Top TFT Comps by First Place Rate
This table highlights TFT Set undefined team compositions with the highest first place rates, perfect for players looking to maximize their chances of winning games. Top 8-champion Set undefined compositions: Party Animal (83.5% WR, 2.7 avg), Challenger (88.5% WR, 2.5 avg), Party Animal (86.1% WR, 2.7 avg). Party Animal/Bastion leads with 83.49% win rate and 2.72 average placement. Challenger follows at 88.48% win rate. Analyzing 55 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.72 | 83.49% | 32.97% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
2.50 | 88.48% | 28.57% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
2.72 | 86.09% | 27.10% | High Contested Risk | ||||
2.84 | 83.31% | 24.12% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.17 | 77.26% | 21.72% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.01 | 80.22% | 21.63% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.03 | 79.49% | 20.51% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.43 | 71.14% | 19.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.76 | 64.58% | 17.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.14 | 79.58% | 17.51% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 69.11% | 17.34% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 69.09% | 16.76% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.54 | 71.30% | 13.71% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.52 | 70.96% | 13.50% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.72 | 65.80% | 12.35% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.36 | 75.39% | 12.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.55 | 73.25% | 11.40% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.23 | 56.27% | 10.62% | High Contested Risk | ||||
3.30 | 80.50% | 9.60% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.78 | 43.32% | 8.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.83 | 66.13% | 8.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
3.87 | 66.42% | 8.55% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.30 | 31.24% | 7.81% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.26 | 55.36% | 6.89% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
- | 4.89 | 38.63% | 6.62% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
4.39 | 53.39% | 6.18% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.96 | 39.45% | 5.93% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.06 | 36.11% | 5.56% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.77 | 44.95% | 5.41% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.98 | 39.79% | 5.34% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.97 | 38.70% | 3.99% | High Contested Risk | ||||
4.64 | 48.35% | 3.80% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.48 | 30.33% | 3.50% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.42 | 31.05% | 3.27% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
4.56 | 50.37% | 2.94% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.47 | 29.41% | 2.94% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
4.90 | 41.09% | 2.83% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.70 | 25.72% | 2.72% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.18 | 34.46% | 2.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.92 | 20.30% | 1.98% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.84 | 21.89% | 1.89% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.75 | 23.51% | 1.70% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.21 | 35.17% | 1.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.40 | 30.52% | 1.61% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.72 | 23.12% | 1.59% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.70 | 22.82% | 1.53% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.78 | 21.23% | 1.45% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.14 | 34.91% | 1.29% | High Contested Risk | ||||
5.89 | 21.34% | 1.24% | High Contested Risk | ||||
6.25 | 14.90% | 1.23% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.55 | 29.40% | 0.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | ||||
5.70 | 21.88% | 0.76% | High Contested Risk | ||||
6.33 | 13.56% | 0.29% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
5.95 | 22.22% | 0.25% | Severe Contested Risk | ||||
6.50 | 10.90% | 0.24% | High Contested Risk | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set undefined Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set undefined?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set undefined is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Ornn as the primary carry, achieving a 88.5% win rate and 2.50 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Challenger/N.O.V.A. comp?
To play Challenger/N.O.V.A., focus on building around Ornn as your main carry. Look for Ornn and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set undefined?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set undefined, Challenger/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 2.50. Other reliable options include Party Animal/Bastion (2.72 avg) and Party Animal/Sniper (2.72 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 88.5% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set undefined?
In TFT Set undefined, Rogue/Meeple has a 2.4% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
Which TFT comp wins lobbies most often in TFT Set undefined?
Party Animal/Bastion achieves first place in 33.0% of games, making it the best comp for winning lobbies outright. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 28.6% first place rate. If your goal is to win rather than just top 4, prioritize these high-ceiling compositions.
When should I play for first place vs top 4?
Play for first when you have a high-ceiling comp like Party Animal/Bastion (33.0% first rate) and hit your power spike with optimal items. Play for top 4 when you're contested, have suboptimal items, or need to preserve LP. In ranked, consistent top 4s often climb faster than coinflipping for first.