- Win Rate
- 56.3%
- Matches
- 16
- KDA
- 1.48
Neon vs Hush Matchups
- Patch
- 13.09
- Matches
- 961,220
- Region
- All Regions
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Platform
- All Platforms
- Mode
- Competitive
- Last Updated
- Nov 3, 2026 UTC
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
Neon vs Hush matchup breakdown: Neon dominates with a 56.3% win rate across 16 matches. Superior fragging (1.48 KDA) gives Neon a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
Neon Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Neon vs Hush Matchup?
Neon vs Hush Performance Breakdown
The Neon vs Hush matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 16 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Neon vs Hush Matchup Summary
The Neon vs Hush matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 16 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 56.3% of the time compared to Hush's 43.8%, a 12.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Neon consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Hush should never take isolated fights against Neon and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Neon vs Hush Fragging Analysis
Neon claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Neon vs Hush matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 16 ranked games reveals Neon consistently outperforms Hush in direct combat scenarios. While Hush manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Neon in gunfights. Hush players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Neon dominates.
Neon vs Hush Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Hush demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Neon in this matchup, converting 56.0% of attacking rounds versus 54.9%. While this 1.2 point edge gives Hush slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 16 competitive games suggests Hush's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Neon teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Hush holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Neon players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Hush can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Hush's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Neon should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Hush shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Neon, winning 45.1% of defense rounds compared to 44.0%. This 1.2 percentage point edge suggests Hush's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Neon players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Hush can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Neon should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Hush demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Hush converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Neon should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Hush when you can wait for teammates. Hush can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Neon should be more conservative with eco aggression against Hush and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Hush can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Hush maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 56.0% attack win rate and 45.1% defense win rate. While Hush is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Neon vs Hush specific factors. The slight Hush advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Neon and Hush are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Hush has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Hush just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Neon and Hush fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Hush is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Hush's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Build the Perfect Team Comp
Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.
- Full 5v5 comp builder
- Per-agent map fit & win rates
- Matchup edges vs enemy picks

Neon has favorable matchups against 23 agents and unfavorable matchups against 6 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 78.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Gekko at 25.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.17% | 893 | 1.27 | 144.2 | 21.8% | 49.6% | 51.2% | |
| 50.96% | 679 | 1.27 | 143.6 | 22.3% | 49.3% | 52.7% | |
| 52.81% | 606 | 1.25 | 142.4 | 22.5% | 49.7% | 52.5% | |
| 54.11% | 462 | 1.31 | 147.8 | 23.5% | 50.2% | 52.4% | |
| 57.25% | 400 | 1.27 | 141.5 | 21.5% | 49.8% | 53.6% | |
| 51.47% | 373 | 1.29 | 145.0 | 21.7% | 50.9% | 50.8% | |
| 54.67% | 300 | 1.23 | 137.6 | 20.5% | 50.8% | 52.2% | |
| 48.10% | 237 | 1.24 | 141.7 | 21.4% | 49.1% | 51.5% | |
| 51.17% | 213 | 1.25 | 142.6 | 22.5% | 49.8% | 51.0% | |
| 51.59% | 157 | 1.26 | 145.0 | 21.7% | 47.2% | 53.0% | |
| 54.61% | 152 | 1.28 | 145.5 | 23.6% | 52.8% | 49.8% | |
| 44.62% | 130 | 1.25 | 143.4 | 22.9% | 46.0% | 51.0% | |
| 53.49% | 129 | 1.21 | 140.0 | 23.1% | 50.9% | 52.0% | |
| 53.04% | 115 | 1.29 | 145.6 | 22.4% | 49.2% | 52.2% | |
| 50.57% | 87 | 1.29 | 144.8 | 23.0% | 47.2% | 52.8% | |
| 51.76% | 85 | 1.26 | 142.2 | 18.6% | 47.1% | 52.7% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 1.23 | 139.2 | 22.8% | 48.9% | 53.7% | |
| 58.93% | 56 | 1.20 | 135.0 | 21.7% | 50.6% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 1.18 | 142.2 | 22.9% | 52.4% | 48.7% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 1.29 | 147.9 | 24.3% | 49.2% | 45.8% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 1.24 | 136.4 | 21.8% | 48.5% | 49.5% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.27 | 144.3 | 20.5% | 45.6% | 57.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.21 | 145.1 | 21.5% | 49.8% | 51.2% | |
| 78.26% | 23 | 1.30 | 148.9 | 21.9% | 53.4% | 57.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.09 | 131.7 | 24.3% | 54.0% | 51.7% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.48 | 156.5 | 27.1% | 54.9% | 44.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.28 | 137.1 | 26.0% | 46.8% | 56.6% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.05 | 116.4 | 17.4% | 48.1% | 42.6% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.11 | 131.7 | 27.5% | 41.4% | 45.5% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Neon's best matchup in Valorant?
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 78.3% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Gekko, with only a 25.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 23 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 6 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.