 44.2% | |
| 45.07% | 71 | 1.8 | 716 | 9,690 | 43.3% | 46.3% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.8 | 649 | 9,335 | 50.0% | 36.1% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 5.2 | 804 | 10,428 | 63.6% | 42.4% | |
| 34.43% | 61 | 1.7 | 543 | 9,196 | 33.3% | 35.1% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 5.9 | 940 | 11,156 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 60 | 5.8 | 857 | 10,480 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 57 | 2.0 | 763 | 10,272 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 32.73% | 55 | 5.0 | 857 | 11,692 | 42.9% | 26.5% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 4.7 | 956 | 10,705 | 61.5% | 44.4% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 5.8 | 949 | 13,299 | 57.9% | 55.9% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 2.1 | 725 | 9,528 | 38.1% | 56.7% | |
| 62.75% | 51 | 4.5 | 903 | 11,085 | 64.7% | 61.8% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 1.7 | 674 | 9,337 | 59.3% | 45.8% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.9 | 835 | 10,100 | 40.0% | 46.1% | |
| 60.87% | 46 | 1.6 | 829 | 9,946 | 77.3% | 45.8% | |
| 40.00% | 45 | 5.9 | 754 | 9,852 | 31.6% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.1 | 927 | 12,367 | 61.9% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 42 | 5.4 | 890 | 11,975 | 37.5% | 30.8% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 1.6 | 687 | 9,183 | 33.3% | 61.9% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 4.6 | 1,060 | 11,038 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 3.6 | 870 | 10,301 | 56.3% | 44.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 6.4 | 932 | 11,989 | 41.2% | 43.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 6.1 | 872 | 10,456 | 47.4% | 61.9% | |
| 61.54% | 39 | 6.1 | 958 | 11,678 | 73.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 2.2 | 822 | 11,234 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 4.5 | 667 | 9,359 | 38.1% | 47.1% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 5.6 | 881 | 11,036 | 47.1% | 47.6% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 6.2 | 977 | 12,240 | 52.4% | 68.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.5 | 770 | 10,635 | 43.8% | 55.0% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 5.0 | 910 | 10,947 | 60.0% | 47.6% | |
| 65.71% | 35 | 5.0 | 887 | 11,837 | 76.5% | 55.6% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.6 | 830 | 10,738 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.8 | 932 | 11,586 | 41.7% | 55.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.8 | 740 | 9,095 | 84.6% | 42.1% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.8 | 834 | 10,536 | 61.1% | 38.5% | |
| 64.52% | 31 | 5.4 | 939 | 11,827 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.5 | 805 | 11,893 | 53.3% | 26.7% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 873 | 10,736 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.0 | 988 | 13,591 | 61.5% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.5 | 1,037 | 11,176 | 54.5% | 35.3% | |
| 25.93% | 27 | 3.7 | 880 | 10,230 | 18.2% | 31.3% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.3 | 858 | 11,571 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.0 | 823 | 11,264 | 41.7% | 64.3% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.8 | 700 | 10,036 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.4 | 793 | 10,500 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 5.5 | 850 | 11,369 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.9 | 946 | 10,851 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 4.9 | 737 | 10,230 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 5.5 | 921 | 10,919 | 40.0% | 61.5% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 5.2 | 961 | 9,652 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.2 | 860 | 11,412 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.8 | 994 | 13,521 | 100.0% | 41.2% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.9 | 925 | 10,918 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 2.1 | 689 | 8,911 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.7 | 708 | 9,768 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.1 | 860 | 9,888 | 70.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.7 | 834 | 10,956 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 90.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 692 | 10,699 | 90.9% | 88.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 1,037 | 10,925 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.2 | 865 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 837 | 10,644 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 918 | 12,714 | 80.0% | 30.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 1,086 | 12,043 | 100.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 1,325 | 11,731 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.5 | 898 | 10,345 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.2 | 986 | 10,393 | 37.5% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.2 | 875 | 12,937 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 4.2 | 791 | 10,947 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 10,764 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.7 | 1,089 | 13,676 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 5.1 | 761 | 11,412 | 28.6% | 20.0% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 5.8 | 929 | 12,300 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 6.0 | 930 | 12,274 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.5 | 854 | 11,273 | 100.0% | 58.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.3 | 946 | 11,530 | 40.0% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.1 | 1,063 | 9,215 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 852 | 12,043 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.6 | 923 | 13,452 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.8 | 1,120 | 12,915 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.6 | 927 | 10,294 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 854 | 11,319 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 858 | 9,768 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.9 | 942 | 12,725 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.9 | 844 | 11,682 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 957 | 11,208 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.4 | 783 | 12,315 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.2 | 857 | 11,919 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,354 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.7 | 997 | 10,733 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,089 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.4 | 776 | 10,287 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.7 | 919 | 10,411 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 659 | 8,971 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 1,001 | 13,736 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.5 | 780 | 10,829 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 976 | 11,533 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.0 | 965 | 10,665 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.8 | 792 | 9,183 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 817 | 10,800 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 1,086 | 14,455 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 794 | 10,940 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.0 | 692 | 8,984 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 714 | 9,702 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.7 | 634 | 11,963 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.4 | 860 | 11,635 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.9 | 709 | 10,462 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.2 | 694 | 7,952 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 771 | 11,084 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 828 | 11,119 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.6 | 895 | 10,655 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.2 | 702 | 8,230 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.1 | 648 | 11,166 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 701 | 10,335 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 899 | 11,393 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.2 | 732 | 8,524 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 723 | 11,562 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 938 | 9,977 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 1,012 | 13,330 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 725 | 12,468 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 804 | 11,424 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 666 | 10,930 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Swain vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Swain do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Swain vs Fizz matchup with a 55.9% win rate compared to Swain's 44.1%, a 11.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 34 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Swain do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Swain has the advantage against Fizz with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Swain players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Swain do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Swain vs Fizz matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Swain vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Swain with a 55.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 11.8 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 34 games analyzed.
What is the best Swain build against Fizz?
The best Swain build against Fizz includes Liandry's Torment, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Blackfire Torch with Chainlaced Crushers. This build achieves a 75.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Swain runes against Fizz?
The best Swain runes against Fizz use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Swain vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Swain counter Fizz?
No, Swain struggles against Fizz with only a 44.1% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Swain players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Swain against Fizz?
When playing Swain against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.