Zedvs Jarvan IV
Zed vs Jarvan IV is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.3. Jarvan IV wins with a 64.3% win rate (+28.6%) over Zed based on 14 games. Jarvan IV holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Zed build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup.
Zed Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zed performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Jarvan IV(35.7%)Who Wins the Zed vs Jarvan IV Matchup?
Zed vs Jarvan IV Matchup Summary
The Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 14 recent matches analyzed, Jarvan IV wins with a 64.3% win rate compared to Zed's 35.7%, giving Jarvan IV a 28.6 percentage point advantage. Jarvan IV dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Zed players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Jarvan IV leads by 0.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Jarvan IV has a strong advantage in this matchup. Zed players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Jarvan IV overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zed vs Jarvan IV Laning Phase Breakdown
Jarvan IV is favored during the laning phase against Zed, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Jarvan IV holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Zed Build Against Jarvan IV
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Jarvan IV, providing the mobility and stats Zed needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zed against Jarvan IV are Voltaic Cyclosword, Axiom Arc and Serylda's Grudge. This combination gives Zed an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Jarvan IV. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Zed28.6%Jarvan IV71.4%Zed42.9%Jarvan IV57.1%Jarvan IV dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 71.4% win rate — a 42.9 percentage point lead over Zed. This lopsided early game means Jarvan IV can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Jarvan IV is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.1% win rate — 14.3 points above Zed. Extended games heavily favor Jarvan IV, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Jarvan IV holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Zed players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Zed Runes Against Jarvan IV
Precision
Sorcery
The Precision and Sorcery rune setup gives Zed the best tools to compete against Jarvan IV in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Zed matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.3. The table below shows Zed's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zed build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.46% | 244 | 6.4 | 910 | 12,643 | 54.5% | 50.8% | |
| 48.54% | 239 | 6.5 | 909 | 12,636 | 46.4% | 50.4% | |
| 46.02% | 176 | 6.4 | 879 | 12,832 | 46.7% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 164 | 6.1 | 894 | 11,741 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 49.31% | 144 | 6.3 | 959 | 12,755 | 52.5% | 47.0% | |
| 51.22% | 123 | 6.2 | 970 | 12,113 | 54.7% | 47.5% | |
| 46.15% | 117 | 5.7 | 894 | 12,851 | 47.8% | 45.1% | |
| 45.69% | 116 | 6.0 | 944 | 13,846 | 40.9% | 48.6% | |
| 48.70% | 115 | 6.3 | 862 | 12,202 | 53.2% | 45.6% | |
| 53.98% | 113 | 6.4 | 918 | 13,074 | 57.1% | 51.6% | |
| 50.47% | 107 | 6.0 | 848 | 12,154 | 49.0% | 51.7% | |
| 37.14% | 105 | 6.3 | 804 | 12,057 | 34.8% | 39.0% | |
| 44.23% | 104 | 6.1 | 903 | 11,858 | 39.7% | 51.2% | |
| 55.21% | 96 | 6.5 | 918 | 13,300 | 51.2% | 58.5% | |
| 60.22% | 93 | 6.6 | 972 | 12,793 | 55.8% | 64.0% | |
| 47.31% | 93 | 4.9 | 835 | 13,037 | 52.5% | 43.4% | |
| 55.81% | 86 | 6.2 | 888 | 12,575 | 58.5% | 53.3% | |
| 40.24% | 82 | 5.5 | 759 | 12,761 | 30.0% | 46.1% | |
| 55.84% | 77 | 1.4 | 830 | 14,472 | 40.6% | 66.7% | |
| 52.63% | 76 | 6.2 | 913 | 12,892 | 45.2% | 57.8% | |
| 45.21% | 73 | 6.1 | 903 | 13,042 | 51.5% | 40.0% | |
| 43.66% | 71 | 6.4 | 938 | 12,989 | 32.1% | 51.2% | |
| 43.66% | 71 | 6.3 | 894 | 11,475 | 38.9% | 48.6% | |
| 56.52% | 69 | 6.0 | 827 | 11,943 | 50.0% | 61.0% | |
| 40.30% | 67 | 6.2 | 1,036 | 14,057 | 56.0% | 30.9% | |
| 53.13% | 64 | 6.3 | 885 | 12,959 | 65.4% | 44.7% | |
| 41.27% | 63 | 5.9 | 807 | 11,352 | 46.9% | 35.5% | |
| 50.00% | 62 | 6.3 | 896 | 13,230 | 60.0% | 43.2% | |
| 62.90% | 62 | 6.6 | 981 | 12,638 | 58.1% | 67.7% | |
| 71.19% | 59 | 6.2 | 857 | 12,643 | 72.0% | 70.6% | |
| 32.14% | 56 | 6.4 | 856 | 12,125 | 29.6% | 34.5% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 6.0 | 1,027 | 12,875 | 47.8% | 51.6% | |
| 53.85% | 52 | 6.7 | 1,124 | 13,968 | 90.0% | 31.3% | |
| 61.22% | 49 | 6.2 | 906 | 12,487 | 57.1% | 64.3% | |
| 59.18% | 49 | 6.1 | 930 | 13,413 | 47.6% | 67.9% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 5.4 | 826 | 12,984 | 30.8% | 48.5% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 6.3 | 899 | 12,164 | 65.0% | 56.5% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 6.4 | 897 | 11,524 | 47.6% | 42.9% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.9 | 972 | 12,506 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 68.42% | 38 | 6.1 | 968 | 13,495 | 82.3% | 57.1% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 4.6 | 802 | 12,992 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 1.6 | 743 | 12,181 | 36.8% | 42.9% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 2.4 | 836 | 14,547 | 60.0% | 40.9% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 6.2 | 984 | 13,658 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.1 | 1,040 | 13,376 | 33.3% | 52.9% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 5.5 | 1,036 | 12,665 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 3.2 | 920 | 14,238 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.2 | 1,037 | 13,315 | 53.3% | 60.0% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.2 | 875 | 13,156 | 75.0% | 29.4% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.7 | 1,047 | 12,634 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.7 | 878 | 13,316 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 6.3 | 887 | 11,943 | 50.0% | 73.3% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.3 | 892 | 15,630 | 62.5% | 47.4% | |
| 72.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 970 | 13,005 | 75.0% | 69.2% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 1,003 | 14,708 | 36.4% | 42.9% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.6 | 737 | 14,284 | 42.9% | 58.8% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.3 | 887 | 14,269 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 3.5 | 1,103 | 14,169 | 81.8% | 36.4% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.3 | 836 | 14,957 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.6 | 809 | 12,364 | 27.3% | 54.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 5.9 | 1,049 | 11,959 | 69.2% | 62.5% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 843 | 15,761 | 28.6% | 38.5% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 975 | 13,192 | 27.3% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.7 | 836 | 10,863 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 78.95% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,001 | 14,340 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.3 | 868 | 12,851 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.3 | 739 | 13,696 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 2.9 | 787 | 13,291 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.1 | 838 | 14,064 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 7.1 | 939 | 13,921 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.3 | 902 | 15,072 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 4.7 | 945 | 13,425 | 55.6% | 12.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.7 | 929 | 16,657 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.5 | 834 | 13,960 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 958 | 15,329 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 982 | 13,298 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.0 | 892 | 14,408 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 3.3 | 969 | 14,206 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.6 | 690 | 14,212 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 3.5 | 1,019 | 16,182 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.7 | 1,073 | 14,317 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.7 | 786 | 14,243 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.4 | 792 | 13,133 | 85.7% | 37.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 726 | 13,852 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.9 | 808 | 10,203 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.7 | 717 | 12,243 | 28.6% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.0 | 788 | 10,465 | 44.4% | 80.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.5 | 757 | 15,298 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.5 | 934 | 12,595 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.3 | 858 | 13,207 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.0 | 917 | 13,903 | 20.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 874 | 12,595 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.4 | 774 | 11,170 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.8 | 833 | 13,223 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.5 | 901 | 11,016 | 83.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 907 | 11,922 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 773 | 14,232 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 927 | 13,318 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 872 | 14,085 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 706 | 13,880 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.5 | 836 | 10,810 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.4 | 638 | 12,540 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 902 | 12,806 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.0 | 768 | 13,196 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.6 | 783 | 11,488 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.8 | 717 | 11,745 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.6 | 743 | 12,322 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 698 | 11,611 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 1,007 | 12,459 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 847 | 12,745 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.4 | 846 | 11,934 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.0 | 732 | 11,363 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.5 | 708 | 11,123 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.9 | 1,057 | 15,154 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.0 | 875 | 12,573 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 863 | 13,524 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 750 | 10,015 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 777 | 11,665 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 809 | 13,341 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.6 | 953 | 16,399 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.6 | 807 | 12,265 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.5 | 900 | 14,173 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 759 | 10,182 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 832 | 11,207 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 926 | 15,802 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 867 | 13,732 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 933 | 10,208 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 741 | 11,164 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 600 | 7,949 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zed vs Jarvan IV - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Zed do against Jarvan IV in League of Legends?
Jarvan IV wins the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup with a 64.3% win rate compared to Zed's 35.7%, a 28.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 14 recent ranked games in patch 26.3.
How does Zed do against Jarvan IV in the early game?
In the early game, Jarvan IV has the advantage against Zed with a 71.4% win rate versus 28.6%. Jarvan IV players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Zed do against Jarvan IV in the late game?
In the late game, Jarvan IV takes over the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to 42.9%. Jarvan IV scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup?
Jarvan IV wins the matchup against Zed with a 64.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.3. The 28.6 percentage point advantage means Jarvan IV is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 14 games analyzed.
What is the best Zed build against Jarvan IV?
The best Zed build against Jarvan IV includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Axiom Arc, Serylda's Grudge with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Zed runes against Jarvan IV?
The best Zed runes against Jarvan IV use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Zed vs Jarvan IV matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Zed counter Jarvan IV?
No, Zed struggles against Jarvan IV with only a 35.7% win rate. Jarvan IV has the advantage in this matchup. Zed players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Jarvan IV's lead.
How do I play Zed against Jarvan IV?
When playing Zed against Jarvan IV, play cautiously and avoid Jarvan IV's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Jarvan IV has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.