- Avg Place
- 4.21
- 1st Place
- 13.30%
- Top 4 Rate
- 55.66%
Hand Of Justice TFT Team Comps
Tear of the Goddess
Sparring Gloves- Set
- 17
- Matches
- 623,923
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 16, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Hand Of Justice as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 36 viable team comps currently building Hand Of Justice, with an average win rate of 52.42% across all compositions. The highest performing Hand Of Justice comp achieves a 82.35% win rate, primarily featuring Party Animal, Dark Star, Voyager traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Hand Of Justice is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.18 | Top 4 82.35% | First Place 33.61% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.81 | Top 4 80.79% | First Place 29.80% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.07 | Top 4 77.60% | First Place 21.88% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.01 | Top 4 77.01% | First Place 18.23% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.06 | Top 4 76.17% | First Place 15.73% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 75.81% | First Place 26.54% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.34 | Top 4 72.53% | First Place 13.18% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 72.25% | First Place 12.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.62 | Top 4 69.84% | First Place 8.44% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 66.77% | First Place 17.96% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 64.77% | First Place 11.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.61 | Top 4 64.62% | First Place 18.69% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 62.82% | First Place 11.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.88 | Top 4 61.73% | First Place 8.47% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.83 | Top 4 55.47% | First Place 8.82% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.27 | Top 4 54.56% | First Place 12.95% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.14 | Top 4 50.92% | First Place 9.22% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.35 | Top 4 50.89% | First Place 4.09% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.44 | Top 4 48.94% | First Place 8.71% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.90 | Top 4 47.96% | First Place 4.97% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.72 | Top 4 46.75% | First Place 5.16% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 45.95% | First Place 13.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.84 | Top 4 44.95% | First Place 7.26% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.93 | Top 4 44.69% | First Place 7.64% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.92 | Top 4 43.62% | First Place 5.39% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.04 | Top 4 42.40% | First Place 4.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.54 | Top 4 37.29% | First Place 4.27% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.45 | Top 4 36.20% | First Place 2.73% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.36 | Top 4 34.73% | First Place 3.55% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.91 | Top 4 33.51% | First Place 4.37% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.55 | Top 4 30.92% | First Place 1.32% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.94 | Top 4 30.21% | First Place 3.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.31 | Top 4 29.40% | First Place 3.84% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.77 | Top 4 26.74% | First Place 3.03% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.27 | Top 4 25.30% | First Place 3.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.40 | Top 4 20.51% | First Place 2.35% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Hand Of Justice Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17?
The best team comp featuring Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17 achieves a 82.35% win rate with a 0.13% pick rate. This composition uses Party Animal, Dark Star, and Voyager traits and is picked in 0.13% of games featuring Hand Of Justice.
How many team comps use Hand Of Justice in TFT?
There are 36 viable team compositions that commonly build Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17. Hand Of Justice appears in comps with an average win rate of 52.42% across 6,782 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Hand Of Justice most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17 uses the Replicator, N.O.V.A., and Fateweaver traits with a 5.03% pick rate. This composition achieves a 75.81% win rate and average placement of 3.10.
What traits work well with Hand Of Justice in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Hand Of Justice in TFT Set 17 are Party Animal, Dark Star, Voyager, Conduit, Mecha, Dark Lady, Redeemer, Vanguard, and Space Groove. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Hand Of Justice team compositions.